so, no answer to my question
they changed the rule to benefit Quid Pro Joe; Tulsi, as a real moderate, enhances Bernie's chances if she stays in and gets real exposure
Rule changes cannot be made without the entire DNC approving of it. Thank you for continuing to show your stupidity. The change in the criteria was made because we need a debate between the candidates who have a chance not a fringe candidate.
Why did allow they allow 20 candidates in the first debate? Why wasn’t that already in the rules?
It’s so weird the DNC keeps changing rules.
you are another ignorant dumbass. The criteria was set low because everybody was tied for first place.
Ok, but so many were not viable candidates.
Also, why do they keep having to change the rules? Why wasn’t it already tiered.
You aren’t actually contending it’s NOT a corrupted process are you? You are not that much of an ignorant dumbass, are you?
You are the ignorant dumbass. I thought they were too lenient in the beginning. There was nothing corrupt about it. As the process moves to a different stage, the criteria should change.
When are the Republican debates scheduled for? That is what is rigged.
I posted such a debate back here, but rotsa ruck for any voters getting a chance to even know about it. Republican Party has at least three nationally-prominent people challenging Rump, and Rump has them cancelling primaries so that people can't even vote, let alone know they're running.