Wisconsin Supreme Court to Trump: Uh, No!

[Lesh]

Trump is on a losing streak.

You wish.

Huh?

What is he...1 for 40...and that 1 was allowing poll watchers to stand closer?

winning....sheesh

Give it up.

Loss after loss and his cultists get crazier and crazier

 

[Lesh]

The WI SC refused to hear Trump's case.

View attachment 424671



It won't stop them from filing more frivolous lawsuits though.

Good.

Fast-tract that ***** right to the SCOTUS.

Clearly you’re ignorant of the American judicial system.

Clearly you’re ignorant of the American judicial system.
Judge Alito agreed to hear the case.

GOP lawmakers ask SCOTUS to block final certification of PA votes count

A complaint filed on Thursday argues that expanded absentee voting procedures violate the state’s constitution.

www.foxnews.com

Alito isn't the arbiter of that.

 

[Rogue AI]

The WI SC refused to hear Trump's case.

View attachment 424671



It won't stop them from filing more frivolous lawsuits though.

Good.

Fast-tract that ***** right to the SCOTUS.

Clearly you’re ignorant of the American judicial system.

Clearly you’re ignorant of the American judicial system.
Judge Alito agreed to hear the case.

GOP lawmakers ask SCOTUS to block final certification of PA votes count

A complaint filed on Thursday argues that expanded absentee voting procedures violate the state’s constitution.

www.foxnews.com

Alito isn't the arbiter of that.

He covers PA, so in that regard he is. He need only convince other Justices to take the case.

 

[Lesh]

A. The Ballots have already been "segregated"

B. There aren't enough to overturn the result if they are ALL for Biden...which they aren't

C. Biden wins WITHOUT PA.

 

[Rogue AI]

A. The Ballots have already been "segregated"

B. There aren't enough to overturn the result if they are ALL for Biden...which they aren't

C. Biden wins WITHOUT PA.

PA legislators aren't there for segregated ballots. Separate issues.

 

[Indeependent]

The WI SC refused to hear Trump's case.

View attachment 424671



It won't stop them from filing more frivolous lawsuits though.

Good.

Fast-tract that ***** right to the SCOTUS.

Clearly you’re ignorant of the American judicial system.

Clearly you’re ignorant of the American judicial system.
Judge Alito agreed to hear the case.

GOP lawmakers ask SCOTUS to block final certification of PA votes count

A complaint filed on Thursday argues that expanded absentee voting procedures violate the state’s constitution.

www.foxnews.com

Alito isn't the arbiter of that.

Oh, boy!
Another one who doesn't visit different sites to learn about the process.
When an appeal is lacking, one justice can force the rest to hear the case.
If four then agree to proceed, SCOTUS hears the case.

 

[Skylar]

The WI SC refused to hear Trump's case.

View attachment 424671



It won't stop them from filing more frivolous lawsuits though.

Good.

Fast-tract that ***** right to the SCOTUS.

Still don't understand the process?
Well, let me boil it down for you.
The SC never hears any case concerning the election.

Incorrect as the Hippie explained and you didn’t watch due to your 0 second attention span.

Is this where you try to get people to watch your rambling conspiracy theory videos on youtube again?

 

[Indeependent]

The WI SC refused to hear Trump's case.

View attachment 424671



It won't stop them from filing more frivolous lawsuits though.

Good.

Fast-tract that ***** right to the SCOTUS.

Still don't understand the process?
Well, let me boil it down for you.
The SC never hears any case concerning the election.

Incorrect as the Hippie explained and you didn’t watch due to your 0 second attention span.

Is this where you try to get people to watch your rambling conspiracy theory videos on youtube again?

A fact is a conspiracy?
Do you believe that if it's not on CNN it's a conspiracy.

 

[Skylar]

The WI SC refused to hear Trump's case.

View attachment 424671



It won't stop them from filing more frivolous lawsuits though.

Good.

Fast-tract that ***** right to the SCOTUS.

Still don't understand the process?
Well, let me boil it down for you.
The SC never hears any case concerning the election.

Incorrect as the Hippie explained and you didn’t watch due to your 0 second attention span.

Is this where you try to get people to watch your rambling conspiracy theory videos on youtube again?

A fact is a conspiracy?
Do you believe that if it's not on CNN it's a conspiracy.

A rambling conspiracy video on youtube is not a fact.

 

[Indeependent]

The WI SC refused to hear Trump's case.

View attachment 424671



It won't stop them from filing more frivolous lawsuits though.

Good.

Fast-tract that ***** right to the SCOTUS.

Still don't understand the process?
Well, let me boil it down for you.
The SC never hears any case concerning the election.

Incorrect as the Hippie explained and you didn’t watch due to your 0 second attention span.

Is this where you try to get people to watch your rambling conspiracy theory videos on youtube again?

A fact is a conspiracy?
Do you believe that if it's not on CNN it's a conspiracy.

A rambling conspiracy video on youtube is not a fact.

Then why is SCOTUS hearing the case?

 

[The Original Tree]

Trump is on a losing streak.

You wish.

Huh?

What is he...1 for 40...and that 1 was allowing poll watchers to stand closer?

winning....sheesh

Give it up.

Loss after loss and his cultists get crazier and crazier

That is a lie btw. There have only been three cases filed by The Trump Administration so take that and show it up your KKK Marxist Mask

 

[Rogue AI]

The WI case has since been consolidated and will be heard in Racine.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Good.

Fast-tract that ***** right to the SCOTUS.

That's the state court, Einstein.

You don't know what the **** you're talking about, dumbass. You need to go back to law school.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

All you internet night-school lawyers need to go back to law school. Jesus.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The WI SC refused to hear Trump's case.

View attachment 424671



It won't stop them from filing more frivolous lawsuits though.

Good.

Fast-tract that ***** right to the SCOTUS.

Still don't understand the process?
Well, let me boil it down for you.
The SC never hears any case concerning the election.

Not even Bush v. Gore, right?

 

[Lesh]

Judge Alito agreed to hear the case.

Then why is SCOTUS hearing the case?

So far they have not agreed to do so

 

[Rogue AI]

Judge Alito agreed to hear the case.

Then why is SCOTUS hearing the case?

So far they have not agreed to do so

There are other cases in areas that fall under different Justices. Enough similar cases will likely tip the balance.

 

[AceRothstein]

A. The Ballots have already been "segregated"

B. There aren't enough to overturn the result if they are ALL for Biden...which they aren't

C. Biden wins WITHOUT PA.

PA legislators aren't there for segregated ballots. Separate issues.

PA legislators aren't there at all now. They are out of session until next year.

 

[AceRothstein]

The WI SC refused to hear Trump's case.

View attachment 424671



It won't stop them from filing more frivolous lawsuits though.

Good.

Fast-tract that ***** right to the SCOTUS.

Still don't understand the process?
Well, let me boil it down for you.
The SC never hears any case concerning the election.

Incorrect as the Hippie explained and you didn’t watch due to your 0 second attention span.

Is this where you try to get people to watch your rambling conspiracy theory videos on youtube again?

A fact is a conspiracy?
Do you believe that if it's not on CNN it's a conspiracy.

A rambling conspiracy video on youtube is not a fact.

Then why is SCOTUS hearing the case?

They are? Link?

 

[Indeependent]

The WI SC refused to hear Trump's case.

View attachment 424671



It won't stop them from filing more frivolous lawsuits though.

Good.

Fast-tract that ***** right to the SCOTUS.

Still don't understand the process?
Well, let me boil it down for you.
The SC never hears any case concerning the election.

Incorrect as the Hippie explained and you didn’t watch due to your 0 second attention span.

Is this where you try to get people to watch your rambling conspiracy theory videos on youtube again?

A fact is a conspiracy?
Do you believe that if it's not on CNN it's a conspiracy.

A rambling conspiracy video on youtube is not a fact.

Then why is SCOTUS hearing the case?

They are? Link?

Fox, AP, Reuters
Take your head out of your ass.
Not on CNN or any of the overt Liberal Fake News sites.