ThoughtCrimes
Old Navy Vet
Did you now! Here was my response to that sophistry at that time on the other thread, to which you couldn't respond because it fixed the lies as yours and you could not deny them!
"Really? Then where the Hell are your words, your thoughts? Why is there no lead in or no conclusion? How is the TOTALITY of that which you COPIED set aside as distinctly the work of another and not your own. Where are the REQUIRED quotation marks? Why the deviation in paragraphing from the original? Why the change in layout to your normal affected "style"? Why the improper change in the lead paragraph changing the number 8, established as the eighth point of the piece, changed to 1 as in YOUR usual style of bulleting? Why the unattributed font color change?
None of that is your work, but rather, that of another. Dropping the source at the bottom as you did is nothing but a provision for plausible deniability in your mind.
That is Rand Paul style PLAGURISM. You are really pissed because you got caught and exposed as a lazy cheat, a PLAGURIST and now a liar! You're a dishonest person with failed character!
Q.E.D." [Emphasis Added]
You were caught PLAGURIZING and then trying to cover your lie with false bravado! You corrected your bent toward PLAGURISM and I noted your attempt to redeem yourself this AM back on page 7 of this thread, but others started noticing the definite change in your style. Ya really should have kept your trap closed. Sometimes folks don't know when to just STOP rather than digging the hole they put themselves into deeper.
Our entire earlier exchange can be read on the thread, Lying About the Nuclear Deal, Page 12 if anyone is interested.
1. pla·gia·rism
ˈplājəˌrizəm/
noun
Since I used both quotation marks, and provided the link to the complete original, clearly, you are a liar attempting to score points without being able to defeat the material presented.
- the practice of taking someone else's work or ideas and passing them off as one's own. Google.
2. Now....let's go on to give examples Liberal plagiarism: taking the words of the NYTimes, MSNBC, the DNC, Obama, Jon Stewart, etc.......and never giving credit to the source.
You simpletons do it every day.
I never do it.
3. Every OP I provide is part of a thread of 5 to 10 panels which lead to an undeniable conclusion......generally revealing how wrong, malevolent, and dishonest Liberals are...
...and that is why you have attempted to claim plagiarism.
It is the best you can do.
In short, you are, and will always be, a low-life liar.
The fact that your post I critiqued initially now has a set of quotation marks when it didn't before is beside the point. I don't know how they were added after the fact and I don't really care at this time. The fact is your remaining offenses against Fair Use of a copyrighted work still remain, including those I didn't mention previously such as the use of ellipses. Proper attribution of another's work demands that any alterations to the original be noted in an accepted manner. You failed to do that to the point it looked like your usual "style". But the problem with that was the entire post was a copy and paste and totally bereft of any word or thought of your own. That is PLAGIARISM!
Even if I erred and missed the quotation marks which now, mystically and magically appear on the post, even IF that were the case, it is still a plagiarized bit without proper the attribution. It is in the Rand Paul style of plagiarism as I stated before.
Rail on all you wish against it, but your protestations will not affect the truth of the matter. You're a PLAGIARIST! You might want to correct that defect and take some writing classes to learn how to write and attribute correctly.
I'm anything but a liar, but if that puts the wind up your skirt to deflect from your own characteristics you wish to conceal, it won't change either the Moon or the Stars or the knowledge of others to the contrary.
"... now has a set of quotation marks when it didn't before is beside the point."
See....another lie from you.
I've never added any quotation marks.
Try to learn what words mean before you attempt to use them.
There now, see that first line where you quoted me? You did everything correctly, except maybe attribute that quote to Thought Crimes...Sigh!
BTW Chica, I don't need to learn or relearn the definition of PLAGIARISM. One of my former position before retirement was as adjunct faculty at a little college in Western WA. My techy students had to write papers which could be subject to peer review based on the task/purpose. I'm pretty sure I have a grasp of what PLAGIARISM constitutes. But you tell me what I don't know about cleaver little cheats and intellectual thieves like yourself!
Liar.
I've never done any such thing.
There you go again with the pejoratives and ad hominem.
What is the "thing" you claim you've never done? If it's PLAGIARISM by faulty attribution, faulty formatting et al, to which instance you are referring in my last post or any other on this topic?
Why can't you be specific? OOPS! I forgot about your penchant to dance, dodge and deflect to avoid specifics at all costs! Your Cut & Pastes go on and on with little or no narrative in your own words.
When you post without a C&P your responses are usually very clipped with a usual word count below 100 I've noticed. A sad thing is that! Never to close an argument or response with another not of like mind without one or more fallacies, or by fling ad hominem about, or sadly, both.