- Jun 29, 2013
- 23,211
- 15,373
- 1,405
And has a huge carbon footprint.Why increase the use and creation of coal methane and oil to build "green" energy that is the least efficient use of these materials?
Green energy is very wasteful
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And has a huge carbon footprint.Why increase the use and creation of coal methane and oil to build "green" energy that is the least efficient use of these materials?
Green energy is very wasteful
LOLWhy increase the use and creation of coal methane and oil to build "green" energy that is the least efficient use of these materials?
Green energy is very wasteful
Just like Algore and all the other bed wetter elitist sociopaths that push the climate hoax, Turd Catcher knows everything he posts is complete and total bullshit but they laugh everytime they cash a check by spreading leftist agitprop.
And that's why we need to access sources where hydrogen is already concentrated and can be readily extracted, ala hydrocarbons. And that takes us right back to petroleum. Now, solar powered water processors can free hydrogen from water, but it remains to be seen if it can ever be cost effective to do it that way.It actually takes more energy to isolate hydrogen than you get from burning it.
“More energy is needed to isolate hydrogen from natural compounds than can ever be recovered from its use,” Bossel explains to PhysOrg.com
I propose we build a stargate to a hydrogen dust cloud somewhere thereabouts and simply import it from out there!And that's why we need to access sources where hydrogen is already concentrated and can be readily extracted, ala hydrocarbons. And that takes us right back to petroleum. Now, solar powered water processors can free hydrogen from water, but it remains to be seen if it can ever be cost effective to do it that way.
There is no free lunch.
Yeah?Running from June to October in Quebec, the Coradia iLint will be North America's first hydrogen train.:
We can get hydrogen from the sun. We just have to send AOC up there at night.I propose we build a stargate to a hydrogen dust cloud somewhere thereabouts and simply import it from out there!
Better yet we could send missions to the Sun and scoop some fresh hydrogen for use back here on earth. I mean the sun has all this hydrogen to give away....why should we turn it down?
Jo
Hydrogen is everywhere, that's not the problem. The problem is getting it concentrated enough to use, and right now, probably the cleanest way to do that is to electrically crack water using solar or nuclear power.I propose we build a stargate to a hydrogen dust cloud somewhere thereabouts and simply import it from out there!
Shortly before the end of human history, which is also the time socialism is scheduled to actually "work".Yeah?
How's the scalability on this?
Here's 12,000 horsepower pulling about 12,000 tons of coal and hoppers for 560 miles across the rocky mountains
When can we expect your H2 locomotives to take over this service?
View attachment 790451
View attachment 790452
Yes I know I was being facetious. While we certainly have an abundance of hydrogen here I don't think anyone's discovered a way to economically separate it from all the other elements it's attached to. You can drive it out of Coal with a hot steam method but then you create massive amounts of carbon slurry and just exactly what are you going to do with that stuff? Also how do you generate the heat? We certainly can't use hydrogen because that would defeat your purpose. It would take more hydrogen to maintain the heat then you would be releasing in terms of converted BTU units. Electrolysis is another very entropic process. Last I looked at it It takes roughly twice the amount electrical energy in terms of converted BTUs to release about half as much from the water. That type of entropy is not sustainable.Hydrogen is everywhere, that's not the problem. The problem is getting it concentrated enough to use, and right now, probably the cleanest way to do that is to electrically crack water using solar or nuclear power.
Solar is not cost effective, so that is the answer.And that's why we need to access sources where hydrogen is already concentrated and can be readily extracted, ala hydrocarbons. And that takes us right back to petroleum. Now, solar powered water processors can free hydrogen from water, but it remains to be seen if it can ever be cost effective to do it that way.
There is no free lunch.
Do you have any hopes for fusion as in Tokomak?Solar is not cost effective, so that is the answer.
Nuclear is the only way.
Why for, we have fissionDo you have any hopes for fusion as in Tokomak?
And the costs to create the hydrogen is?
Spoiler alert: it ain't cheap.