Mitch Daniels tells GOP to STFU about debt ceiling

[saveliberty]

Why didn't the GOP agree to remove subsidies and tax loopholes to make up that gap?

Because this is a spending problem for the most part and not a revenue issue. Pay attention.

 

[Trajan]

What he said was that it should be treated as a housekeeping matter.

he didn't say anything remotely like STFU.

Rachel's argument is close to the whole Republican leadership is being childish now because 4 years ago Obama was childish then.

All rhetoric aside, the Republicans feel Obama will fold, and so they can drive as hard a bargain as they want any time they get an opportunity. They want their spending cuts. They are confident they can make him ditch first.

Meanwhile, we are in our second year without a budget. I think the budget process is now truly dead. The Senate won't even take one out of committee anymore.

thank you, the missing link in all of this...and;


when we were wasting almost 2 months negotiating a lousy 38 Billion dollar cut back in march april, the dems KNEW they needed lift in the debt ceiling, so, why didn't they cut more then, to make room and make a deal on that too?

THEY precipitated this whole deadline thing meaning to stampede the reps right up to post time.

Why didn't the GOP agree to remove subsidies and tax loopholes to make up that gap?

I am talking to a sane person now, please run along....go tip a Mad Cow or something.

 

[Synthaholic]

Why didn't the GOP agree to remove subsidies and tax loopholes to make up that gap?

Because this is a spending problem for the most part and not a revenue issue. Pay attention.

Debunked. But continue to carry that water, slave!

 

[peach174]

Tax payers paid 2.2 trillion dollars and while we are in a recession.
We have more than enough to run the government. It is the social programs that are costing to much.
Even Europeans have figured this out.
This is why socialism, Marxism and communism fails. It costs to much.

 

[Synthaholic]

thank you, the missing link in all of this...and;


when we were wasting almost 2 months negotiating a lousy 38 Billion dollar cut back in march april, the dems KNEW they needed lift in the debt ceiling, so, why didn't they cut more then, to make room and make a deal on that too?

THEY precipitated this whole deadline thing meaning to stampede the reps right up to post time.

Why didn't the GOP agree to remove subsidies and tax loopholes to make up that gap?

I am talking to a sane person now, please run along....go tip a Mad Cow or something.

What keeps you from answering my question, dishonesty or just plain ignorance?

 

[saveliberty]

...so this is all something Maddow said. Now that makes some sense.

Nope. You may have to actually watch that clip to keep yourself from continuing to look like an ass!

True story!

Since the clip doesn't say what you said it does, I must conclude another party said it. It was Maddow's show right? She is the logical choice.

 

[Synthaholic]

...so this is all something Maddow said. Now that makes some sense.

Nope. You may have to actually watch that clip to keep yourself from continuing to look like an ass!

True story!

Since the clip doesn't say what you said it does, I must conclude another party said it. It was Maddow's show right? She is the logical choice.

How do you know it doesn't say what I said it says? You didn't watch it!

I bet that water is getting heavy!

 

[peach174]

Since Trajan isn't honest enough to answer, here is what Mitch Daniels said:


"We're going to raise it, as a responsible government must."

"This is really housekeeping, Tim."

"This has nothing to say...and nothing to do with future spending...this simply reflects decisions made in the past."

"And it ought to be treated as the housekeeping matter it is."

So? Where's the "stfu" quote?

What STFU quote?

This STFU quote, you are the one who put it up
Mitch Daniels tells GOP to STFU about debt ceiling

 

[saveliberty]

Why didn't the GOP agree to remove subsidies and tax loopholes to make up that gap?

Because this is a spending problem for the most part and not a revenue issue. Pay attention.

Debunked. But continue to carry that water, slave!

From your little chart? Seriously? Took me a whole second to blow that out of the water.

<yawn>

 

[saveliberty]

Nope. You may have to actually watch that clip to keep yourself from continuing to look like an ass!

True story!

Since the clip doesn't say what you said it does, I must conclude another party said it. It was Maddow's show right? She is the logical choice.

How do you know it doesn't say what I said it says? You didn't watch it!

I bet that water is getting heavy!

Failed Synthaholic conclusion and assumption.

 

[Warrior102]

Go back to picking lice out of your beard.

Excuse me, but what did I ever say to you to prompt this insult?

If you're an angry little fuck - seek help. Don't take it out on people you don't even know.

Jerk

You came in here bitching about Maddow, when I stated in the OP that this isn't about Maddow, and to skip ahead to the 4 minute mark.

You are only here to derail the thread with your hatred of Maddow and lesbians and Liberals.

Bitching?
I am merely citing her inability to function as a "Journalist."
She's on-par with quacks like Sean Hannity.
Do you blindly follow / agree with / commend idiots like this?

You're probably one of Ed Schultz's 214 viewers I bet.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Excuse me, but what did I ever say to you to prompt this insult?

If you're an angry little fuck - seek help. Don't take it out on people you don't even know.

Jerk

You came in here bitching about Maddow, when I stated in the OP that this isn't about Maddow, and to skip ahead to the 4 minute mark.

You are only here to derail the thread with your hatred of Maddow and lesbians and Liberals.

Bitching?
I am merely citing her inability to function as a "Journalist."
She's on-par with quacks like Sean Hannity.
Do you blindly follow / agree with / commend idiots like this?

You're probably one of Ed Schultz's 214 viewers I bet.

214? Wow... I pegged him at about 105.

 

[oreo]

4 minute mark: Rachel Maddow Show

Don't worry - if you start at 4 minutes, you won't have to watch any Rachel at all. I know how allergic some of you are to facts and common sense.

I missed the part where Daniels tells the gop to stfu......

another dishonest post...imagine my shock.....

if you wanted to whore for maddow just wear a dress and hit the strip.

And get a football neck--LOL

 

[oreo]

So? Where's the "stfu" quote?

What STFU quote?

This STFU quote, you are the one who put it up
Mitch Daniels tells GOP to STFU about debt ceiling

Mitch McConnell didn't say that---

 

[Synthaholic]

What STFU quote?

This STFU quote, you are the one who put it up
Mitch Daniels tells GOP to STFU about debt ceiling

Mitch McConnell didn't say that---

Drunk already?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"We're going to raise it, as a responsible government must."

"This is really housekeeping, Tim."

"This has nothing to say...and nothing to do with future spending...this simply reflects decisions made in the past."

"And it ought to be treated as the housekeeping matter it is."

Indeed.

This is an ‘issue’ contrived by the right to use as a weapon against the left and enrage the Base.

You are only here to derail the thread with your hatred of Maddow and lesbians and Liberals.

All the better to deflect with and avoid the facts and truth.

 

[Salt Jones]

4 minute mark: Rachel Maddow Show

Don't worry - if you start at 4 minutes, you won't have to watch any Rachel at all. I know how allergic some of you are to facts and common sense.

Rachel Maddow = Common Sense??

I know - everyone who watches Fox is braindead.

Latest Cable News ratings -

Hell, she's behind that blow-hard Piers (said with a lisp) Morgan.

Shit - she can't even keep up with that idiot Hannity

FNC Hannity 1,808 407 837
CNN Piers Morgan Tonight 1,050 206 318
MSNBC Rachel Maddow Show 852 265 438
CNBC WALT: MAN BEHIND THE MYTH 132 45 82
HLN DR. DREW 879 255 369

Hell, they are all behind sponge bob, does that make SB smarter?

 

[Trajan]

"We're going to raise it, as a responsible government must."

"This is really housekeeping, Tim."

"This has nothing to say...and nothing to do with future spending...this simply reflects decisions made in the past."

"And it ought to be treated as the housekeeping matter it is."

Indeed.

This is an ‘issue’ contrived by the right to use as a weapon against the left and enrage the Base.

You are only here to derail the thread with your hatred of Maddow and lesbians and Liberals.

All the better to deflect with and avoid the facts and truth.

the only problem is I never referenced "lesbians and Liberals" in any context etc...so I guess that makes you a hack.....

 

[Zona]

4 minute mark: Rachel Maddow Show

Don't worry - if you start at 4 minutes, you won't have to watch any Rachel at all. I know how allergic some of you are to facts and common sense.

Rachel Maddow = Common Sense??

I know - everyone who watches Fox is braindead.

Latest Cable News ratings -

Hell, she's behind that blow-hard Piers (said with a lisp) Morgan.

Shit - she can't even keep up with that idiot Hannity

FNC Hannity 1,808 407 837
CNN Piers Morgan Tonight 1,050 206 318
MSNBC Rachel Maddow Show 852 265 438
CNBC WALT: MAN BEHIND THE MYTH 132 45 82
HLN DR. DREW 879 255 369

Dude, seriously, I thought you were better than thinking ratings = good content. Fox has high high ratings. Very high. Its a liberal media, but Fox has the best ratings...(?).

High ratings in this case (I say) = sheeple who like to be told what to think. Please, please see my sig. It sums up ratings perfectly dude.

No shit.

 

[Zona]

This thread only proved one thing to me. Trajan is a lying fuck who is a horrible hack.

For reals......