Lesh
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2016
- 67,581
- 33,502
- 2,300
Because Democrats are about substance...Why? Because Democrats are ugly?If you're voting on looks you might as well be a Republican
You walked into that one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Because Democrats are about substance...Why? Because Democrats are ugly?If you're voting on looks you might as well be a Republican
You walked into that one.
Don't look now Dems, but you have a "dissenter" in the ranks that MUST be muzzled and chained. And even WORSE -- she MIGHT be a "closet Libertarian"... Even if she is NOT -- she's definitely "standing out" as an INDEPENDENT voice in the party.. And the first actually smart candidate to declare..
Sure -- the Party chiefs are mad about her not wanting to add Assad to the list of mid-east bastard tyrants that we have disposed. Called her an Assad puppet, not because she SUPPORTS him, but because she knows the insanity of removing tyrants in the Mid East.
But the MAJOR reason she needs to be whacked is that she publicly spoke out about Sgt Debbie Whatzhername Schultz and her antics that tipped the DNC support against Uncle Bernie. And Tulsi Gabbart had the honor of RESIGNING from the DNC... A move NO FUTURE party Dem nominee ought to make..
Don't care if this interview was on Fox. Greenwald is the last of REAL journalism in this world. And has my total respect. WATCH the 3.4 minutes for a list of how Gabbart "offended" her own party...
LMFAO!!!!Why? Because Democrats are ugly?If you're voting on looks you might as well be a Republican
You walked into that one.
Except I did, as his terms were non consecutive, just as the 53rd Superbowl champion may be a repeat champion. It's a pretty simple explanation that I think pretty much everyone understands without need for further explanation than what has already been stated.Whelp --- you posted that it was neither bizarre nor hard to explain but you didn't explain it.
Well then...I just gotta ask...WHY in the HELL did ya'll run HILLARY in 2016??????Because Democrats are about substance...Why? Because Democrats are ugly?If you're voting on looks you might as well be a Republican
You walked into that one.
Because Democrats are about substance...Why? Because Democrats are ugly?If you're voting on looks you might as well be a Republican
You walked into that one.
Nor does calling the chanpion of the 53rd Superbowl "the 53rd Superbowl champion" split one team into two.Again, there's nothing about a nonconsecutive term that makes a person into two people.
Don't look now Dems, but you have a "dissenter" in the ranks that MUST be muzzled and chained. And even WORSE -- she MIGHT be a "closet Libertarian"... Even if she is NOT -- she's definitely "standing out" as an INDEPENDENT voice in the party.. And the first actually smart candidate to declare..
Sure -- the Party chiefs are mad about her not wanting to add Assad to the list of mid-east bastard tyrants that we have disposed. Called her an Assad puppet, not because she SUPPORTS him, but because she knows the insanity of removing tyrants in the Mid East.
But the MAJOR reason she needs to be whacked is that she publicly spoke out about Sgt Debbie Whatzhername Schultz and her antics that tipped the DNC support against Uncle Bernie. And Tulsi Gabbart had the honor of RESIGNING from the DNC... A move NO FUTURE party Dem nominee ought to make..
Don't care if this interview was on Fox. Greenwald is the last of REAL journalism in this world. And has my total respect. WATCH the 3.4 minutes for a list of how Gabbart "offended" her own party...
You should at least learn to spell her last name correctly. It's Gabbard - not Gabbart. She's just a phony opportunist. She's as goofy as Rand Paul.
Yeah but Rand Paul sucks in a bikini.
Jo
If you're voting on looks you might as well be a Republican
Nor does calling the chanpion of the 53rd Superbowl "the 53rd Superbowl champion" split one team into two.Again, there's nothing about a nonconsecutive term that makes a person into two people.
Again,we already covered this. Good luck!
Well then...I just gotta ask...WHY in the HELL did ya'll run HILLARY in 2016??????Because Democrats are about substance...Why? Because Democrats are ugly?If you're voting on looks you might as well be a Republican
You walked into that one.
Don't look now Dems, but you have a "dissenter" in the ranks that MUST be muzzled and chained. And even WORSE -- she MIGHT be a "closet Libertarian"... Even if she is NOT -- she's definitely "standing out" as an INDEPENDENT voice in the party.. And the first actually smart candidate to declare..
Sure -- the Party chiefs are mad about her not wanting to add Assad to the list of mid-east bastard tyrants that we have disposed. Called her an Assad puppet, not because she SUPPORTS him, but because she knows the insanity of removing tyrants in the Mid East.
But the MAJOR reason she needs to be whacked is that she publicly spoke out about Sgt Debbie Whatzhername Schultz and her antics that tipped the DNC support against Uncle Bernie. And Tulsi Gabbart had the honor of RESIGNING from the DNC... A move NO FUTURE party Dem nominee ought to make..
Don't care if this interview was on Fox. Greenwald is the last of REAL journalism in this world. And has my total respect. WATCH the 3.4 minutes for a list of how Gabbart "offended" her own party...
You should at least learn to spell her last name correctly. It's Gabbard - not Gabbart. She's just a phony opportunist. She's as goofy as Rand Paul.
Yeah but Rand Paul sucks in a bikini.
Jo
If you're voting on looks you might as well be a Republican
Camel toe pulls left as well zorba! Scares the shit outta gaybies!
Jo
She's a flag waver!Well then...I just gotta ask...WHY in the HELL did ya'll run HILLARY in 2016??????Because Democrats are about substance...Why? Because Democrats are ugly?If you're voting on looks you might as well be a Republican
You walked into that one.
"she wants Bashar to stay because she's worried about Syria's Christian population. just for saying that, The Daily Beast linked her to David Duke" - Tucker
Well then...I just gotta ask...WHY in the HELL did ya'll run HILLARY in 2016??????Because Democrats are about substance...Why? Because Democrats are ugly?If you're voting on looks you might as well be a Republican
You walked into that one.
That was a political party, not a "y'all".
Political parties are gonna run whoever the fuck they want. Don't you know that?
Don't look now Dems, but you have a "dissenter" in the ranks that MUST be muzzled and chained. And even WORSE -- she MIGHT be a "closet Libertarian"... Even if she is NOT -- she's definitely "standing out" as an INDEPENDENT voice in the party.. And the first actually smart candidate to declare..
Sure -- the Party chiefs are mad about her not wanting to add Assad to the list of mid-east bastard tyrants that we have disposed. Called her an Assad puppet, not because she SUPPORTS him, but because she knows the insanity of removing tyrants in the Mid East.
But the MAJOR reason she needs to be whacked is that she publicly spoke out about Sgt Debbie Whatzhername Schultz and her antics that tipped the DNC support against Uncle Bernie. And Tulsi Gabbart had the honor of RESIGNING from the DNC... A move NO FUTURE party Dem nominee ought to make..
Don't care if this interview was on Fox. Greenwald is the last of REAL journalism in this world. And has my total respect. WATCH the 3.4 minutes for a list of how Gabbart "offended" her own party...
Don't look now Dems, but you have a "dissenter" in the ranks that MUST be muzzled and chained. And even WORSE -- she MIGHT be a "closet Libertarian"... Even if she is NOT -- she's definitely "standing out" as an INDEPENDENT voice in the party.. And the first actually smart candidate to declare..
Sure -- the Party chiefs are mad about her not wanting to add Assad to the list of mid-east bastard tyrants that we have disposed. Called her an Assad puppet, not because she SUPPORTS him, but because she knows the insanity of removing tyrants in the Mid East.
But the MAJOR reason she needs to be whacked is that she publicly spoke out about Sgt Debbie Whatzhername Schultz and her antics that tipped the DNC support against Uncle Bernie. And Tulsi Gabbart had the honor of RESIGNING from the DNC... A move NO FUTURE party Dem nominee ought to make..
Don't care if this interview was on Fox. Greenwald is the last of REAL journalism in this world. And has my total respect. WATCH the 3.4 minutes for a list of how Gabbart "offended" her own party...
They don’t like her because she is not Marxist enough and she doesn’t show enough hatred toward white males.