Spare_change
Gold Member
- Jun 27, 2011
- 8,690
- 1,293
- 280
If you offer $200 of anything, you already have a nanny state.We shouldn't expect it. We should require it.I have a friend who works at a grocery & she says the ebt people can buy tons of sugar crap drinks & snacks with zero nutritional value.
Ive seen people I know who are on crack/heroin swapping food for cash so they can buy more drugs. There's definitely problems. But bringing canned crapola to distribution centers limits the transportation issue and sheer amount of food say an elderly or disabled person can carry. Not to mention a rise in disease that eating more processed food will cause.
Kill kill kill kill kill the poor......
The overall diet of the American people is a disaster (myself included)
Why should we expect the poor to do any better?
If they're getting it free, the givers hold the strings. And since the givers are the same people getting stuck with the tab of poor sick people, it would behoove said givers to require standards of food least likely to render the poor sick.
It's called logic. So few in government are acquainted with the concept.
I really don't care
To me....200 bucks a month is 200 bucks a month
I don't care if you spend it on healthy organic food or $200 worth of Doritos
What do you want? A nanny state?