Democratic Party is very smart

[Concerned American]

/---/ To be clear, I mean the guy pushing the mower, not the guy who owns the landscaping business.

The former many times becomes the latter.

 

[The Original Tree]

You are out of your mind... change the channel for God's sake...

Why won't you denounce Joe's hair sniffing ways? Shouldn't you be upset that Hunter calls his father Pedo Peter? And why did Joe take showers with his teenage daughter? Why do you find it so hard to criticize that? Do you approve of Pedo Peter The Hair Sniffing Child Eater?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yup. And thank God it’s not Trump steering this ship. He would run out of people to blame for the COVID aftermath

Soooo.....you are jubilant about having stolen the election?

And the awful result by your party.....means nothing?

 

[PoliticalChic]

I’m only proving that in your warped little mind Mikey. I couldn’t be further from a commie

'....but couldn't be closer to 'fool'....'


BTW.....how many times now have I exposed you as a liar?????

 

[PoliticalChic]

I’m not going to waste my time reading the stupid list but I’ll address the first few.
1. Nothing wrong with asking for a link as people like you make false statements all the time. This conversation is Case in point

2 and 3. Not things that I do. Prove me wrong and show when I’ve ever rejected facts. You can’t

"I’m not going to waste my time reading the stupid list but I’ll address the first few."


What an imbecile......contradicting himself in one sentence.

 

[Slade3200]

Soooo.....you are jubilant about having stolen the election?

And the awful result by your party.....means nothing?

Haha, no. Only a complete moron would think the presidential election was stolen. Don’t be so gullible. Think for yourself

 

[Slade3200]

'....but couldn't be closer to 'fool'....'


BTW.....how many times now have I exposed you as a liar?????

You haven’t exposed me as a liar once. Only in your warped little mind.

 

[Slade3200]

"I’m not going to waste my time reading the stupid list but I’ll address the first few."


What an imbecile......contradicting himself in one sentence.

How so?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Haha, no. Only a complete moron would think the presidential election was stolen. Don’t be so gullible. Think for yourself

A question, the correct answer to which, will prove that no such election result occurred.


Answer the question.


Think carefully before you answer, because I know the right answer.



There were a number of changes up to and into the 2020 election, including but not limited to....

Drop boxes



Ballot harvesting



Alter times methods of voting



How long after dates can votes be counted



Signing of absentee ballots.



Who has the lawful right to alter the “time, place, and manner” of national elections.....you know.....like the 2020 presidential election?







Is it state governors,



election officials,



attorneys general,



state courts,



state constitutions,



sec’ys of state,



election commission......





Or.....some other body?????

 

[PoliticalChic]

You haven’t exposed me as a liar once. Only in your warped little mind.

Let's check.

Didn’t you deny that the Constitution takes precedence over state courts???

If There Was No Fraud, Why? posts 260-270

 

[Slade3200]

A question, the correct answer to which, will prove that no such election result occurred.


Answer the question.


Think carefully before you answer, because I know the right answer.



There were a number of changes up to and into the 2020 election, including but not limited to....

Drop boxes



Ballot harvesting



Alter times methods of voting



How long after dates can votes be counted



Signing of absentee ballots.



Who has the lawful right to alter the “time, place, and manner” of national elections.....you know.....like the 2020 presidential election?







Is it state governors,



election officials,



attorneys general,



state courts,



state constitutions,



sec’ys of state,



election commission......





Or.....some other body?????

Each states legislature decides their voting protocol but Congress may also make or alter regulations.

 

[Slade3200]

Let's check.

Didn’t you deny that the Constitution takes precedence over state courts???

If There Was No Fraud, Why? posts 260-270

Nope. The constitution is the law of the land. The courts are there to adjudicate legal disputes

 

[PoliticalChic]

Each states legislature decides their voting protocol but Congress may also make or alter regulations.

You're lying again.

You can't stop lying, huh?

I can provide it.



The Constitution is known as ‘the law of the land.’

The U.S. Constitution calls itself the "supreme law of the land." This clause is taken to mean that when state constitutions or laws passed by state legislatures or the national Congress are found to conflict with the federal Constitution, they have no force.

The Constitution as Supreme Law

http://www.let.rug.nl › usa › outlines › government-1991




The fact is that the only document that Americans have agreed to be governed by is the Constitution. It is written in English….no ‘interpretation’ is required.



Wherein we find this:
Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.
Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”

​

McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)

supreme.justia.com



But....this occurred: courts altered voting rules.
“In Pennsylvania, the question was whether the state’s Supreme Court could override voting rules set by the state legislature. In North Carolina, the question was whether state election officials had the power to alter such voting rules.”
NYTimes

Sooo.....no, the election was not correctly decided, and we don't actually know who won the election.





Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.

Supremacy Clause | Wex | US Law

 

[PoliticalChic]

Each states legislature decides their voting protocol but Congress may also make or alter regulations.

So any state where

state governors,



election officials,



attorneys general,



state courts,



state constitutions,



sec’ys of state,



election commission......

altered the “time, place, and manner” of national elections.....you know.....like the 2020 presidential election....



.....that would be illegal?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Nope. The constitution is the law of the land. The courts are there to adjudicate legal disputes

That's a lie.

You can't stop, huh?


Years of practice????

 

[The Original Tree]

Haha, no. Only a complete moron would think the presidential election was stolen. Don’t be so gullible. Think for yourself

The only way a Pedophile like Pedo Peter The Hair Sniffing Child Eater would get into office is through a stolen election.

The Diaper Shitting Corrupt Senile Putin Xi Puppet did not even campaign, no one showed up for his speeches when he did campaign, and he ran like a coward from one debate and was hidden from Public View nearly his entire campaign.

You had to use COVID19, Illegal Changes to Election Laws, and Maduro Voting Machines to Usurp Democracy and put this Piece of Shit Mental Midget in The White House Forever Defiling and Desecrating that Temple To Democracy.

F You, your Friends and everyone you know.

May you and those like you burn in Hell Forever for your Treason, Insurrection, Sedition, Treachery and Election Fraud and your incessant 24-7 Propaganda and Lies.

Do you still support Pedo Peter The Hair Sniffing Child Eater now that his Son calls "The Big Guy" a Pedophile?

 

[Slade3200]

You're lying again.

You can't stop lying, huh?

I can provide it.



The Constitution is known as ‘the law of the land.’

The U.S. Constitution calls itself the "supreme law of the land." This clause is taken to mean that when state constitutions or laws passed by state legislatures or the national Congress are found to conflict with the federal Constitution, they have no force.

The Constitution as Supreme Law

http://www.let.rug.nl › usa › outlines › government-1991




The fact is that the only document that Americans have agreed to be governed by is the Constitution. It is written in English….no ‘interpretation’ is required.



Wherein we find this:
Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.
Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”

​

McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)

supreme.justia.com



But....this occurred: courts altered voting rules.
“In Pennsylvania, the question was whether the state’s Supreme Court could override voting rules set by the state legislature. In North Carolina, the question was whether state election officials had the power to alter such voting rules.”
NYTimes

Sooo.....no, the election was not correctly decided, and we don't actually know who won the election.





Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.

Supremacy Clause | Wex | US Law

You really need to learn how to properly use the term “lie”. You sound like a Leftist using “racist”. Get real. You may think I’m wrong, but being wrong does not translate to lying.

My answer is based on the powers dictated by the constitution in Article I, Section 4, Clause 1:

The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.

 

[Slade3200]

That's a lie.

You can't stop, huh?


Years of practice????

What’s a lie?

 

[PoliticalChic]

You really need to learn how to properly use the term “lie”. You sound like a Leftist using “racist”. Get real. You may think I’m wrong, but being wrong does not translate to lying.

My answer is based on the powers ducted by the constitution in

Article I, Section 4, Clause 1:

The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.

Is there any body in a state, other than the state legislature that can alter the “time, place, and manner” of elections.


That's a yes or no.....

But....this occurred: courts altered voting rules.
“In Pennsylvania, the question was whether the state’s Supreme Court could override voting rules set by the state legislature. In North Carolina, the question was whether state election officials had the power to alter such voting rules.”
NYTimes


Is that legitimate, lawful, constitutional????


Yes or no?

 

[PoliticalChic]

What’s a lie?

It's evident to all that you have been proven to be lying scum.


Why deny it?