marvin martian
Diamond Member
Biden was in mid-stage dementia (at least), and he wasn’t 25th.
He also had terminal cancer, that it seems his own "doctor" and family didn't tell him about.
Sick, sick, sick people.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Biden was in mid-stage dementia (at least), and he wasn’t 25th.
Absurdly wrong. Convictions were secured against many other violators of crimes essentially the same as trump's.Nothing new here, see Bragg, an otherwise good honest man pressured from white liberals to do pretty much what you describe, but again, it's all in play now.
I think there were 7 Repubs who voted to convict for the second impeachment.And Trump is the only president in the history of this country to have a Senator, from his own party, to vote to impeach. And hell, Trump pulled it off twice in a row.
Sounds like you're describing watergateWhat an amazingly bizarre lie. Just, astounding.
forget it, doesn't bother meOops, more whining,
what "reasons" would those be that need addressing?not a single given reason addressed.
too busy with my pinataToo busy diddling your strawman.
You shouldn't use words, when you don't know what they mean. You embarrass yourself.He keeps trolling you marxists
The reasons he gave that you ignored and for which you substituted your low IQ fantasy reason.what "reasons" would those be that need addressing?
Sounds like you jumped off the roof of the library and landed on your head, instead of reading the books within the library.Sounds like you're describing watergate
and now so too will the same claim be made against those who went after trump.Absurdly wrong. Convictions were secured against many other violators of crimes essentially the same as trump's.
and now too the justice department will go after folks they feel committed "crimes similar" to what others have committed, probably even find some new ones as well.AI Overview
Prosecutions for financial crimes similar to those committed by Donald Trump have occurred both historically and recently, involving executives, business owners, and other prominent figures. While many aspects of Trump's cases were unique due to his status as a former president, the underlying charges—including falsifying business records, tax fraud, and inflating assets—are not uncommon.
Name one then.and now so too will the same claim be made against those who went after trump.
Absurdly wrong. Convictions were secured against many other violators of crimes essentially the same as trump's.
AI Overview
Prosecutions for financial crimes similar to those committed by Donald Trump have occurred both historically and recently, involving executives, business owners, and other prominent figures. While many aspects of Trump's cases were unique due to his status as a former president, the underlying charges—including falsifying business records, tax fraud, and inflating assets—are not uncommon.
Yeah, good one, that's too embarrassing to even mock.Sounds like you jumped off the roof of the library and landed on your head, instead of reading the books within the library.
No clue what they are or will be, I'm just pointing out that the same lame excuse he used can and will be used to justify whatever it is/they areName one then.
and you keep leading with your chin.Or just wag your chin some more.
Why doesn't the following "hypothetical" situation warrant impeachment?
President X openly promises his supporters he will abuse his power by exacting revenge against his perceived political enemies.
Trump (President X) has taken steps to make his campaign promise to seek 'retribution' reality, critics say
![]()
Trump has taken steps to make his campaign promise to seek 'retribution' reality, critics say
"Using the presidency to go after political enemies is a very dangerous thing," a former White House ethics lawyer told ABC News.abcnews.go.com
One of prez X's targets is Letisha James whose office prosecuted him. Erik Seibert investigates but can't find sufficient evidence to charge her with a crime. Consequently, he either resigns of is fired.....
Why doesn't the following "hypothetical" situation warrant impeachment?
President X openly promises his supporters he will abuse his power by exacting revenge against his perceived political enemies.
Trump (President X) has taken steps to make his campaign promise to seek 'retribution' reality, critics say
![]()
Trump has taken steps to make his campaign promise to seek 'retribution' reality, critics say
"Using the presidency to go after political enemies is a very dangerous thing," a former White House ethics lawyer told ABC News.abcnews.go.com
One of prez X's targets is Letisha James whose office prosecuted him. Erik Seibert investigates but can't find sufficient evidence to charge her with a crime. Consequently, he either resigns of is fired.....
Trump (President X) says U.S. attorney investigating Letitia James didn't quit — 'I fired him!'
![]()
Trump says U.S. attorney investigating Letitia James didn't quit — 'I fired him!'
Trump said he fired Erik Siebert and withdrew his nomination for U.S. attorney — hours after the prosecutor resigned.www.usatoday.com
........invoking memories of Nixon during the Watergate crisis.
Donald Trump’s (President X's) Firing of a Federal Prosecutor Crosses the Reddest of Lines
![]()
Donald Trump’s Firing of a Federal Prosecutor Crosses the Reddest of Lines
The dismissal of Erik Siebert sends yet another ominous message about the risks of refusing to do the President’s bidding, and the lengths to which he will go to punish perceived enemies.www.newyorker.com
As if that weren't enough he says the quiet, enormously corrupt part, out loud and very loudly.
‘We can’t delay any longer’: Trump (President X) urges Bondi to prosecute his rivals
What elements are missing for the House to pass articles of impeachment against prez X for an obvious abuse of power...........other than a Repub lead House willing to do its constitutional duty?
Tell us again how they had no evidence against Nixon.Yeah, good one, that's too embarrassing to even mock.
Well of course, as Trump has committed so many impeachable offenses.Also, there doesn't need to be a reason, if dems win the house, there will be 2...3....4 more impeachments. If youre not expecting that, youre nuts
I addressed them all in one fell swoop, the fact that you disapprove so obsessively shows how desperately you want that answer to go awayThe reasons he gave that you ignored
Which you are sinking from fastand for which you substituted your low IQ fantasy reason.
yeah, whateverObviously.
You addressed none of them and substituted your low hanging fruit instead. Because uoua really either lazyminded or mentally incapable or both.I addressed them all in one fell swoop