Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You continually crow about the IPCC's 'peer reviewed' findings, which are published for review and comment by other experts with the same or differing views, often challenging the published articles findings. I think that's how the scientific process is supposed to work, you know, debate and challenge or support the 'peer reviewed' articles.What I like talking about is science and how stupid the lot of you all are.
I lack your fascination with EVs. What I like talking about is science and how stupid the lot of you all are.
The IPCC conducts NO research. Their job is to ASSESS published climate science in light of observed warming and the theory that it is primarily being caused by human GHG emissions. Now, let me repeat the important part: the IPCC CONDUCTS NO RESEARCH. Versteht?You continually crow about the IPCC's 'peer reviewed' findings, which are published for review and comment by other experts with the same or differing views, often challenging the published articles findings. I think that's how the scientific process is supposed to work, you know, debate and challenge or support the 'peer reviewed' articles.
Can you list the peer reviews from what you have labeled 'climate deniers' with opposite views supported by their facts and findings?
Exactly, no science! Confirming my statement you have never provided anything from a scientistThe IPCC conducts NO research. Their job is to ASSESS published climate science in light of observed warming and the theory that it is primarily being caused by human GHG emissions. Now, let me repeat the important part: the IPCC CONDUCTS NO RESEARCH. Versteht?
Why are you continually crowing over IPCC's 'peer reviewed findings' then?The IPCC conducts NO research. Their job is to ASSESS published climate science in light of observed warming and the theory that it is primarily being caused by human GHG emissions. Now, let me repeat the important part: the IPCC CONDUCTS NO RESEARCH. Versteht?
They assess peer reviewed studies. The IPCC has a large staff of top of the line scientists who discuss, write and review their reports. I have NEVER claimed that the IPCC conducts research. I have repeatedly stated here that they do not. Try to keep up.Why are you continually crowing over IPCC's 'peer reviewed findings' then?
Ahhhh.....finally admitting what I claimed.They assess peer reviewed studies.
Looks like all you;re doing is treading water.Try to keep up.
I never said you did, nor did I.I have NEVER claimed that the IPCC conducts research.
Like I asked earlier, how many of those peer reviewed reports were open to counter opinions/views?The IPCC has a large staff of top of the line scientists who discuss, write and review their reports.
Wrong.Ahhhh.....finally admitting what I claimed.
All of them.Like I asked earlier, how many of those peer reviewed reports were open to counter opinions/views?
IPCC I Protect Communist ChinaYou continually crow about the IPCC's 'peer reviewed' findings, which are published for review and comment by other experts with the same or differing views, often challenging the published articles findings. I think that's how the scientific process is supposed to work, you know, debate and challenge or support the 'peer reviewed' articles.
Can you list the peer reviews from what you have labeled 'climate deniers' with opposite views supported by their facts and findings?
Ok, how many were challenged by scientists with counter opinions/ views?Wrong.
All of them.
Look it up yourself. There are comments in the text of the IPCC's reports any time there were significant debate about facts, reasoning or conclusions. The IPCC is well known for their calibrated language regarding the certainty of different conclusions. But you've never read a single page of it, have you.Ok, how many were challenged by scientists with counter opinions/ views?
Please list them.
I fixed you incorrect statement, crickThey assess peer reviewed studies. The IPCC has a large staff of top of the line scientists who discuss, write and review their reports. I have NEVER claimed that the IPCC conducts research. I have repeatedly stated here that they do not. Try to keep up.
Deniers have no place at IPCCOk, how many were challenged by scientists with counter opinions/ views?
Please list them.
As a matter of fact I did..... you already tried that angle before.Look it up yourself. There are comments in the text of the IPCC's reports any time there were significant debate about facts, reasoning or conclusions. The IPCC is well known for their calibrated language regarding the certainty of different conclusions. But you've never read a single page of it, have you.
As a matter of fact I did..... you already tried that angle before.
So you aren't aware of any counter opinions to your 'peer reviewed ' studies then.....got it.
The IPCC conducts NO research. Their job is to ASSESS published climate science in light of observed warming and the theory that it is primarily being caused by human GHG emissions. Now, let me repeat the important part: the IPCC CONDUCTS NO RESEARCH. Versteht?
What he knows is that he has a hefty government grant depending on his support of climate change. He's terrified of losing it.Fear combined with hope can motivate the public to act rather than make people feel helpless
Opinion: I’m a climate scientist. If you knew what I know, you’d be terrified too
Someone else has been crowing over the IPCC and their touting of 'peer reviewed' studies as actual non biased science...........like I asked, where were the opinions/reviews from scientists with opposing views.Nitpick ... the IPCC report is not peer-reviewed ... it's strictly political opinion ... you can tell because the IPCC is intolerant of opposition ...
Look how they ridiculed and ostracized their recent hosts in Dubai ... just plain rude ...
Yep. And that is how the Dems will turn our Country into a "Peoples Republic". Like the Paradise known as Cuba.Of course....Terrified people are easy to manipulate.
Fuck off.
