- Thread starter
- #141
Petraeus' poor family values and poor judgement put our national security at risk.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Proving national security was actually jeopardized will prove to be an uphill battle. He didn't actually give out any secrets. If there is any traitor it's you Leftists who routinely leak secret information when you think you can score political points.
Politicians stand by David Petraeus despite FBI leaks inquiry
Former CIA director is suspected of same crime as Edward Snowden yet enjoys the backing of Hillary Clinton, John McCain and other high-profile critics of leaks.
Though under investigation by the FBI for unauthorized disclosure of classified information related to an affair with his biographer, David Petraeus counts among his defenders a host of prominent politicians who typically denounce security leaks.
The former US army general and Central Intelligence Agency director has deep ties to a bipartisan host of political heavyweights, from potential Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton to former Republican presidential nominee John McCain, and a well of media support stemming from his stewardship of the 2007-08 Iraq troop surge. Many have raced to support Petraeus in the days since word emerged that the most acclaimed military officer of his generation might face felony charges.
More: Politicians stand by David Petraeus despite FBI leaks inquiry - The Guardian
It appears that traitor Petraeus has deep bipartisan support. Don't they care about our national security?
Proving national security was actually jeopardized will prove to be an uphill battle. He didn't actually give out any secrets. If there is any traitor it's you Leftists who routinely leak secret information when you think you can score political points.
Politicians stand by David Petraeus despite FBI leaks inquiry
Former CIA director is suspected of same crime as Edward Snowden yet enjoys the backing of Hillary Clinton, John McCain and other high-profile critics of leaks.
Though under investigation by the FBI for unauthorized disclosure of classified information related to an affair with his biographer, David Petraeus counts among his defenders a host of prominent politicians who typically denounce security leaks.
The former US army general and Central Intelligence Agency director has deep ties to a bipartisan host of political heavyweights, from potential Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton to former Republican presidential nominee John McCain, and a well of media support stemming from his stewardship of the 2007-08 Iraq troop surge. Many have raced to support Petraeus in the days since word emerged that the most acclaimed military officer of his generation might face felony charges.
More: Politicians stand by David Petraeus despite FBI leaks inquiry - The Guardian
It appears that traitor Petraeus has deep bipartisan support. Don't they care about our national security?
You're right. You don't know. But you call him a traitor, somebody who's done more for this country than you can fathom in your spoiled brat ignorance. On behalf of the military and all real patriots, fuck you.Proving national security was actually jeopardized will prove to be an uphill battle. He didn't actually give out any secrets. If there is any traitor it's you Leftists who routinely leak secret information when you think you can score political points.
Politicians stand by David Petraeus despite FBI leaks inquiry
Former CIA director is suspected of same crime as Edward Snowden yet enjoys the backing of Hillary Clinton, John McCain and other high-profile critics of leaks.
Though under investigation by the FBI for unauthorized disclosure of classified information related to an affair with his biographer, David Petraeus counts among his defenders a host of prominent politicians who typically denounce security leaks.
The former US army general and Central Intelligence Agency director has deep ties to a bipartisan host of political heavyweights, from potential Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton to former Republican presidential nominee John McCain, and a well of media support stemming from his stewardship of the 2007-08 Iraq troop surge. Many have raced to support Petraeus in the days since word emerged that the most acclaimed military officer of his generation might face felony charges.
More: Politicians stand by David Petraeus despite FBI leaks inquiry - The Guardian
It appears that traitor Petraeus has deep bipartisan support. Don't they care about our national security?
How do you know "he didn't actually give out any secrets" - without a thorough investigation? Did he allow his mistress, Paula Broadwell, to have access to classified/sensitive national security information? We don't know...
There is a difference between having a clearance and having a need to know. A clearance in no way authorizes you to every piece of information that has that level of classification.Complicating matters is that as a military intelligence officer, Paula Broadwell had her own top secret clearance. Whatever information she had she was authorized to have. The question is how she obtained the information she was authorized to have.
The relevance of Paula Broadwell s security clearance 8211 CNN Security Clearance - CNN.com Blogs
There is a difference between having a clearance and having a need to know. A clearance in no way authorizes you to every piece of information that has that level of classification.Complicating matters is that as a military intelligence officer, Paula Broadwell had her own top secret clearance. Whatever information she had she was authorized to have. The question is how she obtained the information she was authorized to have.
The relevance of Paula Broadwell s security clearance 8211 CNN Security Clearance - CNN.com Blogs
If Petraeus gave her access to his official CIA email, then that is a serious violation. One which would result in a court-martial for anyone of lower rank.
Does a soldier of lower rank have the same security clearance?There is a difference between having a clearance and having a need to know. A clearance in no way authorizes you to every piece of information that has that level of classification.Complicating matters is that as a military intelligence officer, Paula Broadwell had her own top secret clearance. Whatever information she had she was authorized to have. The question is how she obtained the information she was authorized to have.
The relevance of Paula Broadwell s security clearance 8211 CNN Security Clearance - CNN.com Blogs
If Petraeus gave her access to his official CIA email, then that is a serious violation. One which would result in a court-martial for anyone of lower rank.
Every piece of information Paula Broadwell had in her possession she had a right to have as a military intelligence officer with a top secret clearance. The question is how she got that information. She could easily have had it as a matter of her own clearance and still come into further possession of the same information as a result of her relationship.There is a difference between having a clearance and having a need to know. A clearance in no way authorizes you to every piece of information that has that level of classification.Complicating matters is that as a military intelligence officer, Paula Broadwell had her own top secret clearance. Whatever information she had she was authorized to have. The question is how she obtained the information she was authorized to have.
The relevance of Paula Broadwell s security clearance 8211 CNN Security Clearance - CNN.com Blogs
If Petraeus gave her access to his official CIA email, then that is a serious violation. One which would result in a court-martial for anyone of lower rank.
Leftist wing war on women continues.Lying women!! Bill Clinton is a saint!!.
Ask Gary hart, Bill Clinton...WASHINGTON, Jan 9 (Reuters) - The FBI and Justice Department prosecutors have recommended bringing criminal charges against former CIA chief David Petraeus for improperly providing classified information to a female Army Reserve officer with whom he was having an affair, the New York Times reported on Friday.
The newspaper cited officials who spoke on condition of anonymity. The Justice Department investigation focuses on whether Petraeus gave the woman, Paula Broadwell, access to his CIA email account and other highly classified information. The Times said officials have recommended felony charges.
The recommendations leave U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder with a decision to make on whether to seek an indictment against Petraeus, who quit his CIA post in 2012 after the extramarital affair became publicly known. Petraeus also is one of the leading U.S. military commanders in recent times, having served as commander of American forces in both Iraq and Afghanistan.
More: U.S. Seeks Criminal Charges Against David Petraeus - New York Times
David Petraeus is obviously a smart man - so why did he act so stupid regarding Paula Broadwell? Amore?
Ahh, human nature and arrested development. The man spent too much time in academiaPetraeus' brain should have overruled his dick.
Nah...I don't rape women...I love on umLeftist wing war on women continues.Lying women!! Bill Clinton is a saint!!.
Duly noted you couldn't address the point.
tell you what, I'll offer every woman you ever encountered a bag full of money to talk shit about you. Betcha I'd find takers.