Michael Tomasky - Congress To Get More Conservative.....

Listening

Gold Member
Aug 27, 2011
14,989
1,650
260
Despite the piss-for-brains people like JakeTheFake, even Michael Tomasky states out and out what is going on.

In a rather lengthy and well written article, Tomasky says the following:

The lead story out of the mainstream political press this year has been that establishment conservatism “tamed” the Tea Party, and to the extent that a number of Tea Party challengers lost to establishment conservatives in GOP primaries, this is true. But it’s also a fact that McConnell’s caucus is about to get considerably more conservative than it had been, with the addition of seven very conservative senators: Ernst, Perdue, Colorado’s Cory Gardner, Nebraska’s Ben Sasse, Montana’s Steve Daines, Arkansas’s Tom Cotton, and North Carolina’s Thom Tillis.4

Can McConnell herd these politicians? He will undoubtedly start to encounter the same problem Harry Reid had in 2009 and 2010, when Reid was trying to round up votes for Obama. He’ll find that legislators who know they potentially hold the fifty-first vote for a piece of compromise legislation may start dictating terms to their leader instead of the other way around. In addition, the legislators named above will be under enormous pressure from the right not to compromise at all.

The Senate, moreover, is the calmer of the two bodies. On January 3 the House will have fourteen additional Republican seats. A majority of these folks appear to have at least some Tea Party beliefs. Wisconsin Representative-elect Glenn Grothman, for example, opposes equal-pay legislation because “you could argue that money is more important for men.” Just because McConnell says that there will be no government shutdown or negotiations over the debt ceiling hardly means that most GOP House members will agree.

Now We Face 2016 by Michael Tomasky The New York Review of Books

********************************

Yep, those mainstreamers just "rolled"....NOT.

Time to face up to the fact that America is electing more and more conservative legislators.
 
What it's getting is more Reactionary, and that fine with the Democrats. Reactionaries hate to govern which makes them walking targets at election time, especially now when people actually want their problems addressed with solutions for today and not the solutions of 1950, or 1789.
 
What it's getting is more Reactionary, and that fine with the Democrats. Reactionaries hate to govern which makes them walking targets at election time, especially now when people actually want their problems addressed with solutions for today and not the solutions of 1950, or 1789.

What solutions would that be ?

Now, make sure you answer with stuff the fed has done right....

If you answer "They keep our food safe", I'll laugh for the next ten minutes.
 
What it's getting is more Reactionary, and that fine with the Democrats. Reactionaries hate to govern which makes them walking targets at election time, especially now when people actually want their problems addressed with solutions for today and not the solutions of 1950, or 1789.

What solutions would that be ?

Now, make sure you answer with stuff the fed has done right....

If you answer "They keep our food safe", I'll laugh for the next ten minutes.
Solutions? Yep, safe food is one. And drugs, and roads, and workplaces, and buildings, and water, and air, and investments, and airplanes, and cars, and schools, and the like. They may not like paying for it, or the implications of getting it, but that's what they want.
 
What it's getting is more Reactionary, and that fine with the Democrats. Reactionaries hate to govern which makes them walking targets at election time, especially now when people actually want their problems addressed with solutions for today and not the solutions of 1950, or 1789.

What solutions would that be ?

Now, make sure you answer with stuff the fed has done right....

If you answer "They keep our food safe", I'll laugh for the next ten minutes.
Solutions? Yep, safe food is one. And drugs, and roads, and workplaces, and buildings, and water, and air, and investments, and airplanes, and cars, and schools, and the like. They may not like paying for it, or the implications of getting it, but that's what they want.

I don't think anyone minds paying for something of "value".

Most of what you describe isn't universal. Education might have been at one time, but many people question what they are getting (or their children are getting) for their tax dollars.
 
What it's getting is more Reactionary, and that fine with the Democrats. Reactionaries hate to govern which makes them walking targets at election time, especially now when people actually want their problems addressed with solutions for today and not the solutions of 1950, or 1789.

What solutions would that be ?

Now, make sure you answer with stuff the fed has done right....

If you answer "They keep our food safe", I'll laugh for the next ten minutes.
Solutions? Yep, safe food is one. And drugs, and roads, and workplaces, and buildings, and water, and air, and investments, and airplanes, and cars, and schools, and the like. They may not like paying for it, or the implications of getting it, but that's what they want.
The idiot at it again.
 
What it's getting is more Reactionary, and that fine with the Democrats. Reactionaries hate to govern which makes them walking targets at election time, especially now when people actually want their problems addressed with solutions for today and not the solutions of 1950, or 1789.

What solutions would that be ?

Now, make sure you answer with stuff the fed has done right....

If you answer "They keep our food safe", I'll laugh for the next ten minutes.
Solutions? Yep, safe food is one. And drugs, and roads, and workplaces, and buildings, and water, and air, and investments, and airplanes, and cars, and schools, and the like. They may not like paying for it, or the implications of getting it, but that's what they want.
The idiot at it again.
Projection little man, pure projection.
 
What it's getting is more Reactionary, and that fine with the Democrats. Reactionaries hate to govern which makes them walking targets at election time, especially now when people actually want their problems addressed with solutions for today and not the solutions of 1950, or 1789.

What solutions would that be ?

Now, make sure you answer with stuff the fed has done right....

If you answer "They keep our food safe", I'll laugh for the next ten minutes.
Solutions? Yep, safe food is one. And drugs, and roads, and workplaces, and buildings, and water, and air, and investments, and airplanes, and cars, and schools, and the like. They may not like paying for it, or the implications of getting it, but that's what they want.
The idiot at it again.
Projection little man, pure projection.
Yeah, you projected that you are an idiot, boy.
 
What it's getting is more Reactionary, and that fine with the Democrats. Reactionaries hate to govern which makes them walking targets at election time, especially now when people actually want their problems addressed with solutions for today and not the solutions of 1950, or 1789.

LOL @ Reactionary Jake
 
Isn't today the day we put Mary Landrieu out to pasture ?
 
So here we see the mainstream morons avoiding the facts that Tomansky has brought to light.

Fakey is no where to be found on this one.

Sucks to be him.
 
Still crickets....

JakeStarkey is off in lalaland.....where people like him.

Or maybe he went to Omaha for Chistmas.

In any event, I thought I'd bump this one. After all Tomasky is a liberal hack and if he admits things are getting worse....well, I'd love to see the left say it isn't.
 
Libs won't touch it and neither will the pussies in the middle.
 
That's why Boehner slapped the Tea Party challenge to his Speakership to the floor and kicked it in the Nuts.

Gohmert has been told he will be in charge of cleaning the toilets if he does not toe the line.

Not worried by freaks like you at all now.

ACA and the EO are untouchable.

Let's see what governance the President and the Congress can get together with.
 

Forum List

Back
Top