Yup, I'm going to go there. I'm going to use the "I" word.

[Frankeneinstein]

Tell us again how they had no evidence against Nixon.

They had nothing on him, nothing at all, he had no knowledge of the break-in.

So embarrassing. I'm embarrassed for you.

it would seem then that being embarrassed just may be your calling in life.

 

[Doc7505]

Regarding point #1, I'm not suggesting articles of impeachment have any chance of being passed in the House, let alone the Senate.

I'm asking why doesn't the series of events I referenced warrant impeachment...........under ordinary circumstances?

~~~~~~
Simply because your logic is impaired,

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

They had nothing on him, nothing at all, he had no knowledge of the break-in.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

~~~~~~
Simply because your logic is impaired,

How so?

Dude, I would give you a twenty,if you could speak articulately on logic and explain what was wrong with his.

There's $20 i will not be losing.

 

[berg80]

I very much remember it, they had nothing on nixon in watergate, nothing at all

He was told by members of his own party to resign or he would be impeached and convicted.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

He was told by members of his own party to resign or he would be impeached.

The Nixon Presidential library has an entire exhibit on the evidence.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

You addressed none of them and substituted your low hanging fruit instead. Because uoua really either lazyminded or mentally incapable or both.

We've been over this...I addressed all of them and you want the answer changed because it explained everything and leaves you with nothing.

Now stop yer incessant crybabying and try to say something that isn't embarrassingly stupid about the topic.

lol...see berg about "projection", I'm not intentionally pointing out your obvious frustrations but what the heck is "uoua" that's a new one.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

We've been over this...I addressed all of them

No, you ignored all of them and substituted a reason of your own.

This idiotic attempt isnt going to work.

"I addressed all of them by saying they are all dumb!"

So fkn stupid.

 

[berg80]

and now so too will the same claim be made against those who went after trump.

and now too the justice department will go after folks they feel committed "crimes similar" to what others have committed, probably even find some new ones as well.

Bragg is the DA for Manhattan. It wasn't a federal case.

 

[Stann]

Why doesn't the following "hypothetical" situation warrant impeachment?

President X openly promises his supporters he will abuse his power by exacting revenge against his perceived political enemies.

Trump (President X) has taken steps to make his campaign promise to seek 'retribution' reality, critics say​

Trump has taken steps to make his campaign promise to seek 'retribution' reality, critics say

"Using the presidency to go after political enemies is a very dangerous thing," a former White House ethics lawyer told ABC News.

abcnews.go.com

One of prez X's targets is Letisha James whose office prosecuted him. Erik Seibert investigates but can't find sufficient evidence to charge her with a crime. Consequently, he either resigns of is fired.....

Trump (President X) says U.S. attorney investigating Letitia James didn't quit — 'I fired him!'​

Trump says U.S. attorney investigating Letitia James didn't quit — 'I fired him!'

Trump said he fired Erik Siebert and withdrew his nomination for U.S. attorney — hours after the prosecutor resigned.

www.usatoday.com

........invoking memories of Nixon during the Watergate crisis.

Donald Trump’s (President X's) Firing of a Federal Prosecutor Crosses the Reddest of Lines​

Donald Trump’s Firing of a Federal Prosecutor Crosses the Reddest of Lines

The dismissal of Erik Siebert sends yet another ominous message about the risks of refusing to do the President’s bidding, and the lengths to which he will go to punish perceived enemies.

www.newyorker.com

As if that weren't enough he says the quiet, enormously corrupt part, out loud and very loudly.

‘We can’t delay any longer’: Trump (President X) urges Bondi to prosecute his rivals​

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/09/20/trump-bondi-truth-social-00574380

What elements are missing for the House to pass articles of impeachment against prez X for an obvious abuse of power...........other than a Repub lead House willing to do its constitutional duty?

I'm not concerned , trump continues to spiral out of control. He is finishing himself off.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

He was told by members of his own party to resign or he would be impeached.

and he would have been, but not for the break in, which is what you are now trying to shift away from, after he won a landslide election the media immediately went to work on him and after two years of leveling one false charge after another they decided they would impeach him for "losing the confidence of the people", and they went to work on republican and dissenting senators as well just to get the votes they needed in the senate, it took them two years to get enough.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Bragg is the DA for Manhattan. It wasn't a federal case.

non sequitur

 

[Frankeneinstein]

No, you ignored all of them and substituted a reason of your own.

This idiotic attempt isnt going to work.

"I addressed all of them by saying they are all dumb!"

So fkn stupid.

well as long as it isn't getting so far under your skin that you can't take it for even another second then I'm ok with it too.

 

[Doc7505]

My apologies. I should have prefaced my hypothetical by asking that no one go down the road of specious whataboutisms or factually inaccurate analogies. The exercise is to simply look at the facts I've laid out and answer why they don't warrant impeachment?

~~~~~~
Then you should begin to use basic logic to make your point, rather than hypothetical and unsubstantiated Bull Scat...

 

[berg80]

~~~~~~
Simply because your logic is impaired,

Explain how.

 

[berg80]

~~~~~~
Then you should begin to use basic logic to make your point, rather than hypothetical and unsubstantiated Bull Scat...

I guess you didn't notice everything I cited actually happened. Did you read any of the linked material?

 

[AntonToo]

Why are you pissed when Trump is simply doing to them what they had done to him?

Which prosecutor did Biden fire for not finding enough evidence against Trump?

For god's sakes Biden didn't even fire the Trump DOJ appointed prosecutor who prosecuted and convicted his own son.


Wtf are you talking about?

 

[cowboy fan]

You shouldn't use words, when you don't know what they mean. You embarrass yourself.

You shouldn't use punctuation when you don't know how to use it.

 

[80zephyr]

Which prosecutor did Biden fire for not finding enough evidence against Trump?

For god's sakes Biden didn't even fire the Trump DOJ appointed prosecutor who prosecuted and convicted his own son.


Wtf are you talking about?

The Dems railroaded Trump since the beginning. The Russian bullshit is proof of that.

 

[NetJedi]

Why doesn't the following "hypothetical" situation warrant impeachment?

Yeah because the previous 2 impeachments worked out so well for the Democrats; maybe spin the wheel one more time and they can manage to get Donald Trump elected to a 3rd Term.

2 Impeachments, all 7 swing states, the popular vote and a partridge in a pear tree.