Bernie Sanders 2016?! "bang Bang Into The Room" Clinton Has A Challenger.

I wonder if th
Bernie might be, ironically, too honest for the job. More's the pity.
You clearly didn't read the post and/or watch the video. Your signature is also, "The Bill of Rights was not written to apply to Muslims."

Also, I directly asked for people that had nothing more educated to say than "That's stupid" to avoid this topic. You are not welcome here.

Bizarre post dood.

Bernie was my Congressman when I lived in Vermont; I know him well. That's why I say he's too honest for the job. The machine that is the Demoplican Party, the one that writes the script for presidential debates so that nobody else gets in, will see to it that he doesn't get anywhere. He knows their game, they know he knows their game, and you'll see Koch money flowing to Democrat rivals if that's what it takes to stop him.

My sigline is mocking the poster it came from, which you can plainly see if you bother to read it.

And third, this site belongs to USMB, not you, and you have no grounds to exclude anybody, so shove it up your bunghole. Your failure of reading comprehension ain't my problem, Jack.

:fu:

Clearly, my verbal demands aren't enforced here. But when you show up with a short thread that has little to do with the topic even when the OP asked for only opinionated threads, the fault is yours. You can clown all you want. You fit right in.

What the fuck did you think that post was about? Is English your fourth fucking language? You don't even know what the word "thread" means either?

Again, your failure to read is your problem, not mine. I know a fuck of a lot more about the topic than you, so ... yeah you should be embarrassed. Dumbass.

So it's clear to you now, but wasn't in your second post?

People like you that are so focused on insults and hate are called "TROLLS". You can't get respect in real life so you go to forums in hopes vent your hate you are too soft to vent in real life. You look for typo's, gafs, grammar errors etc and "TROLL HARD"

You had some insight, once. Try to stick with information instead of troll habbits, you might get some respect.


Oh go fuck yourself, shitstain. YOU attacked ME here and all I did was offer a comment on the topic. And this after purporting to take the high road in your OP ---- so that you can do the attacking? BULLSHIT. You're trolling your own thread, moron.

Learn to fucking read and maybe you won't find yourself digging that hole. :ahole-1:


Posts don't live without flare :)
 
Perhaps you should first apologize for being an illiterate asshole.

You're actually going to sit on your ass and not acknowledge that?
Are you dishonest as well then?
 
It's, "Bernie might be too honest for the job, ironically".

Not the William Shatner; "Bernie, irionically, might be, too honest, for the job.." <-- Hell that sentence read better than yours.
 
It's, "Bernie might be too honest for the job, ironically".

Not the William Shatner; "Bernie, irionically, might be, too honest, for the job.." <-- Hell that sentence read better than yours.

:uhh:
--- so now you're going to rewrite the syntax in my posts too??

What in the wide world of fuck is your problem, dood? Control freak issue?

Do you sit on the internets all day and create threads so you can attack people? Is that your occupation?
 
Perhaps you should first apologize for being an illiterate asshole.

You're actually going to sit on your ass and not acknowledge that?
Are you dishonest as well then?

So you want honesty?

Make a factual thread in ANY political forum, it will die fast. Make a drama thread the splits the people and it will live a long time. The only hope is to make a Factual Thread and create drama with someone to keep it alive :) So shut up kiddo. :)
 
Perhaps you should first apologize for being an illiterate asshole.

You're actually going to sit on your ass and not acknowledge that?
Are you dishonest as well then?

So you want honesty?

Make a factual thread in ANY political forum, it will die fast. Make a drama thread the splits the people and it will live a long time. The only hope is to make a Factual Thread and create drama with someone to keep it alive :) So shut up kiddo. :)

"Kiddo"? What is this, 1937?

So either you're dishonest about not acknowledging attacking me as soon as I got here, or you're dishonest trying to save face now by pretending it was all a gimmick to ignite a thread.

Either way -- you're dishonest.
You picked the wrong guy to fuck with, Sparky. I bite back. Hard.
 
He's a socialist, so yes, he has a good chance to get party nomination.
 
Sanders is too Old School for today's bo bo Democrats; if he runs, it will have to be as an independent and he will then get the same treatment real liberals like Ralph Nader gets from the neo-liberals now. He's also too old for the job, as is Hillary.
 
Sanders is too Old School for today's bo bo Democrats; if he runs, it will have to be as an independent and he will then get the same treatment real liberals like Ralph Nader gets from the neo-liberals now. He's also too old for the job, as is Hillary.

Agree with most of that (not sure what a "bo bo Democrat" is) but -- how old is "too old"?
 
Sanders is too Old School for today's bo bo Democrats; if he runs, it will have to be as an independent and he will then get the same treatment real liberals like Ralph Nader gets from the neo-liberals now. He's also too old for the job, as is Hillary.

Agree with most of that (not sure what a "bo bo Democrat" is) but -- how old is "too old"?

David Brooks wrote a good book about them, BOBOS in Paradise: "The New Upper Class and How They Got There", that is the most comprehensive study of them in one book as you'll find anywhere. bo bo stands for 'bourgeois bohemian'.

As for age, 55 or so is pushing it, unless you're a Reagan type who intends to do very little and just screw off for 8 years as he did, 68 and over is far too old.
 
Sanders is too Old School for today's bo bo Democrats; if he runs, it will have to be as an independent and he will then get the same treatment real liberals like Ralph Nader gets from the neo-liberals now. He's also too old for the job, as is Hillary.

Agree with most of that (not sure what a "bo bo Democrat" is) but -- how old is "too old"?

David Brooks wrote a good book about them, BOBOS in Paradise: "The New Upper Class and How They Got There", that is the most comprehensive study of them in one book as you'll find anywhere. bo bo stands for 'bourgeois bohemian'.

As for age, 55 or so is pushing it, unless you're a Reagan type who intends to do very little and just screw off for 8 years as he did, 68 and over is far too old.

Really -- there's a blanket age threshhold? :lol:

What are you then -- sixteen?
 
But he has a very little chance to beat Mrs. Clinton.
If that is true at the present time it only is so because too few Americans know anything about him nor have they ever heard him speak. But there is time to change that if enough of us make an effort to do it.

Sanders knows what the problem is and he's willing to confront it head on. All we need to do is empower him and support him.
 
Perhaps you should first apologize for being an illiterate asshole.

You're actually going to sit on your ass and not acknowledge that?
Are you dishonest as well then?

So you want honesty?

Make a factual thread in ANY political forum, it will die fast. Make a drama thread the splits the people and it will live a long time. The only hope is to make a Factual Thread and create drama with someone to keep it alive :) So shut up kiddo. :)

"Kiddo"? What is this, 1937?

So either you're dishonest about not acknowledging attacking me as soon as I got here, or you're dishonest trying to save face now by pretending it was all a gimmick to ignite a thread.

Either way -- you're dishonest.
You picked the wrong guy to fuck with, Sparky. I bite back. Hard.

Again, kiddo, your post was bad English. I did make a mistake on your signature though. Happy now?

BTW your bite is very soft. Felt more like a massage to me.
 
He's a socialist, so yes, he has a good chance to get party nomination.

^ WOW, it took this dude to post that? I expected more from some others. So let's open this thread up a bit.

Sure. He's a self proclaimed Socialist.

Does this mean his he will lead our Country into Socialism? Or does he have a background in Socialism and knows how to fix our broken Crony Capitalism?
 
Perhaps you should first apologize for being an illiterate asshole.

You're actually going to sit on your ass and not acknowledge that?
Are you dishonest as well then?

So you want honesty?

Make a factual thread in ANY political forum, it will die fast. Make a drama thread the splits the people and it will live a long time. The only hope is to make a Factual Thread and create drama with someone to keep it alive :) So shut up kiddo. :)

"Kiddo"? What is this, 1937?

So either you're dishonest about not acknowledging attacking me as soon as I got here, or you're dishonest trying to save face now by pretending it was all a gimmick to ignite a thread.

Either way -- you're dishonest.
You picked the wrong guy to fuck with, Sparky. I bite back. Hard.

Again, kiddo, your post was bad English. I did make a mistake on your signature though. Happy now?

BTW your bite is very soft. Felt more like a massage to me.

Trust me hackmouth, you're in no way qualified to instruct me in English. My syntax is exactly as I design it, and always for a reason. That it may sail over your pointed head just ain't my problem.

I think you already have your hands full with simple reading comprehension and basic honesty. Best not to bite off more than you can chew. :eusa_hand:
 

Forum List

Back
Top