Yup, I'm going to go there. I'm going to use the "I" word.

Nothing new here, see Bragg, an otherwise good honest man pressured from white liberals to do pretty much what you describe, but again, it's all in play now.
Absurdly wrong. Convictions were secured against many other violators of crimes essentially the same as trump's.

AI Overview

Prosecutions for financial crimes similar to those committed by Donald Trump have occurred both historically and recently, involving executives, business owners, and other prominent figures. While many aspects of Trump's cases were unique due to his status as a former president, the underlying charges—including falsifying business records, tax fraud, and inflating assets—are not uncommon.
 
And Trump is the only president in the history of this country to have a Senator, from his own party, to vote to impeach. And hell, Trump pulled it off twice in a row.
I think there were 7 Repubs who voted to convict for the second impeachment.
 
Absurdly wrong. Convictions were secured against many other violators of crimes essentially the same as trump's.
and now so too will the same claim be made against those who went after trump.
AI Overview

Prosecutions for financial crimes similar to those committed by Donald Trump have occurred both historically and recently, involving executives, business owners, and other prominent figures. While many aspects of Trump's cases were unique due to his status as a former president, the underlying charges—including falsifying business records, tax fraud, and inflating assets—are not uncommon.
and now too the justice department will go after folks they feel committed "crimes similar" to what others have committed, probably even find some new ones as well.
 
Last edited:
Absurdly wrong. Convictions were secured against many other violators of crimes essentially the same as trump's.

AI Overview

Prosecutions for financial crimes similar to those committed by Donald Trump have occurred both historically and recently, involving executives, business owners, and other prominent figures. While many aspects of Trump's cases were unique due to his status as a former president, the underlying charges—including falsifying business records, tax fraud, and inflating assets—are not uncommon.

Yeah, the mortgage fraud trials for Leticia James and Adam Schiff aren't going to go well for them, given this precedent.
 
Why doesn't the following "hypothetical" situation warrant impeachment?

President X openly promises his supporters he will abuse his power by exacting revenge against his perceived political enemies.

Trump (President X) has taken steps to make his campaign promise to seek 'retribution' reality, critics say​


One of prez X's targets is Letisha James whose office prosecuted him. Erik Seibert investigates but can't find sufficient evidence to charge her with a crime. Consequently, he either resigns of is fired.....

But james did the same thing. Why aren't you criticizing her?
 
Why doesn't the following "hypothetical" situation warrant impeachment?

President X openly promises his supporters he will abuse his power by exacting revenge against his perceived political enemies.

Trump (President X) has taken steps to make his campaign promise to seek 'retribution' reality, critics say​


One of prez X's targets is Letisha James whose office prosecuted him. Erik Seibert investigates but can't find sufficient evidence to charge her with a crime. Consequently, he either resigns of is fired.....

Trump (President X) says U.S. attorney investigating Letitia James didn't quit — 'I fired him!'​


........invoking memories of Nixon during the Watergate crisis.

Donald Trump’s (President X's) Firing of a Federal Prosecutor Crosses the Reddest of Lines​


As if that weren't enough he says the quiet, enormously corrupt part, out loud and very loudly.

‘We can’t delay any longer’: Trump (President X) urges Bondi to prosecute his rivals​


What elements are missing for the House to pass articles of impeachment against prez X for an obvious abuse of power...........other than a Repub lead House willing to do its constitutional duty?

Also, there doesn't need to be a reason, if dems win the house, there will be 2...3....4 more impeachments. If youre not expecting that, youre nuts
 
15th post
Also, there doesn't need to be a reason, if dems win the house, there will be 2...3....4 more impeachments. If youre not expecting that, youre nuts
Well of course, as Trump has committed so many impeachable offenses.

You forgot to mention it, shockingly enough.
 
I addressed them all in one fell swoop
You addressed none of them and substituted your low hanging fruit instead. Because uoua really either lazyminded or mentally incapable or both.

Now stop yer incessant crybabying and try to say something that isn't embarrassingly stupid about the topic.
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom