Your personal definitions have some scholarly support.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics...nt-moral-universe8212and-heres-why-it-matters
I always thought this article put it best:
Perverted, God-Hating Frenchies vs. Inbred, Sex-Obsessed Yokels
Understanding the truth (and lies) about liberals and conservatives By Steven Waldman - Beliefnet.com
The truth shall set you free. Both posts above contain what is the crux of the matter in most of these debates. We could debate whether the parameters are so obvious or fit perfectly one or the other ideology, but that is a quibble.
The only serious concern I have with either opinion is, yes, right, but there are consequences to ideas and how we live in the world. After all we are not just talking about personal ideology but how we live in the world and what we consider important. After Bush (AB) the results of one set of ideologies are in, and the scorecard is not good, so let's see how that other ideology does. It did Ok after the GD till the eighties.
"It is in the admission of ignorance and the admission of uncertainty that there is a hope for the continuous motion of human beings in some direction that doesn't get confined, permanently blocked, as it has so many times before in various periods in the history of man." Richard Feynman