God... Is Time.

[G.T.]

The op argument is resolved, it was nonsensical.

 

[Boss]

The op argument is resolved, it was nonsensical.

LOL... Yes, because your excellent trolling and insulting skills and over-sized brain allows you to dismiss physics as nonsensical!

The moment of present time cannot be observed. Your perceptions are bound by physics which requires time to happen. You've not refuted this argument and you can't. So you and several others have decided to use the Saul Alinsky tactic of repeating your lie over and over until it becomes truth. This has gone on for over a week and you still persist. None of you have presented a suitable counter argument and you can't, that's why you keep trolling.

 

[BreezeWood]

.
there is no other time than the present that is observed, it is the OP who troll's in fallacies.

.

 

[Boss]

.
there is no other time than the present that is observed, it is the OP who troll's in fallacies.

.

Observe... The Past!

 

[PixieStix]

God is eternity. Eternity has no time

 

[Boss]

"there is no other time than the present that is observed"

The point of present time can never be observed, physics must happen first and physics requires time passing. You do not observe the present, you perceive the present after the present has passed and is gone forever. All your observations are in the past before you can perceive them.

 

[Hollie]

The op argument is resolved, it was nonsensical.

LOL... Yes, because your excellent trolling and insulting skills and over-sized brain allows you to dismiss physics as nonsensical!

The moment of present time cannot be observed. Your perceptions are bound by physics which requires time to happen. You've not refuted this argument and you can't. So you and several others have decided to use the Saul Alinsky tactic of repeating your lie over and over until it becomes truth. This has gone on for over a week and you still persist. None of you have presented a suitable counter argument and you can't, that's why you keep trolling.

The moment of the present certainly can be observed.

You take issue with that specifically because you need a gap to spackle your gawds into.

 

[Hollie]

God is eternity. Eternity has no time

Most gawds, yes. Your gawds, not so much.

 

[PixieStix]

God is eternity. Eternity has no time

Most gawds, yes. Your gawds, not so much.

Oh good gawd

 

[Boss]

The moment of the present certainly can be observed.

It certainly can't unless you've found a way to defy physics.

 

[edthecynic]

.
there is no other time than the present that is observed, it is the OP who troll's in fallacies.

.

Observe... The Past!

It was the present when that photo was taken.

 

[edthecynic]

"there is no other time than the present that is observed"

The point of present time can never be observed, physics must happen first and physics requires time passing. You do not observe the present, you perceive the present after the present has passed and is gone forever. All your observations are in the past before you can perceive them.

Again , you admit we observe the present after a delay, but it was undeniably the present we were observing. Just because an ensuing series of presents have past while your brain is processing the present you observed does not mean that you need faith to observe the present you are observing.

 

[Boss]

.
there is no other time than the present that is observed, it is the OP who troll's in fallacies.

.

Observe... The Past!

It was the present when that photo was taken.

Well, no it wasn't because physics had to happen and that took time. The photo was taken in the past not the present. All our ability to observe is in the past, forever and always, unless we find a way to defy physics.

 

[Boss]

"there is no other time than the present that is observed"

The point of present time can never be observed, physics must happen first and physics requires time passing. You do not observe the present, you perceive the present after the present has passed and is gone forever. All your observations are in the past before you can perceive them.

Again , you admit we observe the present after a delay, but it was undeniably the present we were observing. Just because an ensuing series of presents have past while your brain is processing the present you observed does not mean that you need faith to observe the present you are observing.

No, I admitted no such thing because it's not true. You have a perception occurring in the past due to physics and you assume this perception depicts the present as it was when it happened. You can't prove it because you can't observe the present. You can falsely make the claim, you can repeat that for hundreds of posts and through dozens of pages, and you can even get other morons to thank your posts and agree with your false assumptions. But physics doesn't lie and can't be overcome.

 

[Boss]

...but it was undeniably the present we were observing.

This is your faith-based assumption but you cannot prove it with science. You did not "observe" the present, you had a perception of it after the present passed. It is not physically possible for you to observe the actual present. Physics HAS TO HAPPEN and that takes TIME.

 

[BreezeWood]

...physics must happen first and physics requires time passing

.
yours is a red herring, no physics is involved nor does physics require a passing of time ...

you misinterpret the Apex as being a matter of faith -

.

 

[Hollie]

The moment of the present certainly can be observed.

It certainly can't unless you've found a way to defy physics.

There's no need to defy physics. I simply need to point out that your argument is structured around your need to promote your religious dogma as opposed to recognizing a reality based worldview.

Sorry. My carma just ran over your dogma.

 

[Boss]

nor does physics require a passing of time

Well... YES IT DOES! You simply can't show me anything with physics that doesn't require time passing.

 

[Boss]

There's no need to defy physics.

To believe YOUR bullshit, we have to suspend physics.

 

[PostmodernProph]

and all that because you're having difficulty understanding a philosophical discussion about science?

I have no trouble understanding it at all.

That is just the johnnies on the ice cream.

googled that one too......like before, only you came up......