Lock Her Up

[Rigby5]

Why would the justice department take action against Hutchinson?

Edit: Never mind. I see now you posted the reason as being disloyal to Trump.

Are you familiar with the term "brown shirt"?

Because she lied and said something happened which did not happen.
And it is no excuse to claim someone else said it when they did not, and when 2nd hand hearsay is illegal.

 

[Rigby5]

Thanks for that... Loyalty or jail... No crime.....

This is what they represent now...

I presume you would like your own police force to capture these disloyal people... And sure you would need your own Judges to try them...

Can we see where this is going?

Wrong.
She lied.
That is a crime.

 

[lennypartiv]

Because she lied and said something happened which did not happen.

But nothing will happen to her. Look at all the crap that Hillary did, and she was never locked up.

 

[Rigby5]

The two ladies should get the Medal of Freedom.

Wrong.
Congress is at fault for not improving the election process, that we knew people did not trust, going way back to 2000.

 

[Rigby5]

But nothing will happen to her. Look at all the crap that Hillary did, and she was never locked up.

Hillary was protected by the classified status of things like sending Ambassador Stevens into Benghazi to illegally arm ISIS against Assad.

She also wiped her email server so there was no evidence of the classified emails.

Hillary is smart, just not ethical.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Because she lied and said something happened which did not happen.

How do you know she lied?

And it is no excuse to claim someone else said it when they did not, and when 2nd hand hearsay is illegal.

2nd hand heresay is not illegal. It wasn't a court of law and they claimed during the hearing this was what she she heard, not what she see saw.

Perhaps the person who testified against their is guilty of purjery? Is that possible?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Rigby, you have no proof of any of that. Allegations, yes, but no proof.

 

[White 6]

It is criminal to make false public accusations.
It is improper to pass on 2nd hand rumors in sworn testimony.
Lawyers and judge would have stopped it in a court, so Congress totally screwed up, deliberately.

Godd luck with it.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

So, you're only hope for an orange bag O' shit administration is the implied 'get out of jail free' card. You're a real scumbag.

There will be no jail simpleton.

 

[lennypartiv]

There will be no jail simpleton.

Let them dream. Their lives suck, at least let them have a few fantasies.

 

[john doe 101]

Do we still need proof? You libs are trying to put Trump behind bars even though you have zero proof he did anything wrong.

You are just refusing to see the proof regarding trump, you filthy Red Hat.

 

[sealybobo]

Won't happen.

Yea but isn't it funny YET AGAIN Trump is choking on his own words? Lock her up? And today, first time ever, a former president is being charged with a felony. And it's only 1 of 4 trials. The next 3 are much more serious.

Compared to Hillary using her private emails? Holy shit. Compared to everything Trump's being accused of?

Lock her up isn't the only thing I'm throwing in Trump's face. Remember he warned what might happen if Hillary were president? Remember Trump warned us of this day in 2017?

As recently as last year, Republicans said there'd be a "crisis" if a sitting president face a federal investigation. Little did they know at the time...

In June 2016, after the Democratic presidential primaries, Barack Obama officially threw his support behind Hillary Clinton. Donald Trump, borrowing a page from Fox News, pushed a very specific line: "Never before," the Republican tweeted, "has a president endorsed someone under investigation" by the Justice Department.

 

[sealybobo]

Trump predicted that Clinton's election would bring "an unprecedented and protracted constitutional crisis" because of the looming investigation and suggested Americans would not want to endure a second Clinton administration marred by scandal.

Three days later, Trump insisted that Clinton, as president, couldn't possibly be expected to govern -- because the investigation into her email server protocols would make such an endeavor impossible.

 

[lennypartiv]

You are just refusing to see the proof regarding trump, you filthy Red Hat.

They've started seating the jurors who will acquit Trump.

 

[busybee01]

A trial instigated by Biden? Sum Ting Wong.

You are a lying weasel.

 

[john doe 101]

They've started seating the jurors who will acquit Trump.

So now it's a fair trial?

 

[lennypartiv]

So now it's a fair trial?

It will be if he's acquitted.

 

[MagicMike]

Isn't Biden locking up his political opponent?

Nope
Fake news