Yup, I'm going to go there. I'm going to use the "I" word.

Publicly calling for a president's assassination is against the law.
You have no link to back up your previous assertion and you haven't answered my quiz making another previous assertion a pile of dung. You're not having a good day.
 
You have no link to back up your previous assertion and you haven't answered my quiz making another previous assertion a pile of dung. You're not having a good day.

Your quiz?

LOL

Publicly calling for the president's assassination is against the law, and you people do it all the time.
 
My apologies. I should have prefaced my hypothetical by asking that no one go down the road of specious whataboutisms or factually inaccurate analogies. The exercise is to simply look at the facts I've laid out and answer why they don't warrant impeachment?
All you 'laid out' were Democrat, legacy media talking point lies.
 
All you 'laid out' were Democrat, legacy media talking point lies.

And he didn't even mention the fact that President Trump was shot in the head by a deranged leftist who was radicalized and encouraged by the entire DemoKKKrat party. Who wouldn't seek revenge?
 
And he didn't even mention the fact that President Trump was shot in the head by a deranged leftist who was radicalized and encouraged by the entire DemoKKKrat party. Who wouldn't seek revenge?
Of course he didn't, his Marxist minders wouldn't like to hear again that they failed to 'get Trump.'
 
The difference being trump fired a US Attorney because he did not find evidence sufficient to charge one of trump's enemies. Then he pressured the AG to bring charges against a number of perceived enemies, violating the tradition of the DoJ's independence from the executive on prosecutorial matters.
Nothing new here, see Bragg, an otherwise good honest man pressured from white liberals to do pretty much what you describe, but again, it's all in play now.
 
Nothing new here, see Bragg, an otherwise good honest man pressured from white liberals to do pretty much what you describe, but again, it's all in play now.
These are of course lies you are making up out of thin air, since you had no good counterpoint.
 
The "Saturday Night Massacre" refers to President Richard Nixon's firing of Watergate Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox on October 20, 1973. This event triggered a constitutional crisis and public outrage because it was viewed as a blatant attempt to obstruct the ongoing Watergate investigation.
I very much remember it, they had nothing on nixon in watergate, nothing at all, the gop did try to retaliate against jimmy carter but the media and powers that be shut it down, nixon won a landslide election, something desperately needed to be done about him.
 
This is your lazyminded way of avoiding all of the reasons that were actually presented.

Expected.
It is a cut and paste of the entire post, but of course as you know it takes nothing more than a lazy mind to dispute and disperse a liberal mind, so even if not the case why would you not expect it.
 
1. AS we have learned, impeachment only matters if your party controls the Senate in sufficient numbers to pass it.
2. Trump's declining health is such that a 25th Amendment issue may be more likely.
Biden was in mid-stage dementia (at least), and he wasn’t 25th.
 
OP never identified the "I" word. Perhaps there should be a snowflake dictionary for libs. It should have all these words that make them cry.
 
OP never identified the "I" word. Perhaps there should be a snowflake dictionary for libs. It should have all these words that make them cry.
He assumed grown men and women would possess the brain power to figure out the word themselves.
 
15th post
It is a cut and paste of the entire post, but of course as you know it takes nothing more than a lazy mind to dispute and disperse a liberal mind, so even if not the case why would you not expect it.
Oops, more whining, not a single given reason addressed. Too busy diddling your strawman.
 
Of course you are! Your retarded Democrats have already wasted our time and money on two phony impeachments, why not 3? Or 4? Go for it, it's not like they any other responsibilities other than bash Trump.
And Trump is the only president in the history of this country to have a Senator, from his own party, to vote to impeach. And hell, Trump pulled it off twice in a row.

Look, the man has obvious health issues. But we are literally walking into a ban saw when it comes to the economy. Inflation is just beginning to heat up, and that fed interest rate cut, it is only going to heat it up further. I doubt it does a thing for employment and, if anything, the yield on the ten-year Treasury is up. That ain't good. The dollar is only going to slip further, not like Trump is not setting records with the declines he has already delivered.

Are we going to have a government shutdown? Are those ACA subsidies that important? From both parties standpoint, I think so. But next spring could look really bad. At some point, Trump is not going to be an ally, he is going to be a flippin albatross hanging on the necks of any Republicans that haven't stood up to him. You can see it rumbling now, Ted Cruz.
 
Back
Top Bottom