Feds Seek Felony Charges Against David Petraeus

1000.jpg


Politicians stand by David Petraeus despite FBI leaks inquiry

Former CIA director is suspected of same crime as Edward Snowden yet enjoys the backing of Hillary Clinton, John McCain and other high-profile critics of leaks.

Though under investigation by the FBI for unauthorized disclosure of classified information related to an affair with his biographer, David Petraeus counts among his defenders a host of prominent politicians who typically denounce security leaks.

The former US army general and Central Intelligence Agency director has deep ties to a bipartisan host of political heavyweights, from potential Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton to former Republican presidential nominee John McCain, and a well of media support stemming from his stewardship of the 2007-08 Iraq troop surge. Many have raced to support Petraeus in the days since word emerged that the most acclaimed military officer of his generation might face felony charges.

More: Politicians stand by David Petraeus despite FBI leaks inquiry - The Guardian

It appears that traitor Petraeus has deep bipartisan support. Don't they care about our national security?
 
1000.jpg


Politicians stand by David Petraeus despite FBI leaks inquiry

Former CIA director is suspected of same crime as Edward Snowden yet enjoys the backing of Hillary Clinton, John McCain and other high-profile critics of leaks.

Though under investigation by the FBI for unauthorized disclosure of classified information related to an affair with his biographer, David Petraeus counts among his defenders a host of prominent politicians who typically denounce security leaks.

The former US army general and Central Intelligence Agency director has deep ties to a bipartisan host of political heavyweights, from potential Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton to former Republican presidential nominee John McCain, and a well of media support stemming from his stewardship of the 2007-08 Iraq troop surge. Many have raced to support Petraeus in the days since word emerged that the most acclaimed military officer of his generation might face felony charges.

More: Politicians stand by David Petraeus despite FBI leaks inquiry - The Guardian

It appears that traitor Petraeus has deep bipartisan support. Don't they care about our national security?
Proving national security was actually jeopardized will prove to be an uphill battle. He didn't actually give out any secrets. If there is any traitor it's you Leftists who routinely leak secret information when you think you can score political points.
 
1000.jpg


Politicians stand by David Petraeus despite FBI leaks inquiry

Former CIA director is suspected of same crime as Edward Snowden yet enjoys the backing of Hillary Clinton, John McCain and other high-profile critics of leaks.

Though under investigation by the FBI for unauthorized disclosure of classified information related to an affair with his biographer, David Petraeus counts among his defenders a host of prominent politicians who typically denounce security leaks.

The former US army general and Central Intelligence Agency director has deep ties to a bipartisan host of political heavyweights, from potential Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton to former Republican presidential nominee John McCain, and a well of media support stemming from his stewardship of the 2007-08 Iraq troop surge. Many have raced to support Petraeus in the days since word emerged that the most acclaimed military officer of his generation might face felony charges.

More: Politicians stand by David Petraeus despite FBI leaks inquiry - The Guardian

It appears that traitor Petraeus has deep bipartisan support. Don't they care about our national security?
Proving national security was actually jeopardized will prove to be an uphill battle. He didn't actually give out any secrets. If there is any traitor it's you Leftists who routinely leak secret information when you think you can score political points.

How do you know "he didn't actually give out any secrets" - without a thorough investigation? Did he allow his mistress, Paula Broadwell, to have access to classified/sensitive national security information? We don't know...
 
1000.jpg


Politicians stand by David Petraeus despite FBI leaks inquiry

Former CIA director is suspected of same crime as Edward Snowden yet enjoys the backing of Hillary Clinton, John McCain and other high-profile critics of leaks.

Though under investigation by the FBI for unauthorized disclosure of classified information related to an affair with his biographer, David Petraeus counts among his defenders a host of prominent politicians who typically denounce security leaks.

The former US army general and Central Intelligence Agency director has deep ties to a bipartisan host of political heavyweights, from potential Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton to former Republican presidential nominee John McCain, and a well of media support stemming from his stewardship of the 2007-08 Iraq troop surge. Many have raced to support Petraeus in the days since word emerged that the most acclaimed military officer of his generation might face felony charges.

More: Politicians stand by David Petraeus despite FBI leaks inquiry - The Guardian

It appears that traitor Petraeus has deep bipartisan support. Don't they care about our national security?
Proving national security was actually jeopardized will prove to be an uphill battle. He didn't actually give out any secrets. If there is any traitor it's you Leftists who routinely leak secret information when you think you can score political points.

How do you know "he didn't actually give out any secrets" - without a thorough investigation? Did he allow his mistress, Paula Broadwell, to have access to classified/sensitive national security information? We don't know...
You're right. You don't know. But you call him a traitor, somebody who's done more for this country than you can fathom in your spoiled brat ignorance. On behalf of the military and all real patriots, fuck you.
 
Complicating matters is that as a military intelligence officer, Paula Broadwell had her own top secret clearance. Whatever information she had she was authorized to have. The question is how she obtained the information she was authorized to have.

The relevance of Paula Broadwell s security clearance 8211 CNN Security Clearance - CNN.com Blogs
There is a difference between having a clearance and having a need to know. A clearance in no way authorizes you to every piece of information that has that level of classification.

If Petraeus gave her access to his official CIA email, then that is a serious violation. One which would result in a court-martial for anyone of lower rank.
 
Complicating matters is that as a military intelligence officer, Paula Broadwell had her own top secret clearance. Whatever information she had she was authorized to have. The question is how she obtained the information she was authorized to have.

The relevance of Paula Broadwell s security clearance 8211 CNN Security Clearance - CNN.com Blogs
There is a difference between having a clearance and having a need to know. A clearance in no way authorizes you to every piece of information that has that level of classification.

If Petraeus gave her access to his official CIA email, then that is a serious violation. One which would result in a court-martial for anyone of lower rank.

As someone who once held a top secret security clearance in the military - I totally agree.
 
Complicating matters is that as a military intelligence officer, Paula Broadwell had her own top secret clearance. Whatever information she had she was authorized to have. The question is how she obtained the information she was authorized to have.

The relevance of Paula Broadwell s security clearance 8211 CNN Security Clearance - CNN.com Blogs
There is a difference between having a clearance and having a need to know. A clearance in no way authorizes you to every piece of information that has that level of classification.

If Petraeus gave her access to his official CIA email, then that is a serious violation. One which would result in a court-martial for anyone of lower rank.
Does a soldier of lower rank have the same security clearance?
 
Complicating matters is that as a military intelligence officer, Paula Broadwell had her own top secret clearance. Whatever information she had she was authorized to have. The question is how she obtained the information she was authorized to have.

The relevance of Paula Broadwell s security clearance 8211 CNN Security Clearance - CNN.com Blogs
There is a difference between having a clearance and having a need to know. A clearance in no way authorizes you to every piece of information that has that level of classification.

If Petraeus gave her access to his official CIA email, then that is a serious violation. One which would result in a court-martial for anyone of lower rank.
Every piece of information Paula Broadwell had in her possession she had a right to have as a military intelligence officer with a top secret clearance. The question is how she got that information. She could easily have had it as a matter of her own clearance and still come into further possession of the same information as a result of her relationship.

The campaign against Petraeus is coming from George Soros.
 
The investigation has been going on for two years so far.

Eric Holder's justice department is expert in investigations that never end.
 
WASHINGTON, Jan 9 (Reuters) - The FBI and Justice Department prosecutors have recommended bringing criminal charges against former CIA chief David Petraeus for improperly providing classified information to a female Army Reserve officer with whom he was having an affair, the New York Times reported on Friday.

The newspaper cited officials who spoke on condition of anonymity. The Justice Department investigation focuses on whether Petraeus gave the woman, Paula Broadwell, access to his CIA email account and other highly classified information. The Times said officials have recommended felony charges.

The recommendations leave U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder with a decision to make on whether to seek an indictment against Petraeus, who quit his CIA post in 2012 after the extramarital affair became publicly known. Petraeus also is one of the leading U.S. military commanders in recent times, having served as commander of American forces in both Iraq and Afghanistan.

More: U.S. Seeks Criminal Charges Against David Petraeus - New York Times

David Petraeus is obviously a smart man - so why did he act so stupid regarding Paula Broadwell? Amore?
Ask Gary hart, Bill Clinton...

sad news. very sad
 

Forum List

Back
Top