far more, they can and do Crick>>>Show us that one group contains experience and the other, vested interest and that the two attributes can't coexist in an individual.
~S~
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
far more, they can and do Crick>>>Show us that one group contains experience and the other, vested interest and that the two attributes can't coexist in an individual.
Your arguments so far are unsupported and irrelevant. The vast majority of mainstream science - who are NOT lying to us, who are NOT playing a hoax to get rich, who are NOT evil democrats intent on destroying modern civilization - fully accept AGW, believe we should have acted on the problem decades ago and that it is very likely too late to avoid serious repercussions. This isn't a scam, it's a real threat that far too many people have been ignoring, minimizing or rejecting outright. The problem we face is made by you and your ilk: ignorant cowards who seem to have no problem pushing what you KNOW to be outright lies.
Thinking the renewable industry doesn't operate like any other is rather naive CrickYour arguments so far are unsupported and irrelevant. The vast majority of mainstream science - who are NOT lying to us, who are NOT playing a hoax to get rich, who are NOT evil democrats intent on destroying modern civilization - fully accept AGW, believe we should have acted on the problem decades ago and that it is very likely too late to avoid serious repercussions. This isn't a scam, it's a real threat that far too many people have been ignoring, minimizing or rejecting outright. The problem we face is made by you and your ilk: ignorant cowards who seem to have no problem pushing what you KNOW to be outright lies.
Your arguments so far are unsupported and irrelevant. The vast majority of mainstream science - who are NOT lying to us, who are NOT playing a hoax to get rich, who are NOT evil democrats intent on destroying modern civilization - fully accept AGW, believe we should have acted on the problem decades ago and that it is very likely too late to avoid serious repercussions. This isn't a scam, it's a real threat that far too many people have been ignoring, minimizing or rejecting outright. The problem we face is made by you and your ilk: ignorant cowards who seem to have no problem pushing what you KNOW to be outright lies.
In your opinion, not theirs.Yet nuke is their only viable remedy
~S~
mainstream science? name them. Don't post IPCC, name these mainstream scientists you think own climate?Your arguments so far are unsupported and irrelevant. The vast majority of mainstream science - who are NOT lying to us, who are NOT playing a hoax to get rich, who are NOT evil democrats intent on destroying modern civilization - fully accept AGW, believe we should have acted on the problem decades ago and that it is very likely too late to avoid serious repercussions. This isn't a scam, it's a real threat that far too many people have been ignoring, minimizing or rejecting outright. The problem we face is made by you and your ilk: ignorant cowards who seem to have no problem pushing what you KNOW to be outright lies.
Don't let a manufactured crisis go to waste.Fear combined with hope can motivate the public to act rather than make people feel helpless
Opinion: I’m a climate scientist. If you knew what I know, you’d be terrified too
mainstream science? name them. Don't post IPCC, name these mainstream scientists you think own climate?
Who pays your mainstream scientists? You think they do it for free? hahahahahahahaahahahahaha!
Fully accepted? by whom, name them!!! again, not IPCC, name a set of scientists. It seems you never have any actual names you can throw out, yet our rebuttals always have names. Again, Go to this youtube site and listen to the number of scientists who disagree and don't accept your fking nonsense.
1. I don't have the equipment to take co2 readings, and over a period of time, so no idea.1. Do you believe CO2 levels in the atmosphere are rising?
2. Do you believe that is due to human CO2 emissions?
3. Do you believe the planet is getting warmer?
4. Do you believe data on upward long wave radiation from the warmed Earth?
5. Do you believe the absorption spectrum data provided for CO2?
6. Do you believe in the greenhouse effect?
7. Do you believe the theory of anthropogenic global warming?
Do you believe CO2 levels in the atmosphere are rising?
Do you believe that is due to human CO2 emissions?
Do you believe the planet is getting warmer?
Do you believe data on upward long wave radiation from the warmed Earth?
Do you believe the absorption spectrum data provided for CO2?
Do you believe in the greenhouse effect?
Do you believe the theory of anthropogenic global warming?
The IPCC just published a peer reviewed paper “How a diet of crickets can slow the Atlantic overturning”How many windmills to speed up the current? $76 trillion?
Even you can do some scientific experiment/research, say the effects of co2 on the shape of tree bark (as a weird made up example). Then you want it to be credible and therefore accepted and published in the scientific world.Fear combined with hope can motivate the public to act rather than make people feel helpless
And you accuse my side of wanting to return us to the stone age. If our government had not been funding and conducting research, we would not have a host of technologies and a wealth of knowledge that have improved all our lives.
75 Breakthroughs by America's National Laboratories
Read about some of the ways the National Laboratories have changed and improved the lives of millions of people for more than 75 years.www.energy.gov50 inventions you might not know were funded by the US government
Stacker compiled information on 50 inventions funded by the United States government using government and scientific reports, and news articles.stacker.com12 Irreplaceable Innovations Made Possible By NSF
NSF-funded research laid the foundation for many groundbreaking discoveries and game-changing technologieswww.nsf.gov
That’s an add set of questions for a purportedly scientific topic.
Seven “do you believe” questions sounds more like a religious catechism,