Yup, I'm going to go there. I'm going to use the "I" word.

The Dems railroaded Trump since the beginning. The Russian bullshit is proof of that.
I'll repeat my question:

Which prosecutor did Biden fire for not finding enough evidence against Trump?

Correct answer is - IT NEVER HAPPENED.

There is no parralel, there is no equivalnce, there is Trump breaking law and deservingly getting prosecuted for it (just ask Trump own Attorney General named Barr)
 
Why doesn't the following "hypothetical" situation warrant impeachment?

President X openly promises his supporters he will abuse his power by exacting revenge against his perceived political enemies.

Trump (President X) has taken steps to make his campaign promise to seek 'retribution' reality, critics say​


One of prez X's targets is Letisha James whose office prosecuted him. Erik Seibert investigates but can't find sufficient evidence to charge her with a crime. Consequently, he either resigns of is fired.....

Trump (President X) says U.S. attorney investigating Letitia James didn't quit — 'I fired him!'​


........invoking memories of Nixon during the Watergate crisis.

Donald Trump’s (President X's) Firing of a Federal Prosecutor Crosses the Reddest of Lines​


As if that weren't enough he says the quiet, enormously corrupt part, out loud and very loudly.

‘We can’t delay any longer’: Trump (President X) urges Bondi to prosecute his rivals​


What elements are missing for the House to pass articles of impeachment against prez X for an obvious abuse of power...........other than a Repub lead House willing to do its constitutional duty?



Lawfare used to be fun.

What happened?

:dance: :dance: :dance:
 
Why doesn't the following "hypothetical" situation warrant impeachment?

President X openly promises his supporters he will abuse his power by exacting revenge against his perceived political enemies.

Trump (President X) has taken steps to make his campaign promise to seek 'retribution' reality, critics say​


One of prez X's targets is Letisha James whose office prosecuted him. Erik Seibert investigates but can't find sufficient evidence to charge her with a crime. Consequently, he either resigns of is fired.....

Trump (President X) says U.S. attorney investigating Letitia James didn't quit — 'I fired him!'​


........invoking memories of Nixon during the Watergate crisis.

Donald Trump’s (President X's) Firing of a Federal Prosecutor Crosses the Reddest of Lines​


As if that weren't enough he says the quiet, enormously corrupt part, out loud and very loudly.

‘We can’t delay any longer’: Trump (President X) urges Bondi to prosecute his rivals​


What elements are missing for the House to pass articles of impeachment against prez X for an obvious abuse of power...........other than a Repub lead House willing to do its constitutional duty?
BERG OH SO WANTS IT TO BE SO, PLEASE SOMEONE VALIDATE THE LIBERAL DEMOCRAT, U KNOW HOW THEY’RE INSECURE
 
I'll repeat my question:

Which prosecutor did Biden fire for not finding enough evidence against Trump?

Correct answer is - IT NEVER HAPPENED.

There is no parralel, there is no equivalnce, there is Trump breaking law and deservingly getting prosecuted for it (just ask Trump own Attorney General named Barr)
Who did Trump fire?
 
I'll repeat my question:

Which prosecutor did Biden fire for not finding enough evidence against Trump?

Correct answer is - IT NEVER HAPPENED.

There is no parralel, there is no equivalnce, there is Trump breaking law and deservingly getting prosecuted for it (just ask Trump own Attorney General named Barr)
Xiden simpl illegally appointed someone with a track record of illegal political prosecutions
 
and he would have been, but not for the break in, which is what you are now trying to shift away from, after he won a landslide election the media immediately went to work on him and after two years of leveling one false charge after another they decided they would impeach him for "losing the confidence of the people", and they went to work on republican and dissenting senators as well just to get the votes they needed in the senate, it took them two years to get enough.
No wonder you're a trumple. Your view of reality is completely fictional.
 
Which prosecutor did Biden fire for not finding enough evidence against Trump?

For god's sakes Biden didn't even fire the Trump DOJ appointed prosecutor who prosecuted and convicted his own son.


Wtf are you talking about?
They make it up as they go.
 
The Dems railroaded Trump since the beginning. The Russian bullshit is proof of that.
Rod Rosenstein, a Repub, serving in trump's first admin appointed Bob Mueller, a Repub, to conduct the investigation. Billy the Bagman, a Repub, grossly mischaracterized Mueller's findings. The Senate Intel Committee, chaired by a Repub, issued a final report even more damning than Mueller's.
 
Yeah because the previous 2 impeachments worked out so well for the Democrats; maybe spin the wheel one more time and they can manage to get Donald Trump elected to a 3rd Term. :rolleyes:

2 Impeachments, all 7 swing states, the popular vote and a partridge in a pear tree.
I have lost track of how many trumples refused to answer this question.

Why doesn't the following "hypothetical" situation warrant impeachment?

You are now one of many.
 
BERG OH SO WANTS IT TO BE SO, PLEASE SOMEONE VALIDATE THE LIBERAL DEMOCRAT, U KNOW HOW THEY’RE INSECURE
I invite you to refute that facts behind the four articles I used in the OP.
 
Prosecutors generally run on arresting and prosecuting known criminals. The State of New York has been trying to prosecute Trump since the 1990’s but had no “probable cause” to use to obtain a search warrant.

Michael Cohen gave them the probable cause they needed.

Trump has openly bragged about bribing politicians for his projects and other crimes he’s committed, including sexual assault, bribery, and using charitable donations for personal expenses.

Trump has always been a crook. He should have been jailed in the 1990’s over his phony bankruptcy scams.
Trump has always been a crook. Perhaps.

But what do you say about Nancy Pelosi's net wealth? Earned honestly? Or just got lucky with stock investments? We'll wait.

 
Who did Trump fire?

He fired Erik Siebert, his own appointed US attorney for not indicting Latisha James due to lack of evidence.

He then asigned another loyalist bimbo with no prosecutorial experience in his place.


You know what she will do? She will bring indictment Trump demands as a condition of the job, no matter how frivolous.
 
Rod Rosenstein, a Repub, serving in trump's first admin appointed Bob Mueller, a Repub, to conduct the investigation. Billy the Bagman, a Repub, grossly mischaracterized Mueller's findings. The Senate Intel Committee, chaired by a Repub, issued a final report even more damning than Mueller's.
I don't care about any reports. Its been proven that the Russian story was created by Hillary, with help from the Democratic machine.
 
I don't care about any reports. Its been proven that the Russian story was created by Hillary, with help from the Democratic machine.
Where'd you get that horseshit? Or should I say which right wing media outlet do you rely on for the lies you spew?
 
He fired Erik Siebert, his own appointed US attorney for not indicting Latisha James due to lack of evidence.

He then asigned another loyalist bimbo with no prosecutorial experience in his place.


You know what she will do? She will bring indictment Trump demands as a condition of the job, no matter how frivolous.
Not a good thing to do. But probably no worse than any president.
 
Not a good thing to do. But probably no worse than any president.
There has never been anything like that under Bush, Obama or Biden.

You are posting false equivalncy. Trump is in fact worse, much worse, which is why he is rated by historians as one of the worst we've ever had.
 
Last edited:
15th post
There has never been anything like that under Bush, Obama or Biden.

You are posting false equivalncy. Trump is in fact worse, much worse, which is why he is rated by historians as one of the worst we've ever had.
Sorry, he may make different errors, but he is certainly far from the worst.
 
He fired Erik Siebert, his own appointed US attorney for not indicting Latisha James due to lack of evidence.

He then asigned another loyalist bimbo with no prosecutorial experience in his place.


You know what she will do? She will bring indictment Trump demands as a condition of the job, no matter how frivolous.
He was never the actual US Attorney, he was an acting US Attorney

All US Attorneys are appointed by the President, same with acting US Attorneys. So not sure what you mean by "his own..."
 
Not a good thing to do. But probably no worse than any president.
You keep making excuses without providing a single example comparable to trump firing a US Attorney for not finding evidence in his spectacularly corrupt endeavor to see his perceived enemies be prosecuted.
 
Back
Top Bottom