California Dreamin' bout LGBTQ

I am dead set against anyone or any law trampling on anybody's rights but I do long for the good ol' days when homosexuality was a felony. It may be legal now by law but it's still an abominable sin.

So......you want the government to be telling consenting Americans how they can have private consensual sex.

Yes- you are so 'dead set against' laws trampling on people's rights.....


The guy is just like the islamis he attacks. He wants to control peoples lives and even kill them if they dare step out of his beliefs.

He is a religious fascist.
Absolutely not. I don't care what other people do. In the end God will handle it.

Which is why you prefer laws which let the Government tell Americans how they can have sex.....
I don't prefer any such laws. There are no such laws. Except Leviticus 20:13 (NKJ).

If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them. (NKJ, Leviticus 20:13)
 
What about all the straight students that wish to engage in Intramural sports and Academic competition with those states. Is that not discrimination against those who do not wish to participate in the LGBTQxyz lifestyle?.
The law bans state-funded or state-sponsored travel by employees of state agencies and departments as well as members of boards, authorities, and commissions.

Students at State Universities are not employees, or members of boards, authorities or commissions.

. Don't need more fascists showing up anyways....

And Brown is a fascist because he signed a bill passed by the elected representatives, that restricts the State paying for employee travel?

By that standard, Trump is a fascist if he signs off on the new healthcare bill, which would refuse tax credits for insurance to Americans who buy an insurance plan that includes provisions for abortion.

Of course by that standard, Trump is more of a fascist since he just tightened the restrictions on travel by Americans to Cuba......(real restrictions not just refusing to pay for their travel)

you make your little Trump comparisons. If it pleases you. EVEN IF --- they make no sense like your last diversion. If it helps you ignore the massive egotistical bad idea of BARRING travel within "the free-est country" on the planet.

You will never hold Trump or the United States to the arbitrary standard you seem to want to hold Brown and California.

And how could you?

Your position is pure hypocrisy.
This is why religion sucks as it is nothing but a myth that drives people to mistreat other people.

Oh give that up, you sound like a redundant parrot, religion sucks, infrastructure!!!!

You idiots preach tolerance but if you don't get your way are some of the most intolerant jackwads on the planet
AHMEN!!!!
 
I am dead set against anyone or any law trampling on anybody's rights but I do long for the good ol' days when homosexuality was a felony. It may be legal now by law but it's still an abominable sin.

So......you want the government to be telling consenting Americans how they can have private consensual sex.

Yes- you are so 'dead set against' laws trampling on people's rights.....

People don't have the right to be a fag. And that's a fact. Seriously, Syriusly.

So you think that Big Brother should be telling Americans exactly whom they are allowed to have consensual sex?

Seriously?

Where did I say or imply that?

Hoss:
I am dead set against anyone or any law trampling on anybody's rights but I do long for the good ol' days when homosexuality was a felony.

Not applicable to your statement.
 
I am dead set against anyone or any law trampling on anybody's rights but I do long for the good ol' days when homosexuality was a felony. It may be legal now by law but it's still an abominable sin.

So......you want the government to be telling consenting Americans how they can have private consensual sex.

Yes- you are so 'dead set against' laws trampling on people's rights.....


The guy is just like the islamis he attacks. He wants to control peoples lives and even kill them if they dare step out of his beliefs.

He is a religious fascist.
Absolutely not. I don't care what other people do. In the end God will handle it.

Which is why you prefer laws which let the Government tell Americans how they can have sex.....
I don't prefer any such laws. There are no such laws. Except Leviticus 20:13 (NKJ).

If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them. (NKJ, Leviticus 20:13)

The laws are still on the book- you expressed regret that they are no longer enforceable.

And yeah- Leviticus has all sorts of wonderful laws.......you follow all of Leviticus's laws?

Think adulterers should be put to death?
Think it should be illegal to have sex with a woman when she is having her period?
What about eating pork?
Leviticus 11:7
And the swine, though he divide the hoof, and be clovenfooted, yet he cheweth not the cud; he is unclean to you.
Of their flesh shall ye not eat, and their carcase shall ye not touch; they are unclean to you.
 
So......you want the government to be telling consenting Americans how they can have private consensual sex.

Yes- you are so 'dead set against' laws trampling on people's rights.....

People don't have the right to be a fag. And that's a fact. Seriously, Syriusly.

So you think that Big Brother should be telling Americans exactly whom they are allowed to have consensual sex?

Seriously?

Where did I say or imply that?

Hoss:
I am dead set against anyone or any law trampling on anybody's rights but I do long for the good ol' days when homosexuality was a felony.

Not applicable to your statement.

Hoss:
I am dead set against anyone or any law trampling on anybody's rights but I do long for the good ol' days when homosexuality was a felony.

felony: Big Brother telling Americans what they can or cannot do.

You miss the good old days when Big Brother told Americans what kind of consensual private sex that they could have.
 
I am dead set against anyone or any law trampling on anybody's rights but I do long for the good ol' days when homosexuality was a felony. It may be legal now by law but it's still an abominable sin.

So......you want the government to be telling consenting Americans how they can have private consensual sex.

Yes- you are so 'dead set against' laws trampling on people's rights.....


The guy is just like the islamis he attacks. He wants to control peoples lives and even kill them if they dare step out of his beliefs.

He is a religious fascist.
Absolutely not. I don't care what other people do. In the end God will handle it.

Which is why you prefer laws which let the Government tell Americans how they can have sex.....
I don't prefer any such laws. There are no such laws. Except Leviticus 20:13 (NKJ).

If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them. (NKJ, Leviticus 20:13)

Leviticus 24:16
And he that blasphemeth the name of the LORD, he shall surely be put to death,
 
People don't have the right to be a fag. And that's a fact. Seriously, Syriusly.

So you think that Big Brother should be telling Americans exactly whom they are allowed to have consensual sex?

Seriously?

Where did I say or imply that?

Hoss:
I am dead set against anyone or any law trampling on anybody's rights but I do long for the good ol' days when homosexuality was a felony.

Not applicable to your statement.

Hoss:
I am dead set against anyone or any law trampling on anybody's rights but I do long for the good ol' days when homosexuality was a felony.

felony: Big Brother telling Americans what they can or cannot do.

You miss the good old days when Big Brother told Americans what kind of consensual private sex that they could have.


NO ONE WILL TELL ME WHAT TO DO IN MY HOME! I'll die defending my rights.
 
So......you want the government to be telling consenting Americans how they can have private consensual sex.

Yes- you are so 'dead set against' laws trampling on people's rights.....


The guy is just like the islamis he attacks. He wants to control peoples lives and even kill them if they dare step out of his beliefs.

He is a religious fascist.
Absolutely not. I don't care what other people do. In the end God will handle it.

Which is why you prefer laws which let the Government tell Americans how they can have sex.....
I don't prefer any such laws. There are no such laws. Except Leviticus 20:13 (NKJ).

If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them. (NKJ, Leviticus 20:13)

Leviticus 24:16
And he that blasphemeth the name of the LORD, he shall surely be put to death,


There's no difference between islam and Christianity in this area. How can they bitch about islamic law when they're one in the same?
 
So......you want the government to be telling consenting Americans how they can have private consensual sex.

Yes- you are so 'dead set against' laws trampling on people's rights.....


The guy is just like the islamis he attacks. He wants to control peoples lives and even kill them if they dare step out of his beliefs.

He is a religious fascist.
Absolutely not. I don't care what other people do. In the end God will handle it.

Which is why you prefer laws which let the Government tell Americans how they can have sex.....
I don't prefer any such laws. There are no such laws. Except Leviticus 20:13 (NKJ).

If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them. (NKJ, Leviticus 20:13)

The laws are still on the book- you expressed regret that they are no longer enforceable.

And yeah- Leviticus has all sorts of wonderful laws.......you follow all of Leviticus's laws?

Think adulterers should be put to death?
Think it should be illegal to have sex with a woman when she is having her period?
What about eating pork?
Leviticus 11:7
And the swine, though he divide the hoof, and be clovenfooted, yet he cheweth not the cud; he is unclean to you.
Of their flesh shall ye not eat, and their carcase shall ye not touch; they are unclean to you.

Another loon who doesn't understand Covenants and Mosaic Law. All you listed were done away with by the New Covenant....except homosexuality which is still an abomination....try Romans for confirmation
 
Sic semper Tyrannis to the the fascist government that you bastards want!
51Qh8wBoTTL.jpg
 
The guy is just like the islamis he attacks. He wants to control peoples lives and even kill them if they dare step out of his beliefs.

He is a religious fascist.
Absolutely not. I don't care what other people do. In the end God will handle it.

Which is why you prefer laws which let the Government tell Americans how they can have sex.....
I don't prefer any such laws. There are no such laws. Except Leviticus 20:13 (NKJ).

If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them. (NKJ, Leviticus 20:13)

Leviticus 24:16
And he that blasphemeth the name of the LORD, he shall surely be put to death,


There's no difference between islam and Christianity in this area. How can they bitch about islamic law when they're one in the same?

Christians are killing gays?
 
So......you want the government to be telling consenting Americans how they can have private consensual sex.

Yes- you are so 'dead set against' laws trampling on people's rights.....


The guy is just like the islamis he attacks. He wants to control peoples lives and even kill them if they dare step out of his beliefs.

He is a religious fascist.
Absolutely not. I don't care what other people do. In the end God will handle it.

Which is why you prefer laws which let the Government tell Americans how they can have sex.....
I don't prefer any such laws. There are no such laws. Except Leviticus 20:13 (NKJ).

If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them. (NKJ, Leviticus 20:13)

The laws are still on the book- you expressed regret that they are no longer enforceable.

And yeah- Leviticus has all sorts of wonderful laws.......you follow all of Leviticus's laws?

Think adulterers should be put to death?
Think it should be illegal to have sex with a woman when she is having her period?
What about eating pork?
Leviticus 11:7
And the swine, though he divide the hoof, and be clovenfooted, yet he cheweth not the cud; he is unclean to you.
Of their flesh shall ye not eat, and their carcase shall ye not touch; they are unclean to you.
I follow the Commandments
 
So you think that Big Brother should be telling Americans exactly whom they are allowed to have consensual sex?

Seriously?

Where did I say or imply that?

Hoss:
I am dead set against anyone or any law trampling on anybody's rights but I do long for the good ol' days when homosexuality was a felony.

Not applicable to your statement.

Hoss:
I am dead set against anyone or any law trampling on anybody's rights but I do long for the good ol' days when homosexuality was a felony.

felony: Big Brother telling Americans what they can or cannot do.

You miss the good old days when Big Brother told Americans what kind of consensual private sex that they could have.


NO ONE WILL TELL ME WHAT TO DO IN MY HOME! I'll die defending my rights.

What rights? Make a list. No one wants to deny your rights.
 
Where did I say or imply that?

Hoss:
I am dead set against anyone or any law trampling on anybody's rights but I do long for the good ol' days when homosexuality was a felony.

Not applicable to your statement.

Hoss:
I am dead set against anyone or any law trampling on anybody's rights but I do long for the good ol' days when homosexuality was a felony.

felony: Big Brother telling Americans what they can or cannot do.

You miss the good old days when Big Brother told Americans what kind of consensual private sex that they could have.


NO ONE WILL TELL ME WHAT TO DO IN MY HOME! I'll die defending my rights.

What rights? Make a list. No one wants to deny your rights.

Looks as if some of our left wing friends are wearing two faces when it comes to travel bans.
 
So you think that Big Brother should be telling Americans exactly whom they are allowed to have consensual sex?

Seriously?

Where did I say or imply that?

Hoss:
I am dead set against anyone or any law trampling on anybody's rights but I do long for the good ol' days when homosexuality was a felony.

Not applicable to your statement.

Hoss:
I am dead set against anyone or any law trampling on anybody's rights but I do long for the good ol' days when homosexuality was a felony.

felony: Big Brother telling Americans what they can or cannot do.

You miss the good old days when Big Brother told Americans what kind of consensual private sex that they could have.


NO ONE WILL TELL ME WHAT TO DO IN MY HOME! I'll die defending my rights.
I will also defend you if you keep it in your home. But if you Parade your Gay rights, grabbing your boyfriend by the balls in front of young children, demand a Baker or Photographer participate in your faux ceremony, demand all the TAX breaks designed for families,
and demand a % as students or Employee. Then I have to fight you. Misfits must adapt to the society they live in, not demand the Society change to accept their eccentricity!
 
What this is all about folks, is California trying to tell other states they must allow LBGTQ to adopt children! To me California is advocating child abuse. I am sure NAMBLA has many applications pending for little boys of course. Lesbians prefer girl's.
When I lived in CA, a Liberal friend wanted to adopt a child. He and his wife were told there weren't enough white kids available. They offered to adopt a Black kid, as there were more available than applicants! They were told they could not raise a Black kid to embrace his ethnicity.
They went to China and have a beautiful daughter who embraces being a Chinese American.

My paradox is: If white people cannot raise a Black child to be Black, how the hell can GAY people raise a child to be straight? Or are they just trying to increase the Gay population in the only way they can?
 
We expected something different from the People's Democratic Socialist Republic of Kalipornia - the Land of Fruits and Nuts?

Freaks...
 
California offers sanctuary to people who want to Murder LBTQxyz in the name of their Muslim faith, but bans travel to states that don't want to give LBTQ, children to play with. CA says Travel Bans are Unconstitutional, but enforces a travel ban to 8 fellow states because of Laws applied to their residents. So CA thinks it is OK to tell other states how to treat their citizens, but the President shouldn't tell California how to treat foreigners. WTF.

Are you really this much of an idiot? I guess you are.

California has not 'banned' travel to these states- as Trump proposed banning the immigration from certain countries.

California has banned paying State funds for employees to go to these states. If Trump had banned the Federal Government from paying to arrange the airfares from refugees from Syria, then that would be similar.

As a Californian- if I want to travel to any of those states I am free to do so. No ban at all.
I think we all knew that, EINSTEIN.
 

Forum List

Back
Top