Republicans: just how easy do you think it is to commit voter fraud in the first place?

They kicked out the observers, then dragged out tens of thousands of ballots from concealment and counted them numerous times....You don't even need narration of that security footage to see that's what was done.

In Philly, "observers" were kept in a fenced-in cage, as far as 50 yards where ballots were being counted.

In Detroit, observers were not let back into the counting area after bathroom and lunch breaks, then pizza boxes were taped up over the windows, so nobody could see what was going on.

All of this is confirmed by phone videos and hundreds of eye withnesses....But we're supposed to believe a deranged, gaslighting, fucking moonbat lunatic -i.e, you- over all of that.


Yeah....Go fuck yourself.
Dude you have absolutely no idea how those ballots came to be there and she doesn’t either. If she did, she would explain, specifically how proper procedure was not followed. She has no idea. She knows nothing about it.

It’s funny that you put observers in quotes because that’s my takeaway lol. Who are those people? Are they authorized to be in the room? Why? It’s not like offices like that are just open to anyone of the public. How could these possible biased people be objectively sure fraud actually happened? What training do they have for that?
 
If you want to double vote:
1. You vote legally under your own name.
2. Where no voter or Photo ID is required, you vote for the college student who used to live in your house--you know his name, birthdate, address, last four numbers of his SS#
3. Same with your elderly relatives who passed in the last few years.
4. You vote for your friend who is comatose in the nursing home.

And if you're really creative you manage to get hold of a lot of mail in ballots, fill them out, put various names and manipulate some sort of signature on the envelope knowing that nobody will check very closely if at all.
If you live in New Mexico you can register on the day of election, flash a phony photo ID that probably won't be checked very carefully, and you are allowed to vote immediately. Once your vote is entered into the counting machine, it may or may not be thrown out as an illegal ballot later.
Well that would get hairy pretty fast because that college student may have voted at his new address thus there would be a red flag. How many people even know their roommates last 4? Some but not thousands or millions. Those elderly people would also need to be at that address. Then of course there is the reward/risk lack of balance I mentioned before.

How in god’s name would a person possibly get that many ballots? There is no precedent for a case of voter fraud like that.
 
If you want to double vote:
1. You vote legally under your own name.
2. Where no voter or Photo ID is required, you vote for the college student who used to live in your house--you know his name, birthdate, address, last four numbers of his SS#
3. Same with your elderly relatives who passed in the last few years.
4. You vote for your friend who is comatose in the nursing home.
In which of the contested states is Voter ID not required?

Georgia? Nope! Sorry. Voter ID is required.

Arizona? Nope! Sorry. Voter ID is required.


But let's pretend your brilliant master plan worked.

You got to cast, what, four extra votes?

Golly! That could throw the entire election! :laughing0301:

And you only had to risk prison to do it.
 
They kicked out the observers, then dragged out tens of thousands of ballots from concealment and counted them numerous times....You don't even need narration of that security footage to see that's what was done.

In Philly, "observers" were kept in a fenced-in cage, as far as 50 yards from where ballots were being counted.

In Detroit, observers were not let back into the counting area after bathroom and lunch breaks, then pizza boxes were taped up over the windows, so nobody could see what was going on.

All of this is confirmed by phone videos and hundreds of eye withnesses....But we're supposed to believe a deranged, gaslighting, fucking moonbat lunatic -i.e, you- over all of that.


Yeah....Go fuck yourself.

Moron, had ballots been scanned multiple times, there would have been more votes than voters. That did not happen. Example, let's say 100,000 people voted. There would be 100,000 votes. Now let's say they scanned 25,000 ballots twice... then there would be 100,000 voters but 125,000 votes.

Savvy?

Tards gotta tard.
 

Forum List

Back
Top