The5thHorseman
Platinum Member
- Nov 22, 2022
- 12,136
- 6,577
- 918
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #161
Because you assert so.No more corrupt than any demscum.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because you assert so.No more corrupt than any demscum.
My charter obliges me to operate under an ethical standard on which I've been thoroughly tested.
Any other dumbass questions?
That's what Thomas is saying because he thinks he's better then the rest of us.This bomb that ends up fizzling gets thrown by the desperate.
Keep your filthy claws away from SCOTUS, dear quisling!!
What do you know about it?Your protestations are nothing more than ejaculatory premature.
Keep a case of tissues nearby.![]()
Smear campaigns don't work on SC justices....Too bad for you.By demonstrating that he's bought and paid for?
That's what Thomas is saying because he thinks he's better then the rest of us.
Soooooo, go bow to your "better".
It's not a smear if they have the evidence.Smear campaigns don't work on SC justices....Too bad for you.
What do you know about it?
So, where's the evidence? Show us...It's not a smear if they have the evidence.
Try again.Even WashPo couldn't get their story accurate about Gorsuch's real estate dealings!!
I watch C-SPAN hearings and DO NOT trade in fake news like you sub-human invertebrates.
Do you read the Pro Publica article?So, where's the evidence? Show us...
RGB is not here to explain it so you can go take that hike that Clarence is telling you to do. Now due to Thomas' arrogance people are asking who else is he owned by, mouth breather.Apple's and oranges.
RBG took 58 trips on someone else's dime.
You would have known this if you watched C-SPAN.
C-SPAN is your friend, ass breath.
Try again.
that's not evidence of anything....Meanwhile...Do you read the Pro Publica article?
RGB is not here to explain it so you can go take that hike that Clarence is telling you to do. Now due to Thomas' arrogance people are asking who else is he owned by, mouth breather.
It's time for Garland to direct DOJ to do an investigation into Thomas.Clarence didn't say so.
It came out in the hearing 'under oath' on Tuesday.
It's time for Garland to direct DOJ to do an investigation into Thomas.
that's not evidence of anything....Meanwhile...
"
But Democrats remained quiet throughout the years when reports surfaced on Supreme Court justices concerning their potential conflicts, including proximity to Democratic mega-donors, omitting trips and reimbursements, failing to recuse themselves from cases involving companies in which they had financial stakes and cases concerning issues they had worked on in the past.
Retired Justice Stephen Breyer, who served on the high court from 1994 to 2022, had been identified as maintaining close ties to the wealthy Chicago-based Pritzker family.
OpenSecrets reported that from 2004 to 2018, Breyer took more trips than any other Supreme Court justice (219). The Pritzker family, known for their generous contributions to Democratic causes, supported many of the trips.
The billionaire relatives, mainly Democratic Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker and his sister Penny Pritzker, who formerly served as the secretary of commerce in the Obama administration, have funneled $23.3 million to Democratic committees over the past ten years, according to a Fox News Digital review of campaign finance records.
Breyer's Pritzker-backed trips included two related to his post as a juror for the Pritzker Prize for Architecture, which honors architects yearly, OpenSecrets reported. Breyer became a juror for the group in 2011 before becoming its chair in 2018."
![]()
Democrats attack conservative Supreme Court justices but have long ignored liberal justices' ethical issues
Democrats have targeted conservative Supreme Court Clarence Thomas over recent ethical concerns but have remained silent on potential liberal justices' issues in the past.www.foxnews.com
Seems I never saw you complaining about that....hmmmm
Sez who?that's not evidence of anything..
That didn't happen, so who gives a fuck?And what does it say about the implications of handing it directly to the kid?
Every member of Congress has got his head buried up Soros's ass.So now we have a SC justice with his head buried up some billionaire's ass. You condone that? Oh wait, don't answer that. You right wing mouth breather's support Trump & a few of his lackeys in Congress who do the same with Putin.