Wisconsin Supreme Court to Trump: Uh, No!

[DrLove]

Judge Alito agreed to hear the case.

Then why is SCOTUS hearing the case?

So far they have not agreed to do so

There are other cases in areas that fall under different Justices. Enough similar cases will likely tip the balance.

The only balance that's gonna get tipped is that of the Tangerine Tornado when he is tossed out on his ear.

 

[Indeependent]

Perhaps the Blob aka Stacey Adams will become President.

 

[Juicin]

The WI SC refused to hear Trump's case.

View attachment 424671



It won't stop them from filing more frivolous lawsuits though.

That's just more justification for the legislature to do something.../

How do you see this as a win?

The goal is to mollify the Republican legislatures and give them an out not win worthless legal battles you buffoon. This does the opposite

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

They will because the States broke the Federal Laws regarding the Ballot dates.

There is no federal law on ballot dates.

You understand that legal precedent is controlling in this situation, right?

The Supreme Court has subject-matter jurisdiction to review state court rulings when they touch on federal issues, or when they concern U.S. Constitutional rights.

To law school with you.

Few if any of these cases touch on federal issues or US constitutional rights.

Attempts to make these federal issues have failed spectacularly. Giuliani got slapped around by the trial judge in PA. Then he got slapped around at the appellate level a week ago and immediately said he’d appeal to SCOTUS.

He hasn’t.

Mark Kelly lost his appeal at the PA Supreme Court and has appealed to SCOTUS. The problem is the matter has zero to do with federal law. It has everything to do with whether a PA state law is against the PA constitution. You know who doesn’t decide whether a state law is against the state constitution?

so I guess Bush v. Gore never happened then, correct?


See, this is why you need to go back to law school.

The United States Supreme Court reviews matters dealing with state laws all the ******* time, because they usually touch on federal issues, like the US motherfucking constitution, specifically in this case, the right to vote, and how we select presidents, senators, and representatives.

Perhaps you don't realize how much the 14th amendment and other precedent has changed our entire system.

You are a dumb **** when it comes to law. You should shut the **** up.

What happened in Bush v Gore? Let’s review because it doesn’t help you at all.

The Florida SC had a certified election result but ordered a manual recount of all counties in Florida. SCOTUS determined that the recount would not get results before the safe harbor provision at which time all legal disputes are to be settled. The safe harbor law is federal which makes it a federal issue.

The safe harbor date is Tuesday, by the way. So going by Bush v Gore (which also isn’t precedent) you guys have four days to do something.

I just.....there are no words.....

Indeependent is such a masterful debater (not a necessarily masterbater) that he got YOU to make his case for him.

Damn.

I am in awe....

 

[colfax_m]

They will because the States broke the Federal Laws regarding the Ballot dates.

There is no federal law on ballot dates.

You understand that legal precedent is controlling in this situation, right?

The Supreme Court has subject-matter jurisdiction to review state court rulings when they touch on federal issues, or when they concern U.S. Constitutional rights.

To law school with you.

Few if any of these cases touch on federal issues or US constitutional rights.

Attempts to make these federal issues have failed spectacularly. Giuliani got slapped around by the trial judge in PA. Then he got slapped around at the appellate level a week ago and immediately said he’d appeal to SCOTUS.

He hasn’t.

Mark Kelly lost his appeal at the PA Supreme Court and has appealed to SCOTUS. The problem is the matter has zero to do with federal law. It has everything to do with whether a PA state law is against the PA constitution. You know who doesn’t decide whether a state law is against the state constitution?

so I guess Bush v. Gore never happened then, correct?


See, this is why you need to go back to law school.

The United States Supreme Court reviews matters dealing with state laws all the ******* time, because they usually touch on federal issues, like the US motherfucking constitution, specifically in this case, the right to vote, and how we select presidents, senators, and representatives.

Perhaps you don't realize how much the 14th amendment and other precedent has changed our entire system.

You are a dumb **** when it comes to law. You should shut the **** up.

What happened in Bush v Gore? Let’s review because it doesn’t help you at all.

The Florida SC had a certified election result but ordered a manual recount of all counties in Florida. SCOTUS determined that the recount would not get results before the safe harbor provision at which time all legal disputes are to be settled. The safe harbor law is federal which makes it a federal issue.

The safe harbor date is Tuesday, by the way. So going by Bush v Gore (which also isn’t precedent) you guys have four days to do something.

I just.....there are no words.....

Indeependent is such a masterful debater (not a necessarily masterbater) that he got YOU to make his case for him.

Damn.

I am in awe....

Seriously. You guys are almost out of time. Tuesday will be here before you know it.

Maybe you can help proofread the Kraken?

 

[Billiejeens]

Wisconsin Supreme Court to Trump: Uh, No!

Real world -

Wisc. Supreme Court says - let it go through the District Court - then it would get appealed here -

(like it always works)

 

[meaner gene]

The safe harbor date is Tuesday, by the way. So going by Bush v Gore (which also isn’t precedent) you guys have four days to do something.

The other problem is that enough states have already certified to give Biden a victory. And their plan to have state legislatures chose the electors suffers from the same problem as when Florida sent two sets of electors in the 1800's.

We have a divided congress, which means no electors can be thrown out, and the winner is determined by having a majority of electors appointed. So if an extra 44 Trump electors are sent, bringing Trump to 276 electors representing Trump, that also pushes the number of electors needed to win from 270 to 292.

 

[colfax_m]

The safe harbor date is Tuesday, by the way. So going by Bush v Gore (which also isn’t precedent) you guys have four days to do something.

The other problem is that enough states have already certified to give Biden a victory. And their plan to have state legislatures chose the electors suffers from the same problem as when Florida sent two sets of electors in the 1800's.

We have a divided congress, which means no electors can be thrown out, and the winner is determined by having a majority of electors appointed. So if an extra 44 Trump electors are sent, bringing Trump to 276 electors representing Trump, that also pushes the number of electors needed to win from 270 to 292.

Fascinating. Thanks!

 

[Christ_on_a_croissant]

The WI SC refused to hear Trump's case.

View attachment 424671



It won't stop them from filing more frivolous lawsuits though.

Good.

Fast-tract that ***** right to the SCOTUS.

SCOTUS won’t touch this

 

[meaner gene]

Wisconsin Supreme Court to Trump: Uh, No!

Real world -

Wisc. Supreme Court says - let it go through the District Court - then it would get appealed here -

(like it always works)

Oh snap. You know what that means?
The supreme court can only take cases that have reached the highest level they can within the state.
If their supreme court says, they'll take it later, it means it can't be appealed to the USSC until it goes through them first.

Had they instead made a final ruling on the case, the plaintiffs could appeal that ruling.

 

[meaner gene]

Good.

Fast-tract that ***** right to the SCOTUS.

SCOTUS won’t touch this

The SCOTUS can't touch it, until the state supreme court gets it back on appeal.

And the state supreme court send it back to the lower level to run out the clock.

 

[Toro]

BOOM!!

And again!

That's 1-42, cultists!