Why do they fall for it so willingly?

[berg80]

There's a good fellow. Apparently you stutter when you cut and paste.

You still have not even attempted to refute any of the factual info I've presented. I know why.

Yes or no. Mueller stated in his report that he declined to prosecute Donnie J for the crime he committed because of Jr's ignorance of the law he broke?

"The Office considered whether this evidence would establish a conspiracy to violate the foreign contributions ban . . . solicitation of an illegal foreign-source contribution; or the acceptance or receipt of “an express or implied promise to make a [foreign-source] contribution” . . . There are reasonable arguments that the offered information would constitute a “thing of value” within the meaning of these provisions, but the Office determined that the government would not be likely to obtain and sustain a conviction for two other reasons: first, the Office did not obtain admissible evidence likely to meet the government’s burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that these individuals acted “willfully,” i.e. with general knowledge of the illegality of their conduct....."

Generally speaking, ignorance of the law is not considered a viable offense. But then Mueller is a Repub.

In the United States, there is a general legal principle that ignorance of the law is not an excuse. Citizens must understand the laws of the United States and act per them. Laws are published and made clear by the United States government. And so, ignorance cannot be used as a defense.

Is Ignorance Of The Law a Defense?

Is it still illegal if you didn’t know it was a crime? Nick Lotito & Seth Kirschenbaum explain in a new blog:

www.atlanta-criminal-law.com

 

[Hollie]

You still have not even attempted to refute any of the factual info I've presented. I know why.

You have not attempted to do anything but cut and paste multiple instances of the same tired, debunked, conspiracy theory drivel that you need to support your Russia collusion fetish.

 

[berg80]

You have not attempted to do anything but cut and paste multiple instances of the same tired, debunked, conspiracy theory drivel that you need to support your Russia collusion fetish.

Yes or no. Mueller stated in his report that he declined to prosecute Donnie J for the crime he committed because of Jr's ignorance of the law he broke?

"The Office considered whether this evidence would establish a conspiracy to violate the foreign contributions ban . . . solicitation of an illegal foreign-source contribution; or the acceptance or receipt of “an express or implied promise to make a [foreign-source] contribution” . . . There are reasonable arguments that the offered information would constitute a “thing of value” within the meaning of these provisions, but the Office determined that the government would not be likely to obtain and sustain a conviction for two other reasons: first, the Office did not obtain admissible evidence likely to meet the government’s burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that these individuals acted “willfully,” i.e. with general knowledge of the illegality of their conduct....."

Generally speaking, ignorance of the law is not considered a viable offense. But then Mueller is a Repub.

In the United States, there is a general legal principle that ignorance of the law is not an excuse. Citizens must understand the laws of the United States and act per them. Laws are published and made clear by the United States government. And so, ignorance cannot be used as a defense.

Is Ignorance Of The Law a Defense?​

Is it still illegal if you didn’t know it was a crime? Nick Lotito & Seth Kirschenbaum explain in a new blog:
www.atlanta-criminal-law.com

 

[Hollie]

Yes or no. Mueller stated in his report that he declined to prosecute Donnie J for the crime he committed because of Jr's ignorance of the law he broke?

"The Office considered whether this evidence would establish a conspiracy to violate the foreign contributions ban . . . solicitation of an illegal foreign-source contribution; or the acceptance or receipt of “an express or implied promise to make a [foreign-source] contribution” . . . There are reasonable arguments that the offered information would constitute a “thing of value” within the meaning of these provisions, but the Office determined that the government would not be likely to obtain and sustain a conviction for two other reasons: first, the Office did not obtain admissible evidence likely to meet the government’s burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that these individuals acted “willfully,” i.e. with general knowledge of the illegality of their conduct....."

Generally speaking, ignorance of the law is not considered a viable offense. But then Mueller is a Repub.

In the United States, there is a general legal principle that ignorance of the law is not an excuse. Citizens must understand the laws of the United States and act per them. Laws are published and made clear by the United States government. And so, ignorance cannot be used as a defense.

Is Ignorance Of The Law a Defense?​

Is it still illegal if you didn’t know it was a crime? Nick Lotito & Seth Kirschenbaum explain in a new blog:
www.atlanta-criminal-law.com

Russia collusion forever.

Some folks just live and breathe their conspiracy theories.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

This illustrates why those suffering from TDS are willfully ignorant. They promote lies and conspiracy theories about terrorist attacks and an insurrection™ which they see on the Joy Reid show. They sit wide-eyed and in a stupor.

In addition, Trump supporters are stupid and dishonest.

 

[Hollie]

In addition, Trump supporters are stupid and dishonest.

11 year olds are embarrassed at your juvenile banter.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

When you don’t have Covid, this is what you do.

Willful ignorance, stupidity, dishonesty all contribute to the Cult of Trump.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

11 year olds are embarrassed at your juvenile banter.

Trump supporters have divorced themselves from facts and the truth; indeed, they have contempt for both.

 

[Hollie]

Trump supporters have divorced themselves from facts and the truth; indeed, they have contempt for both.

Your silly tirades are standard fare for the leftist, self-loathing types.

 

[berg80]

Russia collusion forever.

Some folks just live and breathe their conspiracy theories.

This is from Mueller's report in reference to the Trump Tower meeting Donnie J went to with the expectation he would be given dirt on Hillary from the Russian government. Do you understand what it means?

"The Office considered whether this evidence would establish a conspiracy to violate the foreign contributions ban . . . solicitation of an illegal foreign-source contribution; or the acceptance or receipt of “an express or implied promise to make a [foreign-source] contribution” . . . There are reasonable arguments that the offered information would constitute a “thing of value” within the meaning of these provisions, but the Office determined that the government would not be likely to obtain and sustain a conviction for two other reasons: first, the Office did not obtain admissible evidence likely to meet the government’s burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that these individuals acted “willfully,” i.e. with general knowledge of the illegality of their conduct....."

 

[berg80]

Trump supporters have divorced themselves from facts and the truth; indeed, they have contempt for both.

They have a choice. Accept the facts or cling to the dishonest narratives that are part of Trump's con. Obviously they have chosen the latter.

 

[Hollie]

This is from Mueller's report in reference to the Trump Tower meeting Donnie J went to with the expectation he would be given dirt on Hillary from the Russian government. Do you understand what it means?

"The Office considered whether this evidence would establish a conspiracy to violate the foreign contributions ban . . . solicitation of an illegal foreign-source contribution; or the acceptance or receipt of “an express or implied promise to make a [foreign-source] contribution” . . . There are reasonable arguments that the offered information would constitute a “thing of value” within the meaning of these provisions, but the Office determined that the government would not be likely to obtain and sustain a conviction for two other reasons: first, the Office did not obtain admissible evidence likely to meet the government’s burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that these individuals acted “willfully,” i.e. with general knowledge of the illegality of their conduct....."

Russia collusion.

It's a syndrome that afflicts the Trump groupies.

 

[berg80]

Russia collusion.

It's a syndrome that afflicts the Trump groupies.

Do you understand what it means?

"The Office considered whether this evidence would establish a conspiracy to violate the foreign contributions ban . . . solicitation of an illegal foreign-source contribution; or the acceptance or receipt of “an express or implied promise to make a [foreign-source] contribution” . . . There are reasonable arguments that the offered information would constitute a “thing of value” within the meaning of these provisions, but the Office determined that the government would not be likely to obtain and sustain a conviction for two other reasons: first, the Office did not obtain admissible evidence likely to meet the government’s burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that these individuals acted “willfully,” i.e. with general knowledge of the illegality of their conduct....."

 

[Hollie]

Do you understand what it means?

"The Office considered whether this evidence would establish a conspiracy to violate the foreign contributions ban . . . solicitation of an illegal foreign-source contribution; or the acceptance or receipt of “an express or implied promise to make a [foreign-source] contribution” . . . There are reasonable arguments that the offered information would constitute a “thing of value” within the meaning of these provisions, but the Office determined that the government would not be likely to obtain and sustain a conviction for two other reasons: first, the Office did not obtain admissible evidence likely to meet the government’s burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that these individuals acted “willfully,” i.e. with general knowledge of the illegality of their conduct....."

Fascinating. Hoping you will cut and paste the entirety of the Russia collusion hoax... maybe in red, bolded text for that added sense of melodrama.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Fascinating. Hoping you will cut and paste the entirety of the Russia collusion hoax... maybe in red, bolded text for that added sense of melodrama.

We get it. You don't care that the russians helped your orange god as he requested. Because you want them to help him.

And you don't care that he attempted to pay them back. Because cult.

There is nothing new under the sun here in your posts.

 

[Hollie]

We get it. You don't care that the russians helped your orange god as he requested. Because you want them to help him.

And you don't care that he attempted to pay them back. Because cult.

There is nothing new under the sun here in your posts.

We get it. You Trump Cultists need your conspiracy theories.

 

[berg80]

Fascinating. Hoping you will cut and paste the entirety of the Russia collusion hoax... maybe in red, bolded text for that added sense of melodrama.

Since you are unwilling to consider, or too stupid to understand, what the passage from Mueller's report means I'll spoon feed it to you like you're an infant. Which is what you are on an intellectual level.

Mueller's questionable, seemingly inconsequential decision not to charge Donnie J for engaging in "a conspiracy to violate the foreign contributions ban . . . solicitation of an illegal foreign-source contribution; or the acceptance or receipt of “an express or implied promise to make a [foreign-source] contribution” due to ignorance of the law is the only thing that prevented Mueller from concluding the Trump campaign illegally conspired with Russia. An act meeting the requirement to make a charge on the existence of a conspiracy occurred but Mueller declined to file the charge. Because Donnie J had been told the information he sought on Hillary was coming from the Russian government.

Take a second and think about what the right wing media (or your) reaction would have been if a Dem DoJ run investigation, authorized by a Dem acting AG, during a Dem administration, investigating a Dem prez, had a Dem Special Counsel conclude the prez's son is off the hook for the laws he broke due to ignorance of those laws.

Tell ya what, never mind. I already know what your reflexive, feeble, uninformed answer will be.

 

[j-mac]

Since you are unwilling to consider, or too stupid to understand, what the passage from Mueller's report means I'll spoon feed it to you like you're an infant. Which is what you are on an intellectual level.

Mueller's questionable, seemingly inconsequential decision not to charge Donnie J for engaging in "a conspiracy to violate the foreign contributions ban . . . solicitation of an illegal foreign-source contribution; or the acceptance or receipt of “an express or implied promise to make a [foreign-source] contribution” due to ignorance of the law is the only thing that prevented Mueller from concluding the Trump campaign illegally conspired with Russia. An act meeting the requirement to make a charge on the existence of a conspiracy occurred but Mueller declined to file the charge. Because Donnie J had been told the information he sought on Hillary was coming from the Russian government.

Take a second and think about what the right wing media (or your) reaction would have been if a Dem DoJ run investigation, authorized by a Dem acting AG, during a Dem administration, investigating a Dem prez, had a Dem Special Counsel conclude the prez's son is off the hook for the laws he broke due to ignorance of those laws.

Tell ya what, never mind. I already know what your reflexive, feeble, uninformed answer will be.

Boy, you guys want him jailed so bad, you can taste it.

The path you’ve taken this country over your obsession to destroy the nation, is not only sad, but downright vindictive.

That’ll make it so much more delicious when Trump prevails, and flushes this turd like it should be….

 

[Hollie]

Since you are unwilling to consider, or too stupid to understand, what the passage from Mueller's report means I'll spoon feed it to you like you're an infant. Which is what you are on an intellectual level.

Mueller's questionable, seemingly inconsequential decision not to charge Donnie J for engaging in "a conspiracy to violate the foreign contributions ban . . . solicitation of an illegal foreign-source contribution; or the acceptance or receipt of “an express or implied promise to make a [foreign-source] contribution” due to ignorance of the law is the only thing that prevented Mueller from concluding the Trump campaign illegally conspired with Russia. An act meeting the requirement to make a charge on the existence of a conspiracy occurred but Mueller declined to file the charge. Because Donnie J had been told the information he sought on Hillary was coming from the Russian government.

Take a second and think about what the right wing media (or your) reaction would have been if a Dem DoJ run investigation, authorized by a Dem acting AG, during a Dem administration, investigating a Dem prez, had a Dem Special Counsel conclude the prez's son is off the hook for the laws he broke due to ignorance of those laws.

Tell ya what, never mind. I already know what your reflexive, feeble, uninformed answer will be.

Oh, dear. Your tender sensibilities are damaged.

The politico-religious Jihad waged by the Dems / Socialists was just a waste of time.

All that cutting and pasting of what you believe is some vast conspiracy is just so much Dem / Socialist theater.

 

[Batcat]

trump sure talks about draining the swamp.

replacing the alligators with his own slimy in laws.

Trunp’s in laws are nowhere as “slimy” as Hunter Biden. Hunter really is slimy. Watch the videos on his laptop.

Hunter Biden’s laptop: What we can VERIFY

A laptop allegedly left at a shop by the president’s son has become the source of immense speculation. VERIFY dug into this controversial story.

www.wfaa.com

Marjorie Taylor Greene’s explicit visuals at Hunter Biden hearing draw rebuke​

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/marjorie-taylor-greene-hunter-biden-photos/