Barry and Michelle Obama's Law Licenses

My husband is an attorney, attorney's simply do not let their law license expire and that was the front that was given, surrendering and expiring are two different animals
Your husband is not the President
The President surrendered his law license, why? Expire and surrender are two different things
Semantics. It's his opponents that are trying to put the worst face on it, but where's the proof? Certainly not in the article cited. It's all innuendo and conjecture, NOT proof. You certainly wouldn't catch snopes being that sloppy.

Snopes? LMAO I've seen two of you nitwits scream it's not true,simply saying "it's not true" doesn't make it not true. The difference is surrendering and letting it expire, two totally different things. Given Obama refuses to expose his past only fuels suspicions

Neither Barack nor Michelle "surrendered" their Law Licenses.

Here are the statuses of the Obamas from the Illinois Bar Association:

http://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=441394592
Status: Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law

http://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=1067774464
Status: Retired - not authorized to practice law or provide pro bono services
 
My husband is an attorney, attorney's simply do not let their law license expire and that was the front that was given, surrendering and expiring are two different animals
Your husband is not the President
The President surrendered his law license, why? Expire and surrender are two different things
Semantics. It's his opponents that are trying to put the worst face on it, but where's the proof? Certainly not in the article cited. It's all innuendo and conjecture, NOT proof. You certainly wouldn't catch snopes being that sloppy.

Snopes? LMAO I've seen two of you nitwits scream it's not true,simply saying "it's not true" doesn't make it not true. The difference is surrendering and letting it expire, two totally different things. Given Obama refuses to expose his past only fuels suspicions

Neither Barack nor Michelle "surrendered" their Law Licenses.

Here are the statuses of the Obamas from the Illinois Bar Association:

http://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=441394592
Status: Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law

http://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=1067774464
Status: Retired - not authorized to practice law or provide pro bono services

Both your links read "illegal operation"...as usual you fail. Run along
 
Presidents don't need a law license

Q: Did Barack and Michelle Obama “surrender” their law licenses to avoid ethics charges?

A: No. A court official confirms that no public disciplinary proceeding has ever been brought against either of them, contrary to a false Internet rumor. By voluntarily inactivating their licenses, they avoid a requirement to take continuing education classes and pay hundreds of dollars in annual fees. Both could practice law again if they chose to do so.


Neither do supreme court justices.

But its moot because the premise of the OP is nonsense.
 
[QUOTE="theDoctorisIn, post: 13525313, member: 20452"

Neither Barack nor Michelle "surrendered" their Law Licenses.

Here are the statuses of the Obamas from the Illinois Bar Association:

http://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=441394592
Status: Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law

http://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=1067774464
Status: Retired - not authorized to practice law or provide pro bono services[/QUOTE]

"illegal operation". :alcoholic:
 
Your husband is not the President
The President surrendered his law license, why? Expire and surrender are two different things
Semantics. It's his opponents that are trying to put the worst face on it, but where's the proof? Certainly not in the article cited. It's all innuendo and conjecture, NOT proof. You certainly wouldn't catch snopes being that sloppy.

Snopes? LMAO I've seen two of you nitwits scream it's not true,simply saying "it's not true" doesn't make it not true. The difference is surrendering and letting it expire, two totally different things. Given Obama refuses to expose his past only fuels suspicions

Neither Barack nor Michelle "surrendered" their Law Licenses.

Here are the statuses of the Obamas from the Illinois Bar Association:

http://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=441394592
Status: Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law

http://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=1067774464
Status: Retired - not authorized to practice law or provide pro bono services

Both your links read "illegal operation"...as usual you fail. Run along

So the links don't work - what ever will you do?

You could try it out yourself.

Here's the link: Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission

Click "Lawyer Search", and type in "Obama".

Or you can continue to revel in ignorance, if you'd prefer.
 
Semantics. It's his opponents that are trying to put the worst face on it, but where's the proof? Certainly not in the article cited. It's all innuendo and conjecture, NOT proof. You certainly wouldn't catch snopes being that sloppy.

Cite a lie about a conservative that Snopes has ever investigated, much less proved false.


Cite a lie from the RWNJs about the Obama's that turned out to be true.

And PROVE it.
 
[QUOTE="theDoctorisIn, post: 13525313, member: 20452"

Neither Barack nor Michelle "surrendered" their Law Licenses.

Here are the statuses of the Obamas from the Illinois Bar Association:

http://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=441394592
Status: Voluntarily inactive and not authorized to practice law

http://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp?id=1067774464
Status: Retired - not authorized to practice law or provide pro bono services

"illegal operation". :alcoholic:[/QUOTE]


See post 33 and others in this thread.
 
Semantics. It's his opponents that are trying to put the worst face on it, but where's the proof? Certainly not in the article cited. It's all innuendo and conjecture, NOT proof. You certainly wouldn't catch snopes being that sloppy.
Cite a lie about a conservative that Snopes has ever investigated, much less proved false.
No problem.
Birth Rite
Dear Diary
Newt Gingrich Tweeted About San Bernardino Attack in November
Catch the Wave!
Presidential IQ
Bush Whacked
 
That's terrible. The one thing that sticks in my head about Michelle is how good she interacts with kids. Nothing ghetto about being good with kids.

Yep- she is raising two fine daughters, and as First Lady is working to help children- only a racist like HB would call that 'ghetto'
Two fine kids? He says he is glad there is abortion so they can kill his grandkids. He is sick.
 
That's terrible. The one thing that sticks in my head about Michelle is how good she interacts with kids. Nothing ghetto about being good with kids.

Yep- she is raising two fine daughters, and as First Lady is working to help children- only a racist like HB would call that 'ghetto'

Yes and she's a great supporter of Beyoncé who is a fantastic model of racism and hate for young girls.
 
That's terrible. The one thing that sticks in my head about Michelle is how good she interacts with kids. Nothing ghetto about being good with kids.

Yep- she is raising two fine daughters, and as First Lady is working to help children- only a racist like HB would call that 'ghetto'
Two fine kids? He says he is glad there is abortion so they can kill his grandkids. He is sick.

jknowgood

Liar.
 

Forum List

Back
Top