Democrats lock Republicans out of committee room!

[Si modo]

Yeah. Telling you I didn't ask for your edit is an attack. LMAO. What a joke you are.

Being dishonest and falsely claiming I edited your post when I did nothing of the sort is an attack.

BTW you still haven't offered anything real. I wonder why (sarcasm)??

So you make a habit out of this do you? You did this to me last month too.

You are a dishonest poster. I ridicule such dishonesty. It's good for vermin control.

It's simple, though. If you don't like getting called out for dishonesty, get honest.

Count on my presence though, if I am aware of it.

I'm pretty sure you will encounter this again.

 

[drsmith1072]

OK...we dropped the ball. Fine. Now you are OK with dropping the ball as well?

you still don't get it. It's not a matter of dropping the ball this is NOTHING that righties are trying oh so desperately to make into something.

The argument WAS that the republicans were locked out and being denied input. However, that turned out to be FALSE. No one is being denied input in this instance. There is no gotcha. The false argument at the core of this thread is nothing but another part of the game.

So the reason for changing the lock was?

And dont give me that "we did not want them to use the room in our absence crap".....seeing as that is quite obvoiously NOT the reason to change the lock....if the republicans want to meet alone, there are plenty of conference rooms, living rooms and offices to meet......

OMG drop the lock bs it has absolutely ZERO relevance.

So since you obviously know why they locked the room why are you asking me?? Care to explain?

Oh and the fact is that it still had nothing to do with denying the republicans a chance to provide input.

 

[mdn2000]

Obama the liar, obama said the talks would be broadcast on cspan

obama is a liar

 

[drsmith1072]

Yeah. Telling you I didn't ask for your edit is an attack. LMAO. What a joke you are.

Being dishonest and falsely claiming I edited your post when I did nothing of the sort is an attack.

BTW you still haven't offered anything real. I wonder why (sarcasm)??

Morons say that when they paraphrase a person it is not part of editing. That makes you a moron.

But, I already knew that.

And here you are shitting all over another thread. Like a seagull you fly into a thread, shit all over it with your insane nonsense, only you don't fly away like a seagull does after that.

Pity.

You are a useless troll with useless input.

You should really look up the defintiion of the word EDIT.

Me saying "so in other words" and then offering my OPINION as to why I believe you failed to offer anything of substance is not editing your post.

Your post is intact and nothing was edited or removed.

I do think it's funny that since the false argument that started this thread has gone flat you and pilgrim have started attacking me in a lame attempt to change the subject to me personally. LOL

That tells me that you can't debate based on the facts and have to fall back on peronal attacks to try and attack the messenger.

That tells me that you know that you have failed miserably and this is your last resort to try and cya.

 

[saveliberty]

Perhaps the Republicans wanted to hold a meeting to discuss possible solutions, suggestions or input from their perspective? The Democrats kept them out for punitive reasons. The article makes that point clear.

Way too much time being spent obstructing, more time constructing please.

 

[Si modo]

Being dishonest and falsely claiming I edited your post when I did nothing of the sort is an attack.

BTW you still haven't offered anything real. I wonder why (sarcasm)??

Morons say that when they paraphrase a person it is not part of editing. That makes you a moron.

But, I already knew that.

And here you are shitting all over another thread. Like a seagull you fly into a thread, shit all over it with your insane nonsense, only you don't fly away like a seagull does after that.

Pity.

You are a useless troll with useless input.

You should really look up the defintiion of the word EDIT.

Me saying "so in other words" and then offering my OPINION as to why I believe you failed to offer anything of substance is not editing your post.

Your post is intact and nothing was edited or removed.

I do think it's funny that since the false argument that started this thread has gone flat you and pilgrim have started attacking me in a lame attempt to change the subject to me personally. LOL

That tells me that you can't debate based on the facts and have to fall back on peronal attacks to try and attack the messenger.

That tells me that you know that you have failed miserably and this is your last resort to try and cya.

You are a useless and dishonest troll and you soil the threads in which you participate. I give no slack to dishonesty.

 

[Oldandtired]

you still don't get it. It's not a matter of dropping the ball this is NOTHING that righties are trying oh so desperately to make into something.

The argument WAS that the republicans were locked out and being denied input. However, that turned out to be FALSE. No one is being denied input in this instance. There is no gotcha. The false argument at the core of this thread is nothing but another part of the game.

So the reason for changing the lock was?

And dont give me that "we did not want them to use the room in our absence crap".....seeing as that is quite obvoiously NOT the reason to change the lock....if the republicans want to meet alone, there are plenty of conference rooms, living rooms and offices to meet......

OMG drop the lock bs it has absolutely ZERO relevance.

So since you obviously know why they locked the room why are you asking me?? Care to explain?

Oh and the fact is that it still had nothing to do with denying the republicans a chance to provide input.

I have no idea why they changed the lock....but they did. And I would like to know why.
Why do you not care? Obviously therew was a reason..I have my trheories...but I have no idea.

The story is they changed the lock. Say what you want....but there is a future.....so maybe it was not used for any purpose yesterday....but what is the reason they did it? What are their plans?

Or ignore it and play on a side issue about it that has absolutely no relevance.

Youy are a smart man....you pointed out a reason as not why they did it....that takes rocket scinece to figure out...they did not do it to keep reps out YESTERDAY because they themselves were not in there at the time. GREAT JOB sparky....

So tell me why they did it and how will it affect us tomorrow?

I know...too deep for ya...I understand.

 

[Xenophon]

It's a game pure and simple.

No it isn't, and it appears you don't know how to read as I spelled out the exact opposite of your diatribe is the case, but you went ahead and posted the same stupid shit anyway like the good apparchek you are.

People like you are pathetic and are in fact the real reason the nation is so devided, you ignore what people say right to you and still insert your 'feelings' into it.

 

[Oldandtired]

It's a game pure and simple.

No it isn't, and it appears you don't know how to read as I spelled out the exact opposite of your diatribe is the case, but you went ahead and posted the same stupid shit anyway like the good apparchek you are.

People like you are pathetic and are in fact the real reason the nation is so devided, you ignore what people say right to you and still insert your 'feelings' into it.

This is true. I picked up on that exact thing with that poster.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

What a disgrace. Yea he's "Changing the tone in Washington" alright. This administration is becoming increasingly partisan & arrogant. From earlier in the week boasting about "Controlling the Media" to this pathetic bit of partisan hackery. These people are just whiny spoiled children at this point. Lets just hope & pray they lose some power in 2010 and beyond. More & more people are getting pretty tired of this miserable Socialist Malaise.

 

[Xenophon]

Oh dear...OH DEAR!!!!!!!!!!

Bubbleheaded booby.

 

[Zoom-boing]

Why'd they change the lock? Retaliation.

For months Towns has refused Republican requests to subpoena records in the case. Last Thursday Committee Republicans, led by Issa, were poised to force an open vote on the subpoenas at a Committee mark-up meeting. The mark-up was abruptly canceled. Only Republicans showed up while Democrats chairs remained empty.

Republicans charged that Towns canceled the meeting to avoid the subpoena vote. Democrats first claimed the mark-up was canceled due to a conflict with the Financial Services Committee. Later they said it was abandoned after a disagreement among Democratic members on whether to subpoena records on the mortgage industry’s political contributions to Republicans.

A GOP committee staffer captured video of Democrats leaving their separate meeting in private chambers after the mark-up was supposed to have begun. He spliced the video to other footage of the Democrats’ empty chairs at the hearing room, set it to the tune of “Hit the Road, Jack” and posted it on the Oversight and Government Reform Committee’s minority webpage, where it remained as of press time.

Towns’s staffers told Republicans they were not happy about the presence of the video camera in the hearing room when they were not present. Issa’s spokesman said the Democrats readily acknowledged to Republicans that they changed the locks in retaliation to the videotape of the Democrats’ absence from the business meeting even though committee rules allow meetings to be taped.

"It's not surprising that they would choose to retaliate given the embarrassment we caused by catching them in a lie on tape,” said Issa spokesman Kurt Bardella. “If only they would use their creative energy to do some actual oversight rather than resorting to immature tactics, but I guess we're getting some insight into what lengths they'll go to avoid addressing the Countrywide VIP issue."

Towns’s office said in a statement the locks were changed on Republicans "because they don't know how to behave." As for the video the GOP made, Towns's office pointed out: "The minority is using taxpayer dollars to make these campaign style videos."

Bardella replied: "It's also those same taxpayer dollars that paid for them to sit in a room while they came up with an excuse to cancel the mark-up -- what exactly do they do all day?"

And if you read the entire article yes, the Republicans were doing similar shit to the Dems back a few years. We know. Doesn't matter which side, it's wrong and we get screwed in the end.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

Could you imagine the Liberal Media outrage if these were Republicans locking Democrats out? My God,ole Wolfy boy Blitzer over at CNN,the NY Slimes,NBC,ABC,CBS,and a whole slew of other Liberal Media hacks would be breaking their legs jumping up on their high horses screeching about how awful this is. So far not a peep out of these media outlets huh? Hopey Changey has "Changed the tone of Washington." He's made it much much worse. This administration really is becoming increasingly arrogant and partisan.

 

[LibocalypseNow]

"Absolute Power corrupts absolutely." This administration is becoming incredibly arrogant and partisan. "We control the Media?" Yikes!

 

[drsmith1072]

Morons say that when they paraphrase a person it is not part of editing. That makes you a moron.

But, I already knew that.

And here you are shitting all over another thread. Like a seagull you fly into a thread, shit all over it with your insane nonsense, only you don't fly away like a seagull does after that.

Pity.

You are a useless troll with useless input.

You should really look up the defintiion of the word EDIT.

Me saying "so in other words" and then offering my OPINION as to why I believe you failed to offer anything of substance is not editing your post.

Your post is intact and nothing was edited or removed.

I do think it's funny that since the false argument that started this thread has gone flat you and pilgrim have started attacking me in a lame attempt to change the subject to me personally. LOL

That tells me that you can't debate based on the facts and have to fall back on peronal attacks to try and attack the messenger.

That tells me that you know that you have failed miserably and this is your last resort to try and cya.

You are a useless and dishonest troll and you soil the threads in which you participate. I give no slack to dishonesty.

LOL and even now you can offer NOTHING of substance.

The funniest thing of all is that you attack me and call me dishoenst and yet I am the one trying to talk about the FACTS and you are attacking me because the FACTS run counter to your beliefs.

 

[Oldandtired]

You should really look up the defintiion of the word EDIT.

Me saying "so in other words" and then offering my OPINION as to why I believe you failed to offer anything of substance is not editing your post.

Your post is intact and nothing was edited or removed.

I do think it's funny that since the false argument that started this thread has gone flat you and pilgrim have started attacking me in a lame attempt to change the subject to me personally. LOL

That tells me that you can't debate based on the facts and have to fall back on peronal attacks to try and attack the messenger.

That tells me that you know that you have failed miserably and this is your last resort to try and cya.

You are a useless and dishonest troll and you soil the threads in which you participate. I give no slack to dishonesty.

LOL and even now you can offer NOTHING of substance.

The funniest thing of all is that you attack me and call me dishoenst and yet I am the one trying to talk about the FACTS and you are attacking me because the FACTS run counter to your beliefs.

Now now....why must you lie?

You dont want to discuss the facts....you want to be right...and when the facts dont back you up, you start to attack the messanger of the facts.

Now....go get a job. You will be amazed at how nice it is to get things on your own.

 

[SFC Ollie]

Just another incident that makes one wonder where the hell the transparency went to. I know it was promised, I remember hearing it.

 

[Oldandtired]

Just another incident that makes one wonder where the hell the transparency went to. I know it was promised, I remember hearing it.

<S>...thanks for your service my friend.

Al

 

[drsmith1072]

So the reason for changing the lock was?

And dont give me that "we did not want them to use the room in our absence crap".....seeing as that is quite obvoiously NOT the reason to change the lock....if the republicans want to meet alone, there are plenty of conference rooms, living rooms and offices to meet......

OMG drop the lock bs it has absolutely ZERO relevance.

So since you obviously know why they locked the room why are you asking me?? Care to explain?

Oh and the fact is that it still had nothing to do with denying the republicans a chance to provide input.

I have no idea why they changed the lock....but they did. And I would like to know why.
Why do you not care? Obviously therew was a reason..I have my trheories...but I have no idea.

The story is they changed the lock. Say what you want....but there is a future.....so maybe it was not used for any purpose yesterday....but what is the reason they did it? What are their plans?

Or ignore it and play on a side issue about it that has absolutely no relevance.

Youy are a smart man....you pointed out a reason as not why they did it....that takes rocket scinece to figure out...they did not do it to keep reps out YESTERDAY because they themselves were not in there at the time. GREAT JOB sparky....

So tell me why they did it and how will it affect us tomorrow?

I know...too deep for ya...I understand.

Imagine that, more personal attacks and still nothing REAL.

You asked me why they changed the locks and i gave you the reason listed. You proclaim that is not the reason so i ask you what is the real reason and you admit that you don't know. Then you come back ask ME again why they changed the locks. LOL

BTW the story is that they locked them out of the room when dems are not there the fact that they changed the locks is only a minor detail and not really relevant to the whole.

Of course in the scheme of this thread and claims made by righties it also does nothing to correct the false claim that locking them out when dems are not in there in NO way shape or form denied them a chance to provide input.

 

[Oldandtired]

OMG drop the lock bs it has absolutely ZERO relevance.

So since you obviously know why they locked the room why are you asking me?? Care to explain?

Oh and the fact is that it still had nothing to do with denying the republicans a chance to provide input.

I have no idea why they changed the lock....but they did. And I would like to know why.
Why do you not care? Obviously therew was a reason..I have my trheories...but I have no idea.

The story is they changed the lock. Say what you want....but there is a future.....so maybe it was not used for any purpose yesterday....but what is the reason they did it? What are their plans?

Or ignore it and play on a side issue about it that has absolutely no relevance.

Youy are a smart man....you pointed out a reason as not why they did it....that takes rocket scinece to figure out...they did not do it to keep reps out YESTERDAY because they themselves were not in there at the time. GREAT JOB sparky....

So tell me why they did it and how will it affect us tomorrow?

I know...too deep for ya...I understand.

Imagine that, more personal attacks and still nothing REAL.

You asked me why they changed the locks and i gave you the reason listed. You proclaim that is not the reason so i ask you what is the real reason and you admit that you don't know. Then you come back ask ME again why they changed the locks. LOL

BTW the story is that they locked them out of the room when dems are not there the fact that they changed the locks is only a minor detail and not really relevant to the whole.

Of course in the scheme of this thread and claims made by righties it also does nothing to correct the false claim that locking them out when dems are not in there in NO way shape or form denied them a chance to provide input.

You are such a poor deflector

Thiuer excuse for changing the lock was so republicans can not meet while they dems are not there.

But repubs dont need to meet in that room to meet....so to the normal minded person, that excuse is a farce.

So why are they lying about why they changed the lock?

But why should you care? You seemed to care about every move any conservative, republican, business owner, bank, etc, made...but you dont care about an obvious lie offered by the majority of our government.

I wonder why that is.