With The Latest Revelations About Clarence Thomas, What's The Over Under On "Weeks Until He Resigns in Disgrace"?

[AMart]

He hasn't sat on any cases regarding Crow. Sotomayor on the other hand has sat on cases involving her publisher, who paid her a 3 million advance on a book.

.

This

 

[bripat9643]

You want to protect the corrupt. Not surprising.

The Dims pursuing Thomas are the corrupt, douchebags. We all know this entire brouhaha is a fake scandal conjured up by the leftwing propaganda masters.

 

[Care4all]

This

She declared Random house paying her under contract for her own book.

so we were ALL AWARE of it


Unlike Justice Thomas, who hid all of his "GIFTS" from a Republican activist mega billionaire donor, over two decades. Thomas received strange and unusual mega GIFTS that were directly paid to him personally or his wife personally... not for a product, like a book he produced.

Random House never took Sotomeyer on luxurious vacations with one on one conversations on political positions expressed nor is Random House a mega Democratic donor with political stances or involvement.

In addition, there was no case, it was denied a SC court case, and you do NOT KNOW how she voted, which could have been a vote to hear it...

There is no comparison between the two...zip, nada, zilch.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Not wasting my time for the likes of you.

But we should waste ours trying to find it, right?

 

[Flash]

This funny.

Libtards and their pipe dreams about getting rid of the best Justice on the Supreme Court. LOL!

Libtards have tried to lynch the uppity Negro that refused to be a Democrat House Slave before and did not succeed.

To get rid of him he must be impeached. Good luck with that considering the House is Republican and the Senate half Republican.

 

[martybegan]

But we should waste ours trying to find it, right?

You are the SJW twat, your entire life is a waste.

 

[The5thHorseman]

The Dims pursuing Thomas are the corrupt, douchebags. We all know this entire brouhaha is a fake scandal conjured up by the leftwing propaganda masters.

How do "we" "know" this, bri?

 

[The5thHorseman]

This funny.

Libtards and their pipe dreams about getting rid of the best Justice on the Supreme Court. LOL!

Libtards have tried to lynch the uppity Negro that refused to be a Democrat House Slave before and did not succeed.

To get rid of him he must be impeached. Good luck with that considering the House is Republican and the Senate half Republican.

And the GOP has a well established tradition of coddling its criminals.

 

[Oddball]

How do "we" "know" this, bri?

Because it's a recurring pattern.....You really aren't 1/2 as bright as you try to play yourself off as, Peukema.

 

[Oddball]

And the GOP has a well established tradition of coddling its criminals.

You mean like all the urban GOP DAs, who keep letting criminals walk out of jail with no bail, so that they can keep committing more crimes?

Oh wait....

 

[Care4all]

My policy is no compromise with democrats and their phony morality police

So Thomas stays where he is and a curse on any repub that crosses the line

So you are for UNETHICAL and compromised supreme court justices if they are conservatives eh?

YOU and people like you, are the problem, in this country!

 

[Oddball]

Look at your avatar, asshole.

Pepe is a troll to gullible bedwetters like you, and you keep falling for it.

If you were 1/10th as savvy as you like to play yourself off as, you'd already know that, fucking sap.

 

[bripat9643]

She declared Random house paying her under contract for her own book.

so we were ALL AWARE of it


Unlike Justice Thomas, who hid all of his "GIFTS" from a Republican activist mega billionaire donor, over two decades. Thomas received strange and unusual mega GIFTS that were directly paid to him personally or his wife personally... not for a product, like a book he produced.

Random House never took Sotomeyer on luxurious vacations with one on one conversations on political positions expressed nor is Random House a mega Democratic donor with political stances or involvement.

In addition, there was no case, it was denied a SC court case, and you do NOT KNOW how she voted, which could have been a vote to hear it...

There is no comparison between the two...zip, nada, zilch.

She didn't recuse herself, dingbat.

 

[Flash]

And the GOP has a well established tradition of coddling its criminals.

The biggest crime syndicate in the world now is the Biden family. They sold out America to become filthy rich from their Chinese, Russian and Ukraine sweetheart deals.

Then you have the Clinton assholes. Slick Willy and Crooked Hillary got filthy rich selling government influence and then laundering the money through a scam foundation.

Democrats are the scum of America.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Because it's a recurring pattern.....You really aren't 1/2 as bright as you try to play yourself off as, Peukema.

Link?

You and bri are every bit as dim as you fear.

Ask around the Badlands.

They can explain that I am not JBeukema...

 

[EMH]

And the GOP has a well established tradition of coddling its criminals.

The hypocrisy here is off the scale.


The LEFT believes Blacks do not have the right to disagree with the Dem Party.

That belief is the pinnacle of racism.

The obsession with Clarence Thomas stems from that racism.

The most racist incidents at the Thomas confirmation hearings were from

Justice Clarence Thomas rebukes Biden-led confirmation hearings in new film

Justice Clarence Thomas criticizes former Sen. Joe Biden's handling of the 1991 Supreme Court confirmation hearings that have been an issue in the 2020 campaign.

abcnews.go.com

Joe Biden was an arrogant smirky white supremacist at those hearings... which helps to explain why Joe Biden voted FOUR TIMES for


Ku Klux Klan Enchanted Cyclops Robert "KKKing of Pork" Byrd to be DEM Senate leader

 

[The5thHorseman]

Pepe is a troll to gullible bedwetters like you, and you keep falling for it.

If you were 1/10th as savvy as you like to play yourself off as, you'd already know that, fucking sap.

Sure....

There was a "patriot" on another forum whose avatar sported an SS hat...took him a while to admit his real reason.

He changed it.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Don't labor IQ, Mike...You're much too vulnerable.

How do you "labor IQ"?

 

[Care4all]

She didn't recuse herself, dingbat.

For what?

 

[Oddball]

Sure....

There was a "patriot" on another forum whose avatar sported an SS hat...took him a while to admit his real reason.

He changed it.

So one dude is everyone....Over generalize much?

Yup, you really are far less sharp than you want everyone to think that you are.