Yup, I'm going to go there. I'm going to use the "I" word.

I invite you to refute that facts behind the four articles I used in the OP.
OP is full of bullshit.

PROVE ME WRONG!

HTH

Thank you for your attention to this matter.
 
1. AS we have learned, impeachment only matters if your party controls the Senate in sufficient numbers to pass it.
2. Trump's declining health is such that a 25th Amendment issue may be more likely.
Yet another goofy conspiracy theorist in yet another goofy Berg conspiracy theory thread.
 
Prosecutors generally run on arresting and prosecuting known criminals. The State of New York has been trying to prosecute Trump since the 1990’s but had no “probable cause” to use to obtain a search warrant.
So you are saying the Murder Cult lawfare has been going on since the 90s.

Got it.
 
Where'd you get that horseshit? Or should I say which right wing media outlet do you rely on for the lies you spew?
You Russia, Russia, Russia freaks will forever be Hillary groupies.
 
Trump has always been a crook. He should have been jailed in the 1990’s over his phony bankruptcy scams.
that's the proof it is political, the evidence for that is your claim, in the 90's [or most anytime] before he ran for president he posed little or no threat to the status quo, in fact he facilitated it, now he is the political opposition and must be stopped at all costs "using any means necessary" including infecting the system to get him, now he is using/wielding that system for the same reason(s), payback...trumps real crime was toppling the queen, everything else stems directly and/or indirectly from that.
 
Last edited:
Why doesn't the following "hypothetical" situation warrant impeachment?

President X openly promises his supporters he will abuse his power by exacting revenge against his perceived political enemies.

Trump (President X) has taken steps to make his campaign promise to seek 'retribution' reality, critics say​


One of prez X's targets is Letisha James whose office prosecuted him. Erik Seibert investigates but can't find sufficient evidence to charge her with a crime. Consequently, he either resigns of is fired.....

Trump (President X) says U.S. attorney investigating Letitia James didn't quit — 'I fired him!'​


........invoking memories of Nixon during the Watergate crisis.

Donald Trump’s (President X's) Firing of a Federal Prosecutor Crosses the Reddest of Lines​


As if that weren't enough he says the quiet, enormously corrupt part, out loud and very loudly.

‘We can’t delay any longer’: Trump (President X) urges Bondi to prosecute his rivals​


What elements are missing for the House to pass articles of impeachment against prez X for an obvious abuse of power...........other than a Repub lead House willing to do its constitutional duty?
Accountability is not retribution its true justice
 
No one cares. You impeached him twice on partisan hate and he still got elected. Lol.
Did you know an unprecedented 7 Repub senators voted for conviction in the second impeachment? You can read about the articles of impeachment here.


To be accurate, Repubs certainly don't care about trump's illegal acts or abuses of power. But half the country does.
 
Did you know an unprecedented 7 Repub senators voted for conviction in the second impeachment? You can read about the articles of impeachment here.


To be accurate, Repubs certainly don't care about trump's illegal acts or abuses of power. But half the country does.

Dems never cared about bidens illegal abuses. Yawn.
 
He was never the actual US Attorney, he was an acting US Attorney

All US Attorneys are appointed by the President, same with acting US Attorneys. So not sure what you mean by "his own..."

Distinction without any difference.
 
Sorry, he may make different errors

Corrupt conduct of office is no "error".

He didn't somehow mean-well but made a mistake, he is a vindictive criminal who will abuse whatever official power he is given to retaliate against people he feels wronged him.
 
Last edited:
15th post
I have lost track of how many trumples refused to answer this question.

Why doesn't the following "hypothetical" situation warrant impeachment?

You are now one of many.
So what?
 
Back
Top Bottom