- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,013
- 47,207
- 2,180
It demonstrates no such thing, and he didn't setup the meeting. He merely attended at someone's request. There is no evidence of anything, period.What he did doesn't violate the law you cite. Once again you demonstrate why it's a crime for you to peddle your legal "expertise."You have to turn in emails from Russia when you are a private citizen? I didn't know that. Apparently 330 million Americans are guilty of "collusion" with Russia.
No when your father is running for office and a foreign country contacts you and says they want to help your father win an election, yes you do have to turn it in.
Really? Show me the statute that says that.
Not sure why you keep interjecting a normal citizen into this equation, as I've been extremely specific many times that this isn't an ordinary private citizen situation. Well, yes I am sure why... because you are a fucking moron.
I'm trying to inject sanity into the situation. Trump Jr was a normal citizen, and not a government employee, until his father was inaugurated. In fact, he still isn't a government employee. Working on his father's campaign doesn't make it illegal for him to listen to someone else talk, and that's what you're implying.
You really are a desperate delusional snowflake bonehead who will believe anything to further the Russian hack narrative.
It is post #117.
Trump Jr. was working on his father's campaign. He was not an ordinary private citizen.
You are not at all getting it.
Him setting up the meeting, shows INTENT to break that law, which helps to validate the rest of the investigation into collusion when combined with the other evidence that is being gone through now.