Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They're coming for our guns....just like they have been for 80 years....
You guys will believe anything.
i found 4 links saying the gateway pundit spreads lies and I'm the liar?And folks like you tend to lie everyday, in my experience.
What does it have to do with ignoring existing LAWS?Last year Democrats came up with Anti-Gun legislation that would allow the police to just show up at your door with warrant to search your home for weapons - legally owned weapons, and seize them BASED ON ANY CLAIM BY SOMEONE WHO CLAIMS YOU HAVE 'MENTAL ISSUES'.
The claim can be made by ANYONE - your neighbor, the employee at work you fired, an ex...anyone. According to the legislation that would be enough for authorities / the police to raid your home and take your firearms, and, according to the legislation, you would automatically be considered 'GUILTY' of having some mental problem that would make you a threat to own a firearm. Your firearm? GONE.
In this liberal nightmare you would be 'Guilty until proven innocent'. The burden of proof would be on the ACCUSED. YOU would have to work to obtain a court date to PROVE you did not have a 'mental problem' and deserved to be entrusted with your right to bare arms / own a weapon. Legislators admitted that the process for that to happen would be over a year....and THEY got to decide what defines a mental problem disqualifying you for the right to not only get back your weapons but to ever own one again.
From the story above we can see that brandishing a legally owned gun on your own property in defense of yourself, your loved ones, and your home would be considered a sign of 'mental instability' justifying your arrest on your own property, seizure of all of your weapons, and your being charged with a crime, taunted by the criminals surrounding the police car ON YOUR PROPERTY as the police stick YOU in the back f the police car.
'Mental Instability', as we can also see from the news above, is NOT being triggered mentally yourself so badly by a Pro-Trump Sign and / or Confederate Flag that you illegally trespass and threaten someone, their family, and their home!
Mental Instability to liberal extremist, Trump-Hating, anti-Constitutional Socialists is being a Conservative, supporting Trump, supporting the Constitution and having Constitutionally protected rights, supporting the right to own firearms and the God-given right to defend yourself, your family, and your home.
Trump says take guns first and worry about 'due process second' in White House gun meeting
Home owners are not likely to commit violence unless POS criminals like BLM trespasses, surrounds your house, and threatens them, their families, and their homes.
What does that have to do with ignoring due process?
The mob trespassed.
The mob threatened the man and his home on HIS property.
The man reportedly legally owned the gun.
The man legally stood his ground.
The man has a right to defend his property / home / life.
Yeah, they never get tired of trying.They're coming for our guns....just like they have been for 80 years....
You guys will believe anything.
They're persistent, I'll give them that.
If they were coming for your guns they would have already done it.Same goes for you: If they're not "coming for our guns",then you should have no problem with me owning as many assault weapons, high-capacity magazines, and as much ammunition as I want, as well as the right to use them against anyone who is a threat to me, my family members, or my property.
You believe everything you read on the internet?i found 4 links saying the gateway pundit spreads lies and I'm the liar?And folks like you tend to lie everyday, in my experience.
Too funny.
Last year Democrats came up with Anti-Gun legislation that would allow the police to just show up at your door with warrant to search your home for weapons - legally owned weapons, and seize them BASED ON ANY CLAIM BY SOMEONE WHO CLAIMS YOU HAVE 'MENTAL ISSUES'.
The claim can be made by ANYONE - your neighbor, the employee at work you fired, an ex...anyone. According to the legislation that would be enough for authorities / the police to raid your home and take your firearms, and, according to the legislation, you would automatically be considered 'GUILTY' of having some mental problem that would make you a threat to own a firearm. Your firearm? GONE.
In this liberal nightmare you would be 'Guilty until proven innocent'. The burden of proof would be on the ACCUSED. YOU would have to work to obtain a court date to PROVE you did not have a 'mental problem' and deserved to be entrusted with your right to bare arms / own a weapon. Legislators admitted that the process for that to happen would be over a year....and THEY got to decide what defines a mental problem disqualifying you for the right to not only get back your weapons but to ever own one again.
From the story above we can see that brandishing a legally owned gun on your own property in defense of yourself, your loved ones, and your home would be considered a sign of 'mental instability' justifying your arrest on your own property, seizure of all of your weapons, and your being charged with a crime, taunted by the criminals surrounding the police car ON YOUR PROPERTY as the police stick YOU in the back f the police car.
'Mental Instability', as we can also see from the news above, is NOT being triggered mentally yourself so badly by a Pro-Trump Sign and / or Confederate Flag that you illegally trespass and threaten someone, their family, and their home!
Mental Instability to liberal extremist, Trump-Hating, anti-Constitutional Socialists is being a Conservative, supporting Trump, supporting the Constitution and having Constitutionally protected rights, supporting the right to own firearms and the God-given right to defend yourself, your family, and your home.
Trump says take guns first and worry about 'due process second' in White House gun meeting
Home owners are not likely to commit violence unless POS criminals like BLM trespasses, surrounds your house, and threatens them, their families, and their homes.
What does that have to do with ignoring due process?
Do law-enforcement officers "ignore" due process when some thug points a gun at them and has to be shot? They do not carry weapons to protect you, and the Supreme Court has already ruled that law-enforcement actually has no "duty to protect." They carry weapons to protect themselves, not for your benefit.
Therefore why is in unreasonable that a legally-armed citizen uses deadly force to protect his own life, and the lives of his family? That's called "personal responsibility."
No. I check things out. I checked out gateway pundit and in my opinion they are biased right wing fake news.You believe everything you read on the internet?
Actually, the first gun control laws in the US were Jim Crow laws, and the first federal gun control law was enacted in the 1930's.Yeah, they never get tired of trying.They're coming for our guns....just like they have been for 80 years....
You guys will believe anything.
They're persistent, I'll give them that.
Right.
They've been trying to scare you that your 2nd Amendment rights are going to be taken away any moment now.
Yeah, I did too, and I disagree.No. I check things out. I checked out gateway pundit and in my opinion they are biased right wing fake news.You believe everything you read on the internet?
Last year Democrats came up with Anti-Gun legislation that would allow the police to just show up at your door with warrant to search your home for weapons - legally owned weapons, and seize them BASED ON ANY CLAIM BY SOMEONE WHO CLAIMS YOU HAVE 'MENTAL ISSUES'.
The claim can be made by ANYONE - your neighbor, the employee at work you fired, an ex...anyone. According to the legislation that would be enough for authorities / the police to raid your home and take your firearms, and, according to the legislation, you would automatically be considered 'GUILTY' of having some mental problem that would make you a threat to own a firearm. Your firearm? GONE.
In this liberal nightmare you would be 'Guilty until proven innocent'. The burden of proof would be on the ACCUSED. YOU would have to work to obtain a court date to PROVE you did not have a 'mental problem' and deserved to be entrusted with your right to bare arms / own a weapon. Legislators admitted that the process for that to happen would be over a year....and THEY got to decide what defines a mental problem disqualifying you for the right to not only get back your weapons but to ever own one again.
From the story above we can see that brandishing a legally owned gun on your own property in defense of yourself, your loved ones, and your home would be considered a sign of 'mental instability' justifying your arrest on your own property, seizure of all of your weapons, and your being charged with a crime, taunted by the criminals surrounding the police car ON YOUR PROPERTY as the police stick YOU in the back f the police car.
'Mental Instability', as we can also see from the news above, is NOT being triggered mentally yourself so badly by a Pro-Trump Sign and / or Confederate Flag that you illegally trespass and threaten someone, their family, and their home!
Mental Instability to liberal extremist, Trump-Hating, anti-Constitutional Socialists is being a Conservative, supporting Trump, supporting the Constitution and having Constitutionally protected rights, supporting the right to own firearms and the God-given right to defend yourself, your family, and your home.
Trump says take guns first and worry about 'due process second' in White House gun meeting
Home owners are not likely to commit violence unless POS criminals like BLM trespasses, surrounds your house, and threatens them, their families, and their homes.
What does that have to do with ignoring due process?
Do law-enforcement officers "ignore" due process when some thug points a gun at them and has to be shot? They do not carry weapons to protect you, and the Supreme Court has already ruled that law-enforcement actually has no "duty to protect." They carry weapons to protect themselves, not for your benefit.
Therefore why is in unreasonable that a legally-armed citizen uses deadly force to protect his own life, and the lives of his family? That's called "personal responsibility."
It isn't. Now what about Trump saying he would take someone's guns while ignoring due process?
Should have been shot.The trespasser were charged .View attachment 389300
...and it has happened again:
BREAKING: Milwaukee Trump Supporter
Arrested for Brandishing a Gun at Black Lives
Matter Mob That Was Surrounding His Home
We are continuing to see Americans under liberal leadership / control will NOT be allowed to protect themselves. on their own property with their own legally purchased / owned firearms.
Mark and Patricia McCloskey were the 1st 2 Americans targeted for defending their lives and homes from a violent BLM mob who have broken through their community gate, trespasses, and threatened them and their home. For defending their home their home was raided, all legally-owned firearms were seized, and they have been charged with FELONIES for standing their ground and protecting their lives....in a state that has the 'Stand Your Ground' and allows CCP carry of legally owned weapons.
Once again, a BLM mob trespassed on the private property of a Trump Supporter and was surrounding his home...on HIS property. It was reported the homeowner was arrested for protecting himself and his property, and HE - and only he -was removed from HIS property. As the police arrested him the mob - on HIS property - mocked and harassed HIM.
On social media members of the mob claimed they were justified in trespassing on his property, justified in harassing and threatening him, and HIS being arrested for brandishing a weapon in the defense of himself and his home, which they had surrounded, was justified because HE IS A 'RACIST' AND 'HE HAS A CONFEDERATE FLAG'.
The police say the BLM mob went to his house intentionally to protest him for being a 'racist' (THEY say).
BLM thugs went to this man's house, trespassed onto his property, surrounded his house, & threatened him and his home.
On his own property, in fear of his life / property, with the police not responding / being there, he stood his ground on his own property with a legally owned weapon, showing the criminal mob he would protect his home on his property if needed.
Despite the BLM thugs illegally being on his property, Despite the BLM thugs threatening him and his property, despite the reported existence of laws allowing the homeowner to protect himself and his property, The HOMEOWNER was arrested and removed from his property. The police did NOT remove the BLM thugs who were on the man's property ILLEGALLY.
The homeowner then had to endure being arrested on his own property while being mocked by BLM criminal thugs who were there on his property illegally and who were NOT being removed from his property for trespassing....
The homeowner has now had his legally owned firearm confiscated, I am sure, like the McCloskey's, the authorities will go through his home and confiscate all of his legally owned firearms, and he is being charged with at least 1 crime....for defending his life and home from foreign-funded criminal Domestic Terrorists.
The message is being sent loud and clear:
You may have the right to own a gun, but liberals are denying you the right to use that weapon on your own property to defend yourself, your family, and your home against radical leftist extremist criminals who are on your property illegal, threatening you, your loved pones, and your homes! Hell yeah, we're coming for your guns!
BREAKING: Milwaukee Trump Supporter Arrested for Brandishing a Gun at Black Lives Matter Mob That Was Surrounding His Home (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald
A Milwaukee man has reportedly been arrested after pulling a gun on a mob of Black Lives Matter supporters who were surrounding his home for several hours.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Last year Democrats came up with Anti-Gun legislation that would allow the police to just show up at your door with warrant to search your home for weapons - legally owned weapons, and seize them BASED ON ANY CLAIM BY SOMEONE WHO CLAIMS YOU HAVE 'MENTAL ISSUES'.
The claim can be made by ANYONE - your neighbor, the employee at work you fired, an ex...anyone. According to the legislation that would be enough for authorities / the police to raid your home and take your firearms, and, according to the legislation, you would automatically be considered 'GUILTY' of having some mental problem that would make you a threat to own a firearm. Your firearm? GONE.
In this liberal nightmare you would be 'Guilty until proven innocent'. The burden of proof would be on the ACCUSED. YOU would have to work to obtain a court date to PROVE you did not have a 'mental problem' and deserved to be entrusted with your right to bare arms / own a weapon. Legislators admitted that the process for that to happen would be over a year....and THEY got to decide what defines a mental problem disqualifying you for the right to not only get back your weapons but to ever own one again.
From the story above we can see that brandishing a legally owned gun on your own property in defense of yourself, your loved ones, and your home would be considered a sign of 'mental instability' justifying your arrest on your own property, seizure of all of your weapons, and your being charged with a crime, taunted by the criminals surrounding the police car ON YOUR PROPERTY as the police stick YOU in the back f the police car.
'Mental Instability', as we can also see from the news above, is NOT being triggered mentally yourself so badly by a Pro-Trump Sign and / or Confederate Flag that you illegally trespass and threaten someone, their family, and their home!
Mental Instability to liberal extremist, Trump-Hating, anti-Constitutional Socialists is being a Conservative, supporting Trump, supporting the Constitution and having Constitutionally protected rights, supporting the right to own firearms and the God-given right to defend yourself, your family, and your home.
Trump says take guns first and worry about 'due process second' in White House gun meeting
Home owners are not likely to commit violence unless POS criminals like BLM trespasses, surrounds your house, and threatens them, their families, and their homes.
What does that have to do with ignoring due process?
Do law-enforcement officers "ignore" due process when some thug points a gun at them and has to be shot? They do not carry weapons to protect you, and the Supreme Court has already ruled that law-enforcement actually has no "duty to protect." They carry weapons to protect themselves, not for your benefit.
Therefore why is in unreasonable that a legally-armed citizen uses deadly force to protect his own life, and the lives of his family? That's called "personal responsibility."
It isn't. Now what about Trump saying he would take someone's guns while ignoring due process?
Though he has misspoken a few times, I value actions more than words. And his actions speak far more than a couple misspoken words. In fact, this is the first President who has delivered far, far more than he promised.
Last year Democrats came up with Anti-Gun legislation that would allow the police to just show up at your door with warrant to search your home for weapons - legally owned weapons, and seize them BASED ON ANY CLAIM BY SOMEONE WHO CLAIMS YOU HAVE 'MENTAL ISSUES'.
The claim can be made by ANYONE - your neighbor, the employee at work you fired, an ex...anyone. According to the legislation that would be enough for authorities / the police to raid your home and take your firearms, and, according to the legislation, you would automatically be considered 'GUILTY' of having some mental problem that would make you a threat to own a firearm. Your firearm? GONE.
In this liberal nightmare you would be 'Guilty until proven innocent'. The burden of proof would be on the ACCUSED. YOU would have to work to obtain a court date to PROVE you did not have a 'mental problem' and deserved to be entrusted with your right to bare arms / own a weapon. Legislators admitted that the process for that to happen would be over a year....and THEY got to decide what defines a mental problem disqualifying you for the right to not only get back your weapons but to ever own one again.
From the story above we can see that brandishing a legally owned gun on your own property in defense of yourself, your loved ones, and your home would be considered a sign of 'mental instability' justifying your arrest on your own property, seizure of all of your weapons, and your being charged with a crime, taunted by the criminals surrounding the police car ON YOUR PROPERTY as the police stick YOU in the back f the police car.
'Mental Instability', as we can also see from the news above, is NOT being triggered mentally yourself so badly by a Pro-Trump Sign and / or Confederate Flag that you illegally trespass and threaten someone, their family, and their home!
Mental Instability to liberal extremist, Trump-Hating, anti-Constitutional Socialists is being a Conservative, supporting Trump, supporting the Constitution and having Constitutionally protected rights, supporting the right to own firearms and the God-given right to defend yourself, your family, and your home.
Trump says take guns first and worry about 'due process second' in White House gun meeting
Home owners are not likely to commit violence unless POS criminals like BLM trespasses, surrounds your house, and threatens them, their families, and their homes.
What does that have to do with ignoring due process?
Do law-enforcement officers "ignore" due process when some thug points a gun at them and has to be shot? They do not carry weapons to protect you, and the Supreme Court has already ruled that law-enforcement actually has no "duty to protect." They carry weapons to protect themselves, not for your benefit.
Therefore why is in unreasonable that a legally-armed citizen uses deadly force to protect his own life, and the lives of his family? That's called "personal responsibility."
It isn't. Now what about Trump saying he would take someone's guns while ignoring due process?
Though he has misspoken a few times, I value actions more than words. And his actions speak far more than a couple misspoken words. In fact, this is the first President who has delivered far, far more than he promised.
So you knew he was lying and it didn't bother you because of that.
Should have been shot.The trespasser were charged .View attachment 389300
...and it has happened again:
BREAKING: Milwaukee Trump Supporter
Arrested for Brandishing a Gun at Black Lives
Matter Mob That Was Surrounding His Home
We are continuing to see Americans under liberal leadership / control will NOT be allowed to protect themselves. on their own property with their own legally purchased / owned firearms.
Mark and Patricia McCloskey were the 1st 2 Americans targeted for defending their lives and homes from a violent BLM mob who have broken through their community gate, trespasses, and threatened them and their home. For defending their home their home was raided, all legally-owned firearms were seized, and they have been charged with FELONIES for standing their ground and protecting their lives....in a state that has the 'Stand Your Ground' and allows CCP carry of legally owned weapons.
Once again, a BLM mob trespassed on the private property of a Trump Supporter and was surrounding his home...on HIS property. It was reported the homeowner was arrested for protecting himself and his property, and HE - and only he -was removed from HIS property. As the police arrested him the mob - on HIS property - mocked and harassed HIM.
On social media members of the mob claimed they were justified in trespassing on his property, justified in harassing and threatening him, and HIS being arrested for brandishing a weapon in the defense of himself and his home, which they had surrounded, was justified because HE IS A 'RACIST' AND 'HE HAS A CONFEDERATE FLAG'.
The police say the BLM mob went to his house intentionally to protest him for being a 'racist' (THEY say).
BLM thugs went to this man's house, trespassed onto his property, surrounded his house, & threatened him and his home.
On his own property, in fear of his life / property, with the police not responding / being there, he stood his ground on his own property with a legally owned weapon, showing the criminal mob he would protect his home on his property if needed.
Despite the BLM thugs illegally being on his property, Despite the BLM thugs threatening him and his property, despite the reported existence of laws allowing the homeowner to protect himself and his property, The HOMEOWNER was arrested and removed from his property. The police did NOT remove the BLM thugs who were on the man's property ILLEGALLY.
The homeowner then had to endure being arrested on his own property while being mocked by BLM criminal thugs who were there on his property illegally and who were NOT being removed from his property for trespassing....
The homeowner has now had his legally owned firearm confiscated, I am sure, like the McCloskey's, the authorities will go through his home and confiscate all of his legally owned firearms, and he is being charged with at least 1 crime....for defending his life and home from foreign-funded criminal Domestic Terrorists.
The message is being sent loud and clear:
You may have the right to own a gun, but liberals are denying you the right to use that weapon on your own property to defend yourself, your family, and your home against radical leftist extremist criminals who are on your property illegal, threatening you, your loved pones, and your homes! Hell yeah, we're coming for your guns!
BREAKING: Milwaukee Trump Supporter Arrested for Brandishing a Gun at Black Lives Matter Mob That Was Surrounding His Home (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald
A Milwaukee man has reportedly been arrested after pulling a gun on a mob of Black Lives Matter supporters who were surrounding his home for several hours.
In this case I could go along with restraint , not shooting anyone unless absolutely necessary; however, stepping outside of your own home and showing the criminal mob on your property that you have a weapon (signifying you are willing to use it) should NOT be illegal.
Making it illegal to be outside of your own house, on your own property, while holding a legally purchased / owned firearm should NOT be illegal.
Except, yes, actually.Except not really.
The Gateway Pundit - Bias and Credibility
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or nomediabiasfactcheck.com
The Gateway Pundit Bias and Reliability | Ad Fontes Media
Ad Fontes Media rates The Gateway Pundit, a site founded “to expose the wickedness of the left,” as hyper-partisan right in terms of bias and unreliable ...www.adfontesmedia.com
By an Hispanic COP named Jeronimo Yanez, which I find funny how no negro I know, even knows the name JERONIMO YANEZ.At least they didn't get shot and killed over their legal guns like Philando Castile.
By an Hispanic COP named Jeronimo Yanez, which I find funny how no negro I know, even knows the name JERONIMO YANEZ.At least they didn't get shot and killed over their legal guns like Philando Castile.
Certainly didn't HYPE that name.
Ahhhh, but George Zimmerman? While Hispanic, that name SOUNDS WHITE. So naturally the media HYPED THAT NAME.
But...
Jeronimo Yanez? No, they mention it here or there. Not hyped. They hype the word COP which to the left and their negro slaves, is synonymous with WHITE TRUMP VOTERS.
Have to stand in awe. It's a war folks.
It's not illegal. Demoskank criminals are violating civil rights and the law. past time to stop those sob's.Should have been shot.The trespasser were charged .View attachment 389300
...and it has happened again:
BREAKING: Milwaukee Trump Supporter
Arrested for Brandishing a Gun at Black Lives
Matter Mob That Was Surrounding His Home
We are continuing to see Americans under liberal leadership / control will NOT be allowed to protect themselves. on their own property with their own legally purchased / owned firearms.
Mark and Patricia McCloskey were the 1st 2 Americans targeted for defending their lives and homes from a violent BLM mob who have broken through their community gate, trespasses, and threatened them and their home. For defending their home their home was raided, all legally-owned firearms were seized, and they have been charged with FELONIES for standing their ground and protecting their lives....in a state that has the 'Stand Your Ground' and allows CCP carry of legally owned weapons.
Once again, a BLM mob trespassed on the private property of a Trump Supporter and was surrounding his home...on HIS property. It was reported the homeowner was arrested for protecting himself and his property, and HE - and only he -was removed from HIS property. As the police arrested him the mob - on HIS property - mocked and harassed HIM.
On social media members of the mob claimed they were justified in trespassing on his property, justified in harassing and threatening him, and HIS being arrested for brandishing a weapon in the defense of himself and his home, which they had surrounded, was justified because HE IS A 'RACIST' AND 'HE HAS A CONFEDERATE FLAG'.
The police say the BLM mob went to his house intentionally to protest him for being a 'racist' (THEY say).
BLM thugs went to this man's house, trespassed onto his property, surrounded his house, & threatened him and his home.
On his own property, in fear of his life / property, with the police not responding / being there, he stood his ground on his own property with a legally owned weapon, showing the criminal mob he would protect his home on his property if needed.
Despite the BLM thugs illegally being on his property, Despite the BLM thugs threatening him and his property, despite the reported existence of laws allowing the homeowner to protect himself and his property, The HOMEOWNER was arrested and removed from his property. The police did NOT remove the BLM thugs who were on the man's property ILLEGALLY.
The homeowner then had to endure being arrested on his own property while being mocked by BLM criminal thugs who were there on his property illegally and who were NOT being removed from his property for trespassing....
The homeowner has now had his legally owned firearm confiscated, I am sure, like the McCloskey's, the authorities will go through his home and confiscate all of his legally owned firearms, and he is being charged with at least 1 crime....for defending his life and home from foreign-funded criminal Domestic Terrorists.
The message is being sent loud and clear:
You may have the right to own a gun, but liberals are denying you the right to use that weapon on your own property to defend yourself, your family, and your home against radical leftist extremist criminals who are on your property illegal, threatening you, your loved pones, and your homes! Hell yeah, we're coming for your guns!
BREAKING: Milwaukee Trump Supporter Arrested for Brandishing a Gun at Black Lives Matter Mob That Was Surrounding His Home (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Cassandra MacDonald
A Milwaukee man has reportedly been arrested after pulling a gun on a mob of Black Lives Matter supporters who were surrounding his home for several hours.
In this case I could go along with restraint , not shooting anyone unless absolutely necessary; however, stepping outside of your own home and showing the criminal mob on your property that you have a weapon (signifying you are willing to use it) should NOT be illegal.
Making it illegal to be outside of your own house, on your own property, while holding a legally purchased / owned firearm should NOT be illegal.
