Would you like for your government to regulate prices, profits and wages?

I don't want stupid bureaucrats, whose bosses are corrupt dishonest politicians, elected by special interest groups, telling me how to run my life.
 
It wored well in Venezuela.
Winner, winner, chicken dinner!

Yes, indeed. I would be shocked if one liberal entered this thread to defend socialism, but you know they all want it.

All th winner countries have socailist aspects to them .
What exactly do you admire about socialism, Timmy?
In the US, socialism bailsout the wealthiest and lets them retain their multimillion dollar bonuses while on means tested corporate welfare, and enables the poor to have steak and lobster on their ebt cards.
 
How is it possible for a society based on capitalism to regulate "prices, profits and wages"? Are Bernie Sanders people hosting a poll?
 
It wored well in Venezuela.
Winner, winner, chicken dinner!

Yes, indeed. I would be shocked if one liberal entered this thread to defend socialism, but you know they all want it.

All th winner countries have socailist aspects to them .
What exactly do you admire about socialism, Timmy?

I think national education is a good thing . As well as health coverage . National parks . Highways . The internet . Airports . Energy producing dams . Fire and police departments , FEMA , I can go on and on.
 
It wored well in Venezuela.
Winner, winner, chicken dinner!

Yes, indeed. I would be shocked if one liberal entered this thread to defend socialism, but you know they all want it.

All th winner countries have socailist aspects to them .
What exactly do you admire about socialism, Timmy?

I think national education is a good thing . As well as health coverage . National parks . Highways . The internet . Airports . Energy producing dams . Fire and police departments , FEMA , I can go on and on.
So basically you believe the role of the government which is to do for the people what they can't do for themselves is socialism?

Excluding health insurance which is not heathcare of course.
 
It also worked and continues to work well in America and the rest of economically developed world. Where there are certainly specific examples of government regulating some prices, some profits and some wages.


Non-nutters understand that this not a question of absolutes, this is a question of balance between the engine of free market and framework of government regulation to ensure economy that runs fair, efficient and doesn't drive off the cliff.


HAHA there is always one that doesn't know shit about the facts to put out the talking point propaganda from the chairman.
 
It wored well in Venezuela.
Winner, winner, chicken dinner!

Yes, indeed. I would be shocked if one liberal entered this thread to defend socialism, but you know they all want it.

All th winner countries have socailist aspects to them .
What exactly do you admire about socialism, Timmy?

I think national education is a good thing . As well as health coverage . National parks . Highways . The internet . Airports . Energy producing dams . Fire and police departments , FEMA , I can go on and on.
So basically you believe the role of the government which is to do for the people what they can't do for themselves is socialism?

Excluding health insurance which is not heathcare of course.

No . I think gov should work for the benefit of the people . Not for just the benefit of big biz .

I think gov should reign in capitalism, so it doesn't destroy itself . I think gov and biz should work together to improve the lives of Americans.
 
Hell, I’d settle for a free market capitalist economic system, but we don’t have one of those and never really have had one; by design. We’ve have always had a blended economy to protect the interests of elites from the ravages of the market and to shift that burden onto the working class.

Privatized gains versus socialized losses for the Wall Street bankster class
Internalized profit versus externalized risk and expense for the “job creator” class
Socialism for the aristocracy versus laissez-faire capitalism for the masses
We should form a mob! Occupy, occupy, occupy... oh wait, that's already been done.
 
How is it possible for a society based on capitalism to regulate "prices, profits and wages"? Are Bernie Sanders people hosting a poll?
That's my point, it's not. A government that did that by definition would be communistic.
 
Winner, winner, chicken dinner!

Yes, indeed. I would be shocked if one liberal entered this thread to defend socialism, but you know they all want it.

All th winner countries have socailist aspects to them .
What exactly do you admire about socialism, Timmy?

I think national education is a good thing . As well as health coverage . National parks . Highways . The internet . Airports . Energy producing dams . Fire and police departments , FEMA , I can go on and on.
So basically you believe the role of the government which is to do for the people what they can't do for themselves is socialism?

Excluding health insurance which is not heathcare of course.

No . I think gov should work for the benefit of the people . Not for just the benefit of big biz .

I think gov should reign in capitalism, so it doesn't destroy itself . I think gov and biz should work together to improve the lives of Americans.
How exactly does government reign in capitalism?
 
Hell, I’d settle for a free market capitalist economic system, but we don’t have one of those and never really have had one; by design. We’ve have always had a blended economy to protect the interests of elites from the ravages of the market and to shift that burden onto the working class.

Privatized gains versus socialized losses for the Wall Street bankster class
Internalized profit versus externalized risk and expense for the “job creator” class
Socialism for the aristocracy versus laissez-faire capitalism for the masses
We should form a mob! Occupy, occupy, occupy... oh wait, that's already been done.

The mob was formed by your financial elites, quite successfully as it turns out.
 
All th winner countries have socailist aspects to them .
What exactly do you admire about socialism, Timmy?

I think national education is a good thing . As well as health coverage . National parks . Highways . The internet . Airports . Energy producing dams . Fire and police departments , FEMA , I can go on and on.
So basically you believe the role of the government which is to do for the people what they can't do for themselves is socialism?

Excluding health insurance which is not heathcare of course.

No . I think gov should work for the benefit of the people . Not for just the benefit of big biz .

I think gov should reign in capitalism, so it doesn't destroy itself . I think gov and biz should work together to improve the lives of Americans.
How exactly does government reign in capitalism?

See FDR. I'm not suggesting this approach now because that actually saved capitalism temporarilly. I say we allow our version of "capitalism" to run amok and just let it all play out this time.
 
We find it so irritating to read the rantings of pathetic little pukeleft scuzzies, shrieking for more and more transfer of wealth by the All-Powerful Central State from decent, clean, moral, hard-working, successful taxpayers to the loathsome parasite underclass elements. Let the blood-sucking, worthless leeches die or get out of our country. America for REAL Americans! Know what we mean?
 
We find it so irritating to read the rantings of pathetic little pukeleft scuzzies, shrieking for more and more transfer of wealth by the All-Powerful Central State from decent, clean, moral, hard-working, successful taxpayers to the loathsome parasite underclass elements. Let the blood-sucking, worthless leeches die or get out of our country. America for REAL Americans! Know what we mean?

There has indeed been a redistribution of societal wealth over the past half century, just not in the direction the ill informed are always blathering onward about.
 
All th winner countries have socailist aspects to them .
What exactly do you admire about socialism, Timmy?

I think national education is a good thing . As well as health coverage . National parks . Highways . The internet . Airports . Energy producing dams . Fire and police departments , FEMA , I can go on and on.
So basically you believe the role of the government which is to do for the people what they can't do for themselves is socialism?

Excluding health insurance which is not heathcare of course.

No . I think gov should work for the benefit of the people . Not for just the benefit of big biz .

I think gov should reign in capitalism, so it doesn't destroy itself . I think gov and biz should work together to improve the lives of Americans.
How exactly does government reign in capitalism?
with socialism.
 
We find it so irritating to read the rantings of pathetic little pukeleft scuzzies, shrieking for more and more transfer of wealth by the All-Powerful Central State from decent, clean, moral, hard-working, successful taxpayers to the loathsome parasite underclass elements. Let the blood-sucking, worthless leeches die or get out of our country. America for REAL Americans! Know what we mean?
did you know, that Mr. Trump and the poor; pay the taxes they are legally obligated to pay?

don't complain; be Patriotic.
 
What exactly do you admire about socialism, Timmy?

I think national education is a good thing . As well as health coverage . National parks . Highways . The internet . Airports . Energy producing dams . Fire and police departments , FEMA , I can go on and on.
So basically you believe the role of the government which is to do for the people what they can't do for themselves is socialism?

Excluding health insurance which is not heathcare of course.

No . I think gov should work for the benefit of the people . Not for just the benefit of big biz .

I think gov should reign in capitalism, so it doesn't destroy itself . I think gov and biz should work together to improve the lives of Americans.
How exactly does government reign in capitalism?
with socialism.

We've always had a blended economy, the trick has always been achieving the proper balance, and we are clearly out of balance here and now; a trajectory that began during the Reagan years, but has been utterly bipartisan in it's furthering.
 

Forum List

Back
Top