Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Where did I say she was ahead only because of super delegates? What I did say was that super delegates are different from regular delegates in the Democratic Party. So please get angry about more made up delusions.Sure. Being chosen is winning. Ask any beauty pageant winner. Of course, the other nominees are chosen as well, and in the same manner. The only difference is that Republican and Democratic delegates, except for Democratic super-delegates, are voted for.Gary Johnson wins Libertarian presidential nomination at party convention - CNNPolitics.comLibertarians on Sunday selected former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson as their party's presidential nominee, at their party convention in Orlando, Florida.
Johnson was the party's nominee in 2012 and once again won the position despite backlash from the party's more radical Libertarian wing.
In the first round of voting, Johnson reached 49.5 percent of the vote, according to the official party total, just shy of the majority needed for victory. His nearest opponents, Austin Petersen and John McAfee, reached 21 and 14 percent respectively. On the second round of voting, Johnson clinched the nomination with 55.8 percent of the vote.
The Libertarian Party retains its status as a backup plan for failed Republican politicians by nominating Johnson again, and likely nominating Bill Weld for his running mate. At this point, it's time for the Libertarian Party to rebrand since they seem to be more interested in nominating Republican cast-offs than anybody interested in libertarianism.
Wins? Was there a primary?
He was chosen, which is fine. But he also didn't have to go through the process the other candidates did.
She isn't ahead because of super delegates. She's ahead because she had more votes and a lot more pledge delegates.
But please tell more lies.
No, but I'd be happy to read your perspective on the process, princess.Seriously? Do you need an education as to what the primary process is?
Don't bother others with really ignorant questions.
LOL. If gov't says this person can come over and that person cant then that is control over people.So you don't get that asking the government's permission just to cross a border represents control? Or do you think human rights somehow stop at the border?So you believe in gov't control. Got it.I'm a libertarian and I can't vote for Johnson. He's an open borders guy and his VP is a gun control advocate.
I'll vote like bertarian locally as always but I can't justify voting for Johnson.
Most so called libertarians are merely statists who want to smoke weed.
Do you have the slightest clue as to what you are babbling about?
Where in that post of mine does it tell you I'm for government control? Where exactly is your reading comprehension failing you?
That is not government control of its citizens, it's control of its borders which is one of the few legitimate duties of the government. Got it now?
What part of the Constitution authortizes Immigration restrictions?
LOL. If gov't says this person can come over and that person cant then that is control over people.So you don't get that asking the government's permission just to cross a border represents control? Or do you think human rights somehow stop at the border?So you believe in gov't control. Got it.I'm a libertarian and I can't vote for Johnson. He's an open borders guy and his VP is a gun control advocate.
I'll vote like bertarian locally as always but I can't justify voting for Johnson.
Most so called libertarians are merely statists who want to smoke weed.
Do you have the slightest clue as to what you are babbling about?
Where in that post of mine does it tell you I'm for government control? Where exactly is your reading comprehension failing you?
That is not government control of its citizens, it's control of its borders which is one of the few legitimate duties of the government. Got it now?
What part of the Constitution authortizes Immigration restrictions?
Gary Johnson and William Weld?
Shouldn't they call it the RINOtarian Party?
I doubt he needs an education but you sure as hell do, "counselor."What process did the other candidates go through? Isn't it up to each political party to select their own candidates?Wins? Was there a primary?
He was chosen, which is fine. But he also didn't have to go through the process the other candidates did.
Seriously? Do you need an education as to what the primary process is?
Don't bother others with really ignorant questions.
You are missing that "human right" thing. OR do you believe only American citizens have human rights?LOL. If gov't says this person can come over and that person cant then that is control over people.So you don't get that asking the government's permission just to cross a border represents control? Or do you think human rights somehow stop at the border?So you believe in gov't control. Got it.
Most so called libertarians are merely statists who want to smoke weed.
Do you have the slightest clue as to what you are babbling about?
Where in that post of mine does it tell you I'm for government control? Where exactly is your reading comprehension failing you?
That is not government control of its citizens, it's control of its borders which is one of the few legitimate duties of the government. Got it now?
What part of the Constitution authortizes Immigration restrictions?
Your reading comprehension difficulties are giving you problems. It is not US Citizens who are being prevented from crossing. Immigration and control of the borders is a legitimate government duty. As a citizen, I can cross the border as much as I want to. How is that hard for you to understand?
You are missing that "human right" thing. OR do you believe only American citizens have human rights?LOL. If gov't says this person can come over and that person cant then that is control over people.So you don't get that asking the government's permission just to cross a border represents control? Or do you think human rights somehow stop at the border?Do you have the slightest clue as to what you are babbling about?
Where in that post of mine does it tell you I'm for government control? Where exactly is your reading comprehension failing you?
That is not government control of its citizens, it's control of its borders which is one of the few legitimate duties of the government. Got it now?
What part of the Constitution authortizes Immigration restrictions?
Your reading comprehension difficulties are giving you problems. It is not US Citizens who are being prevented from crossing. Immigration and control of the borders is a legitimate government duty. As a citizen, I can cross the border as much as I want to. How is that hard for you to understand?
And agai where in the constitution is border patrol authorized?
Yes you are a statist and opposed to freedom. Which is what I said previously.You are missing that "human right" thing. OR do you believe only American citizens have human rights?LOL. If gov't says this person can come over and that person cant then that is control over people.So you don't get that asking the government's permission just to cross a border represents control? Or do you think human rights somehow stop at the border?
That is not government control of its citizens, it's control of its borders which is one of the few legitimate duties of the government. Got it now?
What part of the Constitution authortizes Immigration restrictions?
Your reading comprehension difficulties are giving you problems. It is not US Citizens who are being prevented from crossing. Immigration and control of the borders is a legitimate government duty. As a citizen, I can cross the border as much as I want to. How is that hard for you to understand?
And agai where in the constitution is border patrol authorized?
As I said, I'm for the government controlling immigration. Does that clear it up for you?
Jillian thinks that just because her candidate was handed the nomination by a group of corrupt super delegates. That = a process .What process did the other candidates go through? Isn't it up to each political party to select their own candidates?Wins? Was there a primary?
He was chosen, which is fine. But he also didn't have to go through the process the other candidates did.
Jillian thinks that just because her candidate was handed the nomination by a group of corrupt super delegates. That = a process .What process did the other candidates go through? Isn't it up to each political party to select their own candidates?Wins? Was there a primary?
He was chosen, which is fine. But he also didn't have to go through the process the other candidates did.
To put it mildly.Jillian thinks that just because her candidate was handed the nomination by a group of corrupt super delegates. That = a process .What process did the other candidates go through? Isn't it up to each political party to select their own candidates?Wins? Was there a primary?
He was chosen, which is fine. But he also didn't have to go through the process the other candidates did.
She's such a bitch with a capital B. Lol.
Yes you are a statist and opposed to freedom. Which is what I said previously.You are missing that "human right" thing. OR do you believe only American citizens have human rights?LOL. If gov't says this person can come over and that person cant then that is control over people.That is not government control of its citizens, it's control of its borders which is one of the few legitimate duties of the government. Got it now?
What part of the Constitution authortizes Immigration restrictions?
Your reading comprehension difficulties are giving you problems. It is not US Citizens who are being prevented from crossing. Immigration and control of the borders is a legitimate government duty. As a citizen, I can cross the border as much as I want to. How is that hard for you to understand?
And agai where in the constitution is border patrol authorized?
As I said, I'm for the government controlling immigration. Does that clear it up for you?
Jillian thinks that just because her candidate was handed the nomination by a group of corrupt super delegates. That = a process .What process did the other candidates go through? Isn't it up to each political party to select their own candidates?Wins? Was there a primary?
He was chosen, which is fine. But he also didn't have to go through the process the other candidates did.
Jillian thinks that just because her candidate was handed the nomination by a group of corrupt super delegates. That = a process .What process did the other candidates go through? Isn't it up to each political party to select their own candidates?Wins? Was there a primary?
He was chosen, which is fine. But he also didn't have to go through the process the other candidates did.
She's such a bitch with a capital B. Lol.
Must be why Hillary had pledged super delegates one year before the first vote was even cast.Jillian thinks that just because her candidate was handed the nomination by a group of corrupt super delegates. That = a process .What process did the other candidates go through? Isn't it up to each political party to select their own candidates?Wins? Was there a primary?
He was chosen, which is fine. But he also didn't have to go through the process the other candidates did.
no, idiota. my candidate got a lot more votes. and my candidate is a democrat...unlike her opponent.
i understand you lack comprehension or any sense of reality. i dont much care, but you should since you embarrass yourself every time you post.
Jillian thinks that just because her candidate was handed the nomination by a group of corrupt super delegates. That = a process .What process did the other candidates go through? Isn't it up to each political party to select their own candidates?Wins? Was there a primary?
He was chosen, which is fine. But he also didn't have to go through the process the other candidates did.
She's such a bitch with a capital B. Lol.
only to bitches. *shrug*
but thanks for trolling by.
and the moron still doesn't understand that it's not about super delegates, she won pledge delegates.
try fact-based reality.
Jillian thinks that just because her candidate was handed the nomination by a group of corrupt super delegates. That = a process .What process did the other candidates go through? Isn't it up to each political party to select their own candidates?Wins? Was there a primary?
He was chosen, which is fine. But he also didn't have to go through the process the other candidates did.
She's such a bitch with a capital B. Lol.
only to bitches. *shrug*
but thanks for trolling by.
and the moron still doesn't understand that it's not about super delegates, she won pledge delegates.
try fact-based reality.
Because dishonest hags like Hillary and Jillian must stick together.Jillian thinks that just because her candidate was handed the nomination by a group of corrupt super delegates. That = a process .What process did the other candidates go through? Isn't it up to each political party to select their own candidates?Wins? Was there a primary?
He was chosen, which is fine. But he also didn't have to go through the process the other candidates did.
She's such a bitch with a capital B. Lol.
only to bitches. *shrug*
but thanks for trolling by.
and the moron still doesn't understand that it's not about super delegates, she won pledge delegates.
try fact-based reality.
Hillary sucks. Why would anyone want such a dishonest hag being the POTUS?
