Local Dems have words of their own for Coulter

[Stephanie]

Or use every fire hydrant that they walk past

Now that was dang funny...:rotflmao:

 

[red states rule]

Now that was dang funny...:rotflmao:

No, it dog gone funny

 

[nt250]

OTT comments are fine. Sloppy research and outright lies aren't.

Name one lie Ann Coulter has ever been caught in.

Just one.

You won't be able to because Ann Coulter has never lied. Sloppy research? Yeah, she's made some mistakes. But nothing big. She mistook someone's grandfather for their father. She said Dale Earnhart's death wasn't on the front page of the NYT. She called end notes foot notes. She said that she and Al Franken had met socially and were "friendly" towards each other. He took issue with that statement. Like most liberals he went ballistic and had to make her clarify her statement that they weren't friends. OK, OK, they were civil towards each other in these social settings.

That's about it. Ann Coulter had a entire website dedicated to exposing her lies. It was called anticoulter.com and it gave up about two years ago.

Last I read the owner was trying to sell the url for $600. I just tried it and it's not in use.

You cannot debunk an opinion. That's what Ann does. She writes her opinion, which by their nature cannot be "lies". You call them "lies" because you can't stand them. Which is typical of a liberal.

Ann Coulter has made mistakes, but she admits them and corrects them.

Which is a lot more than some liberal columnists do. Next time you're really bored, check out this story about a lie told my liberal columnist Maureen Dowd:

http://http://www.thenationaldebate.com/blogger/articles/dowd1.htm

Keep in mind, we're talking about people who complain about something as petty Ann Coulter calling end notes foot notes. Here is a case where Maureen Dowd purposely altered a quote and then wouldn't admit it.

 

[red states rule]

Like with Rush, Sean, and Fox News, Ann makes mistakes but admits and corrects them

Libs hate them because they expose liberals and liberalism for what it is.

 

[sitarro]

Natalie Portman...:teeth:

So like a pedophile you like the look of a preteen or a bald girl that is on the verge of starving to death in a WWII prison camp. I bet you own a copy of
"Leon the Professional" because that has the scenes that were cut from the American release, Euros are more comfortable with pedophilia I guess. Are you a fan of "Lolita" also?

 

[Dr Grump]

So like a pedophile you like the look of a preteen or a bald girl that is on the verge of starving to death in a WWII prison camp. I bet you own a copy of
"Leon the Professional" because that has the scenes that were cut from the American release, Euros are more comfortable with pedophilia I guess. Are you a fan of "Lolita" also?

Er, last time I looked Natalie is 25. Care to give me your definition of a pre-teen? Never saw Lolita. Have no intention of doing so. Re the bald girl, unless you are talking about V for Vendetta whereby she was 24 when she made it, I have no idea what you talking about. Again, what in your warped mind is preteen about her now? Projecting maybe? You asked my definition of an intelligent woman. Are you saying she is not intelligent, not a woman, or both?

 

[Dr Grump]

Name one lie Ann Coulter has ever been caught in.

Just one.

You won't be able to because Ann Coulter has never lied. Sloppy research? Yeah, she's made some mistakes. But nothing big. She mistook someone's grandfather for their father. She said Dale Earnhart's death wasn't on the front page of the NYT. She called end notes foot notes. She said that she and Al Franken had met socially and were "friendly" towards each other. He took issue with that statement. Like most liberals he went ballistic and had to make her clarify her statement that they weren't friends. OK, OK, they were civil towards each other in these social settings.

That's about it. Ann Coulter had a entire website dedicated to exposing her lies. It was called anticoulter.com and it gave up about two years ago.

Last I read the owner was trying to sell the url for $600. I just tried it and it's not in use.

You cannot debunk an opinion. That's what Ann does. She writes her opinion, which by their nature cannot be "lies". You call them "lies" because you can't stand them. Which is typical of a liberal.

Ann Coulter has made mistakes, but she admits them and corrects them.

Which is a lot more than some liberal columnists do. Next time you're really bored, check out this story about a lie told my liberal columnist Maureen Dowd:

http://http://www.thenationaldebate.com/blogger/articles/dowd1.htm

Keep in mind, we're talking about people who complain about something as petty Ann Coulter calling end notes foot notes. Here is a case where Maureen Dowd purposely altered a quote and then wouldn't admit it.

What you see as mistakes I see as lies. She has made too many "mistakes" for them to be coincidence. She is from the radical right and deserves nothing but to be laughed at like the loonie left. Just a radical with an opinion. Who cares?

 

[acludem]

Ann Coulter can't hold a candle to Al Franken. Al doesn't go out of his way to attack his opposition personally and frankly, neither does Michael Moore. You don't hear Michael Moore and Al Franken referring to all Conservatives as "traitors" or "anti-America". This is what Ann Coulter does. Her books are full of sweeping generalizations made with shady-at-best evidence.

Sorry, I don't find anorexic looking, hate-spewing women attractive. That's not to say there aren't attractive conservative women out there, IMHO, Ann ain't one of 'em.

If you want to see several examples of Ann Coulter's lies, just pick up the book "Lies and the Lying Liars who Tell Them" By Al Franken. He and his group of researches give you a blow-by-blow (I know using the words "blow" and "Ann Coulter" in the same sentence might be too much for some of you) account of how Ann Coulter lies through her "endnotes".

acludem

 

[sitarro]

Er, last time I looked Natalie is 25. Care to give me your definition of a pre-teen? Never saw Lolita. Have no intention of doing so. Re the bald girl, unless you are talking about V for Vendetta whereby she was 24 when she made it, I have no idea what you talking about. Again, what in your warped mind is preteen about her now? Projecting maybe? You asked my definition of an intelligent woman. Are you saying she is not intelligent, not a woman, or both?

It doesn't matter how old she is, she looks 13, that was the point.

 

[Dr Grump]

It doesn't matter how old she is, she looks 13, that was the point.

Really? I don't think so....And the point was you asked for an example of an intelligent good-looking woman. I do so, and you go off on a paedophile tangent instead of refuting my example.Typical conservative...

 

[ScreamingEagle]

Ann Coulter can't hold a candle to Al Franken. Al doesn't go out of his way to attack his opposition personally and frankly, neither does Michael Moore. You don't hear Michael Moore and Al Franken referring to all Conservatives as "traitors" or "anti-America". This is what Ann Coulter does. Her books are full of sweeping generalizations made with shady-at-best evidence.

Sorry, I don't find anorexic looking, hate-spewing women attractive. That's not to say there aren't attractive conservative women out there, IMHO, Ann ain't one of 'em.

If you want to see several examples of Ann Coulter's lies, just pick up the book "Lies and the Lying Liars who Tell Them" By Al Franken. He and his group of researches give you a blow-by-blow (I know using the words "blow" and "Ann Coulter" in the same sentence might be too much for some of you) account of how Ann Coulter lies through her "endnotes".

acludem

Al Franken is nothing more than a lying manipulating hypocritical smear merchant.

The old charges made by Franken have been long ago answered and rebutted by Coulter. Case over. Franken went back under his rock. Check out this site to enlighten yourself on the subject of Al Franken's "blow-by-blows".
http://www.lyingliar.com/lies/coulter.htm

 

[Dr Grump]

Al Franken is nothing more than a lying manipulating hypocritical smear merchant.

The old charges made by Franken have been long ago answered and rebutted by Coulter. Case over. Franken went back under his rock. Check out this site to enlighten yourself on the subject of Al Franken's "blow-by-blows".
http://www.lyingliar.com/lies/coulter.htm

All I see in that link is dodging, feigning and more dodging...nice try tho'!

 

[sitarro]

Ann Coulter can't hold a candle to Al Franken. Al doesn't go out of his way to attack his opposition personally and frankly, neither does Michael Moore. You don't hear Michael Moore and Al Franken referring to all Conservatives as "traitors" or "anti-America". This is what Ann Coulter does. Her books are full of sweeping generalizations made with shady-at-best evidence.

Sorry, I don't find anorexic looking, hate-spewing women attractive. That's not to say there aren't attractive conservative women out there, IMHO, Ann ain't one of 'em.

If you want to see several examples of Ann Coulter's lies, just pick up the book "Lies and the Lying Liars who Tell Them" By Al Franken. He and his group of researches give you a blow-by-blow (I know using the words "blow" and "Ann Coulter" in the same sentence might be too much for some of you) account of how Ann Coulter lies through her "endnotes".

acludem

You know ac,

If anyone wasn't sure how much of an idiot you are, than the first paragraph of this post revealed that even the lowest expectations were giving you way too much credit. How incredibly naive of you.

 

[sitarro]

Really? I don't think so....And the point was you asked for an example of an intelligent good-looking woman. I do so, and you go off on a paedophile tangent instead of refuting my example.Typical conservative...

What the hell is a paedophile?

 

[Dr Grump]

What the hell is a paedophile?

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=paedophile

paedophile

n : an adult who is sexually attracted to children [syn: pedophile]


Dodge, weave, feint...yadda, yadda, yadda

 

[sitarro]

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=paedophile

paedophile

n : an adult who is sexually attracted to children [syn: pedophile]


Dodge, weave, feint...yadda, yadda, yadda

do you spell color with a u too?

 

[Dr Grump]

do you spell color with a u too?

Yep...

 

[Stephanie]

Evidently Ann spoke the truth what she said about the Dems. using these people for their political use.

If not, why the hell do these Democrats like Hilley and these idiots in this article have to make any kind of comments whatsoever??? What's it to them?? They shouldn't be involved in any of this... But yet here they are..

They've trotted out a mother of a dead soldier(who unfortunately lost her son after he signed up for a second time for the military)
A man with no arms or legs(who unfortunately was injured in a accident in Vietnam)
Widows of a terrorist attack,( who happen to blame President Bush for their husbands deaths, instead of the terrorist who actually killed them)....
A senile old military Rep.
And were getting ready for a new one, the officer in the military who is refusing to go to Iraq.(and from what I've been reading on this one, he enlisted after the war had already started)
The list goes on and on.

Pretty pathetic and so transparent..

 

[red states rule]

Evidently Ann spoke the truth what she said about the Dems. using these people for their political use.

If not, why the hell do these Democrats like Hilley and these idiots in this article have to make any kind of comments whatsoever??? What's it to them?? They shouldn't be involved in any of this... But yet here they are..

They've trotted out a mother of a dead soldier(who unfortunately lost her son after he signed up for a second time for the military)
A man with no arms or legs(who unfortunately was injured in a accident in Vietnam)
Widows of a terrorist attack,( who happen to blame President Bush for their husbands deaths, instead of the terrorist who actually killed them)....
A senile old military Rep.
And were getting ready for a new one, the officer in the military who is refusing to go to Iraq.
The list goes on and on.

Pretty pathetic and so transparent..

Liberalism requires "victims". They must show the evils of capitalism, national defense, economic growth, and captialism by trotting out "victims"

Libs must have one group of people VS another group of people. Old VS young; rich VS poor; white VS black; men VS women; ect

Libs then step in and say how they need to change the laws. Of course the new law will not solve the problem, it will make the libs LOOK important and thus improve their chances of getting reelected

 

[Stephanie]

Liberalism requires "victims". They must show the evils of capitalism, national defense, economic growth, and capitalism by trotting out "victims"

Libs must have one group of people VS another group of people. Old VS young; rich VS poor; white VS black; men VS women; etc

Libs then step in and say how they need to change the laws. Of course the new law will not solve the problem, it will make the libs LOOK important and thus improve their chances of getting reelected

I'd have to agree with this...
It's a very disgusting practice of theirs, but they've been doing it for yrs and yrs so they feel no shame whatsoever about it...
I grew up in Illinois, so believe me I was indoctrinated into the Democrat party...
But watching them pull the scare tactics, see them being taken over by the socialist ideas and calling everyone names, like racist, bigots, homophobes, well that's when I became a Republican in my latter 20's...
Thank goodness for our country that it has fallen away from the Democrats....