nat4900
Diamond Member
- Mar 3, 2015
- 42,021
- 5,964
- 1,870
- Banned
- #1
Just yesterday in a NYT interview, Trump stated that IF he had known that Sessions would recuse himself [from any investigations regarding Trump's campaign and Russia,] Trump would NOT have nominated him.....
fair enough, as a statement, but there are many questions that arise from such a statement.
!. Are there OTHER duties entailed in the AG position other than the Russia investigation?
2. Is Sessions qualified to be an AG regarding all other matters that fall under the responsibilities of the DOJ?
3. What was the real expectations by Trump of Sessions' subsequent decisions on the Russia investigation had Sessions NOT recused himself?
4. Does the AG's oath of office entail any mention that the AG must be loyal to the president?
5, Overall, should the DOJ serve and be loyal to the nation OR the president?...and if one responds with "both", what happens when that service to country conflicts with the service requested by the president?
Honest and objective responses (without the usual, "but, but, Obama" and "but, but, Clinton") would be appreciated.
fair enough, as a statement, but there are many questions that arise from such a statement.
!. Are there OTHER duties entailed in the AG position other than the Russia investigation?
2. Is Sessions qualified to be an AG regarding all other matters that fall under the responsibilities of the DOJ?
3. What was the real expectations by Trump of Sessions' subsequent decisions on the Russia investigation had Sessions NOT recused himself?
4. Does the AG's oath of office entail any mention that the AG must be loyal to the president?
5, Overall, should the DOJ serve and be loyal to the nation OR the president?...and if one responds with "both", what happens when that service to country conflicts with the service requested by the president?
Honest and objective responses (without the usual, "but, but, Obama" and "but, but, Clinton") would be appreciated.