I'm curious. Do RWs think AGW is a fraud simply because republicans told them it is?

[Billy000]

I mean aside from skewed, non-peer-reviewed studies funded by oil companies, republicans are really the only ones saying it is a scam. The rest of the world laughs at them. I don't understand why they dont realize that. Republicans are either willfully ignorant on this issue or they are protecting the interests of big business. Why do you people listen to these corrupt douche bags?

RWs like to cite small studies that conflict with the findings of the 97% global consensus on this issue, but what they fail to realize is that they really don't understand how science works. Most of the studies that conflict with AGW are small in scope and not verified by independent researchers. Without independent verification, it is easy to skew the results of the studies and draw a fallacious conclusion.

 

[westwall]

No, THINKING people know it's a fraud because there is zero empirical data to support the "CO2 drives the global temp theory." Period. Everything you clowns cite is based on computer models. EVERYTHING. Come back when you actually have some real data.

You do know what "data" is...right?

 

[Siete]

CO2

 

[Conservative65]

CO2

You emit CO2 when you exhale. Stop breathing if you think it's bad.

 

[hadit]

CO2

That is factually incorrect. CO2 is invisible. What you are seeing in that photo is water vapor and smoke particles. Please do try again.

 

[hadit]

CO2

You emit CO2 when you exhale. Stop breathing if you think it's bad.

Better yet, breathe on a plant. They love the stuff.

 

[Redfish]

I mean aside from skewed, non-peer-reviewed studies funded by oil companies, republicans are really the only ones saying it is a scam. The rest of the world laughs at them. I don't understand why they dont realize that. Republicans are either willfully ignorant on this issue or they are protecting the interests of big business. Why do you people listen to these corrupt douche bags?

RWs like to cite small studies that conflict with the findings of the 97% global consensus on this issue, but what they fail to realize is that they really don't understand how science works. Most of the studies that conflict with AGW are small in scope and not verified by independent researchers. Without independent verification, it is easy to skew the results of the studies and draw a fallacious conclusion.

Billy do you know what AGW stands for? Hint, its not climate change.

 

[Siete]

more co2



pesky LA,

 

[gipper]

No.

One would have to be a fool to believe the Rs. However one would also have to be a fool to believe the statist progressive myth that is AGW.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

It's fraud because all the fraud that is behind it Billy Boy. Tampered data, political agendas, etc... that's what makes it a fraud. It isn't science, it's a political movement aimed at controlling people's behavior.

 

[Conservative65]

CO2

You emit CO2 when you exhale. Stop breathing if you think it's bad.

Better yet, breathe on a plant. They love the stuff.

All these GW nuts emit CO2 when they exhale. Imagine if they all voluntarily stopped breathing to prove they believe what they claim CO2 does.

 

[hadit]

more co2



pesky LA,

That is also factually incorrect. That is smog, not CO2. CO2 is invisible, but please try again. You'll get it right sometime, maybe.

 

[hadit]

CO2

You emit CO2 when you exhale. Stop breathing if you think it's bad.

Better yet, breathe on a plant. They love the stuff.

All these GW nuts emit CO2 when they exhale. Imagine if they all voluntarily stopped breathing to prove they believe what they claim CO2 does.

It would certainly be a lot quieter.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

CO2

No it isn't..... you can';t see Co2... no to mention Co2 is essential to life. Have you ever taken a science class in your life?

Geeze...

 

[deltex1]

CO2

You emit CO2 when you exhale. Stop breathing if you think it's bad.

Better yet, breathe on a plant. They love the stuff.

Fidel would rather breathe on Obabble's cucumber.

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

No, THINKING people know it's a fraud because there is zero empirical data to support the "CO2 drives the global temp theory." Period. Everything you clowns cite is based on computer models. EVERYTHING. Come back when you actually have some real data.

You do know what "data" is...right?

Since you're so sure you know what it is, why didn't you post any?
If the data is there to show CO2 does not cause the problem, it should be simple enough to find it.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

more co2



pesky LA,

That is also factually incorrect. That is smog, not CO2. CO2 is invisible, but please try again. You'll get it right sometime, maybe.

I wonder if these goofs got through the first grade...

 

[DriftingSand]

No ... I think you're a fraud because I say so.

 

[Conservative65]

CO2

You emit CO2 when you exhale. Stop breathing if you think it's bad.

Better yet, breathe on a plant. They love the stuff.

All these GW nuts emit CO2 when they exhale. Imagine if they all voluntarily stopped breathing to prove they believe what they claim CO2 does.

It would certainly be a lot quieter.

Don't count on it happening. Liberals aren't willing to prove with actions what they claim. It's the same with the bleeding hearts and social programs. They're all about helping just with someone else's money.

 

[NoTeaPartyPleez]

CO2

You emit CO2 when you exhale. Stop breathing if you think it's bad.

Better yet, breathe on a plant. They love the stuff.

Fidel would rather breathe on Obabble's cucumber.

Ah, of course.....DuhTex comes in with a homosexual reference. Sorta' really Freudian.