Will Establishment Media Cover Biden as President?

[Indeependent]

Will Establishment Media Cover Biden as President?
They covered for him to get Trump out of office. Now will they actually start covering him with real reporting?​

Will Establishment Media Cover Biden as President? | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics
7 Dec 2020 ~~ By J.T. Young
Having created his presidency, how will establishment media cover President Biden? With the roles so different and so separated, it is easy to forget that establishment media have been instrumental throughout Biden’s three-decade-long presidential quest. In his first two campaigns, establishment media sank Biden by covering him; in his latest, they saved Biden by not covering him. Now with Biden elected, which role will they assume?
The first role establishment media played in Biden campaigns was aggressively direct.
In 1988, during his first campaign, they single-handedly destroyed Biden by revealing a pattern of plagiarism. Initially, revelations showed Biden had lifted portions from a speech by UK Labor politician Neil Kinnock. Then came more: “borrowings” from Hubert Humphrey and Robert Kennedy. Finally, they reported that Biden had failed a Syracuse University law course because he used five pages of a law-review publication without attribution.
~[snip]~
In contrast to their direct role in his first two presidential campaigns, establishment media’s role in Biden’s third presidential campaign has been indirect at best. Instead of essentially covering him to death, this time they effectively did not cover him at all.
In the 2020 campaign, establishment media did not force Biden into any mistakes or awkward encounters. When he blundered, they did not pursue. When they could have destroyed him, following disappointing Iowa and New Hampshire finishes, they held back.
Once Biden had secured the Democrat nomination, establishment media allowed him to retire from scrutiny for six months — despite him being the Democrat nominee and frontrunner. When he finally emerged after accepting formal nomination, they acquiesced to scripted encounters or being relegated to being observers. When encounters did occur, they were notably “soft.”
Now Biden is president-elect. In less than two months he will be president, making him the planet’s most newsworthy person. Will establishment media reestablish a direct role with Biden?
~[snip]~
Competition and demand will dictate coverage, even by establishment media. Coverage will open a window that Biden’s staff and establishment media effectively closed for the last 12 months. And exposure makes the public a participant: Establishment media’s coverage cannot long contradict what the public see.
Finally, it is unclear how much establishment media really care for Biden. They did not particularly in his first two campaigns. This time, his primary attraction for them has been his usefulness in purging Trump. Trump is now gone. Establishment media certainly will not like a continuation of his year-long, arm’s-length campaign treatment of them.
Having covered for Biden, establishment media will have to start covering him, whether they want to or not. It will be interesting to see how much better he fares as president than in his first two presidential campaigns.


Comment:
Surely the Quisling Media, Big Tech and Big Pharma have financed the election of China Joe Biden.
As J.T. Young points out, eventually the exposure to the media can't hide what the public actually sees.
Will the Lame Stream Media allow Biden and his administration arm's-length treatment of them to continue using the excuse of the Chinese Covid Virus excuse, or will they begin exposing Democrats in truthful reporting?

Yes, but not to the extent of coverage of DJT. It is unlikely Joe will be tweeting on the attack at 3 A.M. with the intent of entertaining his base or intentionally antagonizing people that did not vote for him. Nor will he be sticking up for old enemies, dictators and communists on the world stage overseas. Donnie invited the coverage he got, with his own dramatics and his administration personnel, likewise knew that he would look on it a valid support of his style of leadership (if you can call that) if they spoke out as pot stirrers also. B.O. wanted to be no drama Obama, though didn't always pull it off. Joe wants to be the "adults are back in office" president, and will attempt to show how it is supposed to be done, in a country that really needs to re-remember that we are all in this together and serious problems need serious low-key, low drama management style as the order of the day.

bull ! the media started attacking Trump and carried the russia collusion lie for 4yrs ! the msm didnt give the man credit for anything not even the peace deals between Israel and numerous arab countries or operation warop speed that has enabled a vaccine to be produced in record time [and will begin distribution in a few days !] and the economy that he presided over do to his cutting of taxes and regs and better trade deals and record unemployment until the the virus was unleashed by a country that the left or the msm refuse to place any blame whatsoever ! the msm has never been fair to the man ! and the fact that you believe or [claim to believe ] otherwise proves you are not a middle of the line independent !

Well Trump was urging his supporters to at least verbally harrass MSM media reporters at his campaign "events" in 16 HE based his entire candidacy on some sense of grievance against both the gop and dem establishments.

I've posted before that not ALL of his policies were fuck ups. But his personality made any compromise with opponents, or allies, impossible. When he was useful to Moscow Mitch or even Jina, they went along. When not, Trump was left alone with EO.

The gop congress won the 20 election and Trump lost. That wasn't the MSM's doing. People didn't like Trump's act.

Trump’s allies are, unlike yourself, pro-US.

 

[Nosmo King]

If, and that's a big 'if', Biden pulls a fraction of the destructive stuff Trump pulled or said or tweeted, the media boogeyman you mouth breathing Trumpians fear so much will call him out.

Big difference? Biden is a mature, responsible leader.

 

[22lcidw]

Will Establishment Media Cover Biden as President?
They covered for him to get Trump out of office. Now will they actually start covering him with real reporting?​

Will Establishment Media Cover Biden as President? | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics
7 Dec 2020 ~~ By J.T. Young
Having created his presidency, how will establishment media cover President Biden? With the roles so different and so separated, it is easy to forget that establishment media have been instrumental throughout Biden’s three-decade-long presidential quest. In his first two campaigns, establishment media sank Biden by covering him; in his latest, they saved Biden by not covering him. Now with Biden elected, which role will they assume?
The first role establishment media played in Biden campaigns was aggressively direct.
In 1988, during his first campaign, they single-handedly destroyed Biden by revealing a pattern of plagiarism. Initially, revelations showed Biden had lifted portions from a speech by UK Labor politician Neil Kinnock. Then came more: “borrowings” from Hubert Humphrey and Robert Kennedy. Finally, they reported that Biden had failed a Syracuse University law course because he used five pages of a law-review publication without attribution.
~[snip]~
In contrast to their direct role in his first two presidential campaigns, establishment media’s role in Biden’s third presidential campaign has been indirect at best. Instead of essentially covering him to death, this time they effectively did not cover him at all.
In the 2020 campaign, establishment media did not force Biden into any mistakes or awkward encounters. When he blundered, they did not pursue. When they could have destroyed him, following disappointing Iowa and New Hampshire finishes, they held back.
Once Biden had secured the Democrat nomination, establishment media allowed him to retire from scrutiny for six months — despite him being the Democrat nominee and frontrunner. When he finally emerged after accepting formal nomination, they acquiesced to scripted encounters or being relegated to being observers. When encounters did occur, they were notably “soft.”
Now Biden is president-elect. In less than two months he will be president, making him the planet’s most newsworthy person. Will establishment media reestablish a direct role with Biden?
~[snip]~
Competition and demand will dictate coverage, even by establishment media. Coverage will open a window that Biden’s staff and establishment media effectively closed for the last 12 months. And exposure makes the public a participant: Establishment media’s coverage cannot long contradict what the public see.
Finally, it is unclear how much establishment media really care for Biden. They did not particularly in his first two campaigns. This time, his primary attraction for them has been his usefulness in purging Trump. Trump is now gone. Establishment media certainly will not like a continuation of his year-long, arm’s-length campaign treatment of them.
Having covered for Biden, establishment media will have to start covering him, whether they want to or not. It will be interesting to see how much better he fares as president than in his first two presidential campaigns.


Comment:
Surely the Quisling Media, Big Tech and Big Pharma have financed the election of China Joe Biden.
As J.T. Young points out, eventually the exposure to the media can't hide what the public actually sees.
Will the Lame Stream Media allow Biden and his administration arm's-length treatment of them to continue using the excuse of the Chinese Covid Virus excuse, or will they begin exposing Democrats in truthful reporting?

Yes, but not to the extent of coverage of DJT. It is unlikely Joe will be tweeting on the attack at 3 A.M. with the intent of entertaining his base or intentionally antagonizing people that did not vote for him. Nor will he be sticking up for old enemies, dictators and communists on the world stage overseas. Donnie invited the coverage he got, with his own dramatics and his administration personnel, likewise knew that he would look on it a valid support of his style of leadership (if you can call that) if they spoke out as pot stirrers also. B.O. wanted to be no drama Obama, though didn't always pull it off. Joe wants to be the "adults are back in office" president, and will attempt to show how it is supposed to be done, in a country that really needs to re-remember that we are all in this together and serious problems need serious low-key, low drama management style as the order of the day.

bull ! the media started attacking Trump and carried the russia collusion lie for 4yrs ! the msm didnt give the man credit for anything not even the peace deals between Israel and numerous arab countries or operation warop speed that has enabled a vaccine to be produced in record time [and will begin distribution in a few days !] and the economy that he presided over do to his cutting of taxes and regs and better trade deals and record unemployment until the the virus was unleashed by a country that the left or the msm refuse to place any blame whatsoever ! the msm has never been fair to the man ! and the fact that you believe or [claim to believe ] otherwise proves you are not a middle of the line independent !

Well Trump was urging his supporters to at least verbally harrass MSM media reporters at his campaign "events." HE based his entire candidacy on some sense of grievance against both the gop and dem establishments.

I've posted before that not ALL of his policies were fuck ups. But his personality made any compromise with opponents, or allies, impossible. When he was useful to Moscow Mitch or even Jina, they went along. When not, Trump was left alone with EO.

The gop congress won the 20 election and Trump lost. That wasn't the MSM's doing. People didn't like Trump's act.

If he did it is because Deplorables are amateurs at this crap. And they are slowly learning the game. Trump's act was pre determined by the viciousness of the time from before his swearing in until 2020. The people in the media are protected. And in reality most are cowards. Talking the vile venom they do and living the life of riley and not even being in the trenches is the ultimate evil act.

 

[bendog]

Will Establishment Media Cover Biden as President?
They covered for him to get Trump out of office. Now will they actually start covering him with real reporting?​

Will Establishment Media Cover Biden as President? | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics
7 Dec 2020 ~~ By J.T. Young
Having created his presidency, how will establishment media cover President Biden? With the roles so different and so separated, it is easy to forget that establishment media have been instrumental throughout Biden’s three-decade-long presidential quest. In his first two campaigns, establishment media sank Biden by covering him; in his latest, they saved Biden by not covering him. Now with Biden elected, which role will they assume?
The first role establishment media played in Biden campaigns was aggressively direct.
In 1988, during his first campaign, they single-handedly destroyed Biden by revealing a pattern of plagiarism. Initially, revelations showed Biden had lifted portions from a speech by UK Labor politician Neil Kinnock. Then came more: “borrowings” from Hubert Humphrey and Robert Kennedy. Finally, they reported that Biden had failed a Syracuse University law course because he used five pages of a law-review publication without attribution.
~[snip]~
In contrast to their direct role in his first two presidential campaigns, establishment media’s role in Biden’s third presidential campaign has been indirect at best. Instead of essentially covering him to death, this time they effectively did not cover him at all.
In the 2020 campaign, establishment media did not force Biden into any mistakes or awkward encounters. When he blundered, they did not pursue. When they could have destroyed him, following disappointing Iowa and New Hampshire finishes, they held back.
Once Biden had secured the Democrat nomination, establishment media allowed him to retire from scrutiny for six months — despite him being the Democrat nominee and frontrunner. When he finally emerged after accepting formal nomination, they acquiesced to scripted encounters or being relegated to being observers. When encounters did occur, they were notably “soft.”
Now Biden is president-elect. In less than two months he will be president, making him the planet’s most newsworthy person. Will establishment media reestablish a direct role with Biden?
~[snip]~
Competition and demand will dictate coverage, even by establishment media. Coverage will open a window that Biden’s staff and establishment media effectively closed for the last 12 months. And exposure makes the public a participant: Establishment media’s coverage cannot long contradict what the public see.
Finally, it is unclear how much establishment media really care for Biden. They did not particularly in his first two campaigns. This time, his primary attraction for them has been his usefulness in purging Trump. Trump is now gone. Establishment media certainly will not like a continuation of his year-long, arm’s-length campaign treatment of them.
Having covered for Biden, establishment media will have to start covering him, whether they want to or not. It will be interesting to see how much better he fares as president than in his first two presidential campaigns.


Comment:
Surely the Quisling Media, Big Tech and Big Pharma have financed the election of China Joe Biden.
As J.T. Young points out, eventually the exposure to the media can't hide what the public actually sees.
Will the Lame Stream Media allow Biden and his administration arm's-length treatment of them to continue using the excuse of the Chinese Covid Virus excuse, or will they begin exposing Democrats in truthful reporting?

Yes, but not to the extent of coverage of DJT. It is unlikely Joe will be tweeting on the attack at 3 A.M. with the intent of entertaining his base or intentionally antagonizing people that did not vote for him. Nor will he be sticking up for old enemies, dictators and communists on the world stage overseas. Donnie invited the coverage he got, with his own dramatics and his administration personnel, likewise knew that he would look on it a valid support of his style of leadership (if you can call that) if they spoke out as pot stirrers also. B.O. wanted to be no drama Obama, though didn't always pull it off. Joe wants to be the "adults are back in office" president, and will attempt to show how it is supposed to be done, in a country that really needs to re-remember that we are all in this together and serious problems need serious low-key, low drama management style as the order of the day.

bull ! the media started attacking Trump and carried the russia collusion lie for 4yrs ! the msm didnt give the man credit for anything not even the peace deals between Israel and numerous arab countries or operation warop speed that has enabled a vaccine to be produced in record time [and will begin distribution in a few days !] and the economy that he presided over do to his cutting of taxes and regs and better trade deals and record unemployment until the the virus was unleashed by a country that the left or the msm refuse to place any blame whatsoever ! the msm has never been fair to the man ! and the fact that you believe or [claim to believe ] otherwise proves you are not a middle of the line independent !

Well Trump was urging his supporters to at least verbally harrass MSM media reporters at his campaign "events" in 16 HE based his entire candidacy on some sense of grievance against both the gop and dem establishments.

I've posted before that not ALL of his policies were fuck ups. But his personality made any compromise with opponents, or allies, impossible. When he was useful to Moscow Mitch or even Jina, they went along. When not, Trump was left alone with EO.

The gop congress won the 20 election and Trump lost. That wasn't the MSM's doing. People didn't like Trump's act.id

Trump’s allies are, unlike yourself, pro-US.

fuck your own fascist ass. Voters voted him out despite knowing his policies. Blame him not them.

 

[bendog]

Will Establishment Media Cover Biden as President?
They covered for him to get Trump out of office. Now will they actually start covering him with real reporting?​

Will Establishment Media Cover Biden as President? | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics
7 Dec 2020 ~~ By J.T. Young
Having created his presidency, how will establishment media cover President Biden? With the roles so different and so separated, it is easy to forget that establishment media have been instrumental throughout Biden’s three-decade-long presidential quest. In his first two campaigns, establishment media sank Biden by covering him; in his latest, they saved Biden by not covering him. Now with Biden elected, which role will they assume?
The first role establishment media played in Biden campaigns was aggressively direct.
In 1988, during his first campaign, they single-handedly destroyed Biden by revealing a pattern of plagiarism. Initially, revelations showed Biden had lifted portions from a speech by UK Labor politician Neil Kinnock. Then came more: “borrowings” from Hubert Humphrey and Robert Kennedy. Finally, they reported that Biden had failed a Syracuse University law course because he used five pages of a law-review publication without attribution.
~[snip]~
In contrast to their direct role in his first two presidential campaigns, establishment media’s role in Biden’s third presidential campaign has been indirect at best. Instead of essentially covering him to death, this time they effectively did not cover him at all.
In the 2020 campaign, establishment media did not force Biden into any mistakes or awkward encounters. When he blundered, they did not pursue. When they could have destroyed him, following disappointing Iowa and New Hampshire finishes, they held back.
Once Biden had secured the Democrat nomination, establishment media allowed him to retire from scrutiny for six months — despite him being the Democrat nominee and frontrunner. When he finally emerged after accepting formal nomination, they acquiesced to scripted encounters or being relegated to being observers. When encounters did occur, they were notably “soft.”
Now Biden is president-elect. In less than two months he will be president, making him the planet’s most newsworthy person. Will establishment media reestablish a direct role with Biden?
~[snip]~
Competition and demand will dictate coverage, even by establishment media. Coverage will open a window that Biden’s staff and establishment media effectively closed for the last 12 months. And exposure makes the public a participant: Establishment media’s coverage cannot long contradict what the public see.
Finally, it is unclear how much establishment media really care for Biden. They did not particularly in his first two campaigns. This time, his primary attraction for them has been his usefulness in purging Trump. Trump is now gone. Establishment media certainly will not like a continuation of his year-long, arm’s-length campaign treatment of them.
Having covered for Biden, establishment media will have to start covering him, whether they want to or not. It will be interesting to see how much better he fares as president than in his first two presidential campaigns.


Comment:
Surely the Quisling Media, Big Tech and Big Pharma have financed the election of China Joe Biden.
As J.T. Young points out, eventually the exposure to the media can't hide what the public actually sees.
Will the Lame Stream Media allow Biden and his administration arm's-length treatment of them to continue using the excuse of the Chinese Covid Virus excuse, or will they begin exposing Democrats in truthful reporting?

Yes, but not to the extent of coverage of DJT. It is unlikely Joe will be tweeting on the attack at 3 A.M. with the intent of entertaining his base or intentionally antagonizing people that did not vote for him. Nor will he be sticking up for old enemies, dictators and communists on the world stage overseas. Donnie invited the coverage he got, with his own dramatics and his administration personnel, likewise knew that he would look on it a valid support of his style of leadership (if you can call that) if they spoke out as pot stirrers also. B.O. wanted to be no drama Obama, though didn't always pull it off. Joe wants to be the "adults are back in office" president, and will attempt to show how it is supposed to be done, in a country that really needs to re-remember that we are all in this together and serious problems need serious low-key, low drama management style as the order of the day.

bull ! the media started attacking Trump and carried the russia collusion lie for 4yrs ! the msm didnt give the man credit for anything not even the peace deals between Israel and numerous arab countries or operation warop speed that has enabled a vaccine to be produced in record time [and will begin distribution in a few days !] and the economy that he presided over do to his cutting of taxes and regs and better trade deals and record unemployment until the the virus was unleashed by a country that the left or the msm refuse to place any blame whatsoever ! the msm has never been fair to the man ! and the fact that you believe or [claim to believe ] otherwise proves you are not a middle of the line independent !

Well Trump was urging his supporters to at least verbally harrass MSM media reporters at his campaign "events." HE based his entire candidacy on some sense of grievance against both the gop and dem establishments.

I've posted before that not ALL of his policies were fuck ups. But his personality made any compromise with opponents, or allies, impossible. When he was useful to Moscow Mitch or even Jina, they went along. When not, Trump was left alone with EO.

The gop congress won the 20 election and Trump lost. That wasn't the MSM's doing. People didn't like Trump's act.

If he did it is because Deplorables are amateurs at this crap. And they are slowly learning the game. Trump's act was pre determined by the viciousness of the time from before his swearing in until 2020. The people in the media are protected. And in reality most are cowards. Talking the vile venom they do and living the life of riley and not even being in the trenches is the ultimate evil act.

Trump could have run a charm campaign after the 16 election with both the MSM and Hill supporters. He wouldn't have been the first president elect to do so. Reagan for example. Trump is simply not capable of that behavior. And essentially that's why Biden won. Voters were tired of his act, and he never really leveled over covid

 

[Gary Lee]

Will Establishment Media Cover Biden as President?
They covered for him to get Trump out of office. Now will they actually start covering him with real reporting?​

Will Establishment Media Cover Biden as President? | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics
7 Dec 2020 ~~ By J.T. Young
Having created his presidency, how will establishment media cover President Biden? With the roles so different and so separated, it is easy to forget that establishment media have been instrumental throughout Biden’s three-decade-long presidential quest. In his first two campaigns, establishment media sank Biden by covering him; in his latest, they saved Biden by not covering him. Now with Biden elected, which role will they assume?
The first role establishment media played in Biden campaigns was aggressively direct.
In 1988, during his first campaign, they single-handedly destroyed Biden by revealing a pattern of plagiarism. Initially, revelations showed Biden had lifted portions from a speech by UK Labor politician Neil Kinnock. Then came more: “borrowings” from Hubert Humphrey and Robert Kennedy. Finally, they reported that Biden had failed a Syracuse University law course because he used five pages of a law-review publication without attribution.
~[snip]~
In contrast to their direct role in his first two presidential campaigns, establishment media’s role in Biden’s third presidential campaign has been indirect at best. Instead of essentially covering him to death, this time they effectively did not cover him at all.
In the 2020 campaign, establishment media did not force Biden into any mistakes or awkward encounters. When he blundered, they did not pursue. When they could have destroyed him, following disappointing Iowa and New Hampshire finishes, they held back.
Once Biden had secured the Democrat nomination, establishment media allowed him to retire from scrutiny for six months — despite him being the Democrat nominee and frontrunner. When he finally emerged after accepting formal nomination, they acquiesced to scripted encounters or being relegated to being observers. When encounters did occur, they were notably “soft.”
Now Biden is president-elect. In less than two months he will be president, making him the planet’s most newsworthy person. Will establishment media reestablish a direct role with Biden?
~[snip]~
Competition and demand will dictate coverage, even by establishment media. Coverage will open a window that Biden’s staff and establishment media effectively closed for the last 12 months. And exposure makes the public a participant: Establishment media’s coverage cannot long contradict what the public see.
Finally, it is unclear how much establishment media really care for Biden. They did not particularly in his first two campaigns. This time, his primary attraction for them has been his usefulness in purging Trump. Trump is now gone. Establishment media certainly will not like a continuation of his year-long, arm’s-length campaign treatment of them.
Having covered for Biden, establishment media will have to start covering him, whether they want to or not. It will be interesting to see how much better he fares as president than in his first two presidential campaigns.


Comment:
Surely the Quisling Media, Big Tech and Big Pharma have financed the election of China Joe Biden.
As J.T. Young points out, eventually the exposure to the media can't hide what the public actually sees.
Will the Lame Stream Media allow Biden and his administration arm's-length treatment of them to continue using the excuse of the Chinese Covid Virus excuse, or will they begin exposing Democrats in truthful reporting?

They're already treating Biden as though he were another coming of da 2nd black Jesus. How here's a POTUS elect who ran on a platform to reconcile and unify all Americans. Yet immediately after elected started attacking the most reverend & cherished amendment enshrined in our Constitution, The Second Amendment!!! Without the Second Amendment and those with the courage to enforce it the whole Constitution is nothing more than fancy worded butt wipe the left will use profusely.

 

[9thIDdoc]

"Will Establishment Media Cover Biden as President?"

More importantly will anyone believe or care about what they have to say?

 

[BluesLegend]

Will Establishment Media Cover Biden as President?

Cover for him? They'll have to! They will have to cover for him, feed him lines, explain him, literally put their hand up his ass, make him walk and talk, then explain to us what he really meant.

They will have a full team round-table of experts working full time around the clock on hiding half the things he says and does while trying to explain, spin and creatively make up stories to justify the rest.

I pity the establishment media, damage control for Biden vs Obama is going to be hilarious. I predict mass volumes of but but but what Biden really meant to say is...

 

[bendog]

McConnell and who controls the House in 22 are the wildcards. McConnell probably has run his last race. Chances favor the gop unless the econ rebounds

 

[White 6]

Will Establishment Media Cover Biden as President?
They covered for him to get Trump out of office. Now will they actually start covering him with real reporting?​

Will Establishment Media Cover Biden as President? | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics
7 Dec 2020 ~~ By J.T. Young
Having created his presidency, how will establishment media cover President Biden? With the roles so different and so separated, it is easy to forget that establishment media have been instrumental throughout Biden’s three-decade-long presidential quest. In his first two campaigns, establishment media sank Biden by covering him; in his latest, they saved Biden by not covering him. Now with Biden elected, which role will they assume?
The first role establishment media played in Biden campaigns was aggressively direct.
In 1988, during his first campaign, they single-handedly destroyed Biden by revealing a pattern of plagiarism. Initially, revelations showed Biden had lifted portions from a speech by UK Labor politician Neil Kinnock. Then came more: “borrowings” from Hubert Humphrey and Robert Kennedy. Finally, they reported that Biden had failed a Syracuse University law course because he used five pages of a law-review publication without attribution.
~[snip]~
In contrast to their direct role in his first two presidential campaigns, establishment media’s role in Biden’s third presidential campaign has been indirect at best. Instead of essentially covering him to death, this time they effectively did not cover him at all.
In the 2020 campaign, establishment media did not force Biden into any mistakes or awkward encounters. When he blundered, they did not pursue. When they could have destroyed him, following disappointing Iowa and New Hampshire finishes, they held back.
Once Biden had secured the Democrat nomination, establishment media allowed him to retire from scrutiny for six months — despite him being the Democrat nominee and frontrunner. When he finally emerged after accepting formal nomination, they acquiesced to scripted encounters or being relegated to being observers. When encounters did occur, they were notably “soft.”
Now Biden is president-elect. In less than two months he will be president, making him the planet’s most newsworthy person. Will establishment media reestablish a direct role with Biden?
~[snip]~
Competition and demand will dictate coverage, even by establishment media. Coverage will open a window that Biden’s staff and establishment media effectively closed for the last 12 months. And exposure makes the public a participant: Establishment media’s coverage cannot long contradict what the public see.
Finally, it is unclear how much establishment media really care for Biden. They did not particularly in his first two campaigns. This time, his primary attraction for them has been his usefulness in purging Trump. Trump is now gone. Establishment media certainly will not like a continuation of his year-long, arm’s-length campaign treatment of them.
Having covered for Biden, establishment media will have to start covering him, whether they want to or not. It will be interesting to see how much better he fares as president than in his first two presidential campaigns.


Comment:
Surely the Quisling Media, Big Tech and Big Pharma have financed the election of China Joe Biden.
As J.T. Young points out, eventually the exposure to the media can't hide what the public actually sees.
Will the Lame Stream Media allow Biden and his administration arm's-length treatment of them to continue using the excuse of the Chinese Covid Virus excuse, or will they begin exposing Democrats in truthful reporting?

Yes, but not to the extent of coverage of DJT. It is unlikely Joe will be tweeting on the attack at 3 A.M. with the intent of entertaining his base or intentionally antagonizing people that did not vote for him. Nor will he be sticking up for old enemies, dictators and communists on the world stage overseas. Donnie invited the coverage he got, with his own dramatics and his administration personnel, likewise knew that he would look on it a valid support of his style of leadership (if you can call that) if they spoke out as pot stirrers also. B.O. wanted to be no drama Obama, though didn't always pull it off. Joe wants to be the "adults are back in office" president, and will attempt to show how it is supposed to be done, in a country that really needs to re-remember that we are all in this together and serious problems need serious low-key, low drama management style as the order of the day.

bull ! the media started attacking Trump and carried the russia collusion lie for 4yrs ! the msm didnt give the man credit for anything not even the peace deals between Israel and numerous arab countries or operation warp speed that has enabled a vaccine to be produced in record time [and will begin distribution in a few days !] and the economy that he presided over do to his cutting of taxes and regs and better trade deals and record unemployment until the the virus was unleashed by a country that the left or the msm refuse to place any blame whatsoever ! the msm has never been fair to the man ! and the fact that you believe or [claim to believe ] otherwise proves you are not a middle of the line independent !

Trump drew attention to it daily. Collusion was a red herring of the right. Trump said as much, taunting would not matter if he did, as he knew there is no federal collusion statute. To this day, I am not sure what trump and crew really did for the peace deal that did not occur at the white house, but in the middle east where it actually had to be. At the same time, we heard him take credit for it daily and who knows maybe his people had something to do with it. I do not know. I would have turned the whole middle east (Iran included) over to Israel and the UAE to deal with a long time ago and quietly backed however they wanted to play it with equipment and intel if they needed it. In that theater, they are usually better at intel gathering than we are. Have no problem with operation warp speed, but others were working on it as it will be a major profit center and big pharma in all countries with the where with all, were and are vying for a piece. The economy was steadily improving under Obama and when trump got it, was in good and improving shape. He handled the virus all wrong, especially withhold from the public what he knew and admitted on tape in private, along with influencing his sheep that it was not dangerous and they should scoff at precautions to back him up. Saying it was a problem only if your were old and had known or unknown med problems did not impress anybody either, certainly not me as I had just turn the age he didn't give a damn about.
This is the reasonable view, in my opinion, that he brought most of the negative press on himself, including denigrating soldiers injured in a war zone as well as unwarranted attacks on gold star families, veterans that were captured, shot down or dead, plus siding with Putin and Erdegon to allow invasion and attack on real allies and all the rest. For four years it was his way or the highway as everybody was either 24/7 pro trump and whatever crazy crap he was putting out (no matter how batshit crazy) or another enemy for him to attempt to vanquish for his own ego. You bought into it and willingly gave your support. Fine. Most of the rest of us and indeed the world did not. It is the loudest and squeakiest roadwheel that gets the most grease and it always has been. He just didn't get it. Joe will be much more low key as we deserve a break today. He got his from McDonalds. We're getting a break from him whether he wants to give us a break or not. Cheer up.

 

[Circe]

Biden and Harris will be 44.2 a love fest. The only thing that will make any of it bearable will be watching the left trying to pretend that they actually wanted the higher taxes and trying to defend the idiots.

I'm just afraid Harris will eat him up....... she has that hungry look. My husband keeps saying he'll be gone before June.

 

[22lcidw]

Will Establishment Media Cover Biden as President?
They covered for him to get Trump out of office. Now will they actually start covering him with real reporting?​

Will Establishment Media Cover Biden as President? | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics
7 Dec 2020 ~~ By J.T. Young
Having created his presidency, how will establishment media cover President Biden? With the roles so different and so separated, it is easy to forget that establishment media have been instrumental throughout Biden’s three-decade-long presidential quest. In his first two campaigns, establishment media sank Biden by covering him; in his latest, they saved Biden by not covering him. Now with Biden elected, which role will they assume?
The first role establishment media played in Biden campaigns was aggressively direct.
In 1988, during his first campaign, they single-handedly destroyed Biden by revealing a pattern of plagiarism. Initially, revelations showed Biden had lifted portions from a speech by UK Labor politician Neil Kinnock. Then came more: “borrowings” from Hubert Humphrey and Robert Kennedy. Finally, they reported that Biden had failed a Syracuse University law course because he used five pages of a law-review publication without attribution.
~[snip]~
In contrast to their direct role in his first two presidential campaigns, establishment media’s role in Biden’s third presidential campaign has been indirect at best. Instead of essentially covering him to death, this time they effectively did not cover him at all.
In the 2020 campaign, establishment media did not force Biden into any mistakes or awkward encounters. When he blundered, they did not pursue. When they could have destroyed him, following disappointing Iowa and New Hampshire finishes, they held back.
Once Biden had secured the Democrat nomination, establishment media allowed him to retire from scrutiny for six months — despite him being the Democrat nominee and frontrunner. When he finally emerged after accepting formal nomination, they acquiesced to scripted encounters or being relegated to being observers. When encounters did occur, they were notably “soft.”
Now Biden is president-elect. In less than two months he will be president, making him the planet’s most newsworthy person. Will establishment media reestablish a direct role with Biden?
~[snip]~
Competition and demand will dictate coverage, even by establishment media. Coverage will open a window that Biden’s staff and establishment media effectively closed for the last 12 months. And exposure makes the public a participant: Establishment media’s coverage cannot long contradict what the public see.
Finally, it is unclear how much establishment media really care for Biden. They did not particularly in his first two campaigns. This time, his primary attraction for them has been his usefulness in purging Trump. Trump is now gone. Establishment media certainly will not like a continuation of his year-long, arm’s-length campaign treatment of them.
Having covered for Biden, establishment media will have to start covering him, whether they want to or not. It will be interesting to see how much better he fares as president than in his first two presidential campaigns.


Comment:
Surely the Quisling Media, Big Tech and Big Pharma have financed the election of China Joe Biden.
As J.T. Young points out, eventually the exposure to the media can't hide what the public actually sees.
Will the Lame Stream Media allow Biden and his administration arm's-length treatment of them to continue using the excuse of the Chinese Covid Virus excuse, or will they begin exposing Democrats in truthful reporting?

Yes, but not to the extent of coverage of DJT. It is unlikely Joe will be tweeting on the attack at 3 A.M. with the intent of entertaining his base or intentionally antagonizing people that did not vote for him. Nor will he be sticking up for old enemies, dictators and communists on the world stage overseas. Donnie invited the coverage he got, with his own dramatics and his administration personnel, likewise knew that he would look on it a valid support of his style of leadership (if you can call that) if they spoke out as pot stirrers also. B.O. wanted to be no drama Obama, though didn't always pull it off. Joe wants to be the "adults are back in office" president, and will attempt to show how it is supposed to be done, in a country that really needs to re-remember that we are all in this together and serious problems need serious low-key, low drama management style as the order of the day.

bull ! the media started attacking Trump and carried the russia collusion lie for 4yrs ! the msm didnt give the man credit for anything not even the peace deals between Israel and numerous arab countries or operation warop speed that has enabled a vaccine to be produced in record time [and will begin distribution in a few days !] and the economy that he presided over do to his cutting of taxes and regs and better trade deals and record unemployment until the the virus was unleashed by a country that the left or the msm refuse to place any blame whatsoever ! the msm has never been fair to the man ! and the fact that you believe or [claim to believe ] otherwise proves you are not a middle of the line independent !

Well Trump was urging his supporters to at least verbally harrass MSM media reporters at his campaign "events." HE based his entire candidacy on some sense of grievance against both the gop and dem establishments.

I've posted before that not ALL of his policies were fuck ups. But his personality made any compromise with opponents, or allies, impossible. When he was useful to Moscow Mitch or even Jina, they went along. When not, Trump was left alone with EO.

The gop congress won the 20 election and Trump lost. That wasn't the MSM's doing. People didn't like Trump's act.

If he did it is because Deplorables are amateurs at this crap. And they are slowly learning the game. Trump's act was pre determined by the viciousness of the time from before his swearing in until 2020. The people in the media are protected. And in reality most are cowards. Talking the vile venom they do and living the life of riley and not even being in the trenches is the ultimate evil act.

Trump could have run a charm campaign after the 16 election with both the MSM and Hill supporters. He wouldn't have been the first president elect to do so. Reagan for example. Trump is simply not capable of that behavior. And essentially that's why Biden won. Voters were tired of his act, and he never really leveled over covid

Trump is not Reagan. What act? It is the promotion of globalism over a free nation state. The ghettos will be eliminated in a bad way when globalist doctrines are the laws of the planet.

 

[yidnar]

Will Establishment Media Cover Biden as President?
They covered for him to get Trump out of office. Now will they actually start covering him with real reporting?​

Will Establishment Media Cover Biden as President? | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics
7 Dec 2020 ~~ By J.T. Young
Having created his presidency, how will establishment media cover President Biden? With the roles so different and so separated, it is easy to forget that establishment media have been instrumental throughout Biden’s three-decade-long presidential quest. In his first two campaigns, establishment media sank Biden by covering him; in his latest, they saved Biden by not covering him. Now with Biden elected, which role will they assume?
The first role establishment media played in Biden campaigns was aggressively direct.
In 1988, during his first campaign, they single-handedly destroyed Biden by revealing a pattern of plagiarism. Initially, revelations showed Biden had lifted portions from a speech by UK Labor politician Neil Kinnock. Then came more: “borrowings” from Hubert Humphrey and Robert Kennedy. Finally, they reported that Biden had failed a Syracuse University law course because he used five pages of a law-review publication without attribution.
~[snip]~
In contrast to their direct role in his first two presidential campaigns, establishment media’s role in Biden’s third presidential campaign has been indirect at best. Instead of essentially covering him to death, this time they effectively did not cover him at all.
In the 2020 campaign, establishment media did not force Biden into any mistakes or awkward encounters. When he blundered, they did not pursue. When they could have destroyed him, following disappointing Iowa and New Hampshire finishes, they held back.
Once Biden had secured the Democrat nomination, establishment media allowed him to retire from scrutiny for six months — despite him being the Democrat nominee and frontrunner. When he finally emerged after accepting formal nomination, they acquiesced to scripted encounters or being relegated to being observers. When encounters did occur, they were notably “soft.”
Now Biden is president-elect. In less than two months he will be president, making him the planet’s most newsworthy person. Will establishment media reestablish a direct role with Biden?
~[snip]~
Competition and demand will dictate coverage, even by establishment media. Coverage will open a window that Biden’s staff and establishment media effectively closed for the last 12 months. And exposure makes the public a participant: Establishment media’s coverage cannot long contradict what the public see.
Finally, it is unclear how much establishment media really care for Biden. They did not particularly in his first two campaigns. This time, his primary attraction for them has been his usefulness in purging Trump. Trump is now gone. Establishment media certainly will not like a continuation of his year-long, arm’s-length campaign treatment of them.
Having covered for Biden, establishment media will have to start covering him, whether they want to or not. It will be interesting to see how much better he fares as president than in his first two presidential campaigns.


Comment:
Surely the Quisling Media, Big Tech and Big Pharma have financed the election of China Joe Biden.
As J.T. Young points out, eventually the exposure to the media can't hide what the public actually sees.
Will the Lame Stream Media allow Biden and his administration arm's-length treatment of them to continue using the excuse of the Chinese Covid Virus excuse, or will they begin exposing Democrats in truthful reporting?

Yes, but not to the extent of coverage of DJT. It is unlikely Joe will be tweeting on the attack at 3 A.M. with the intent of entertaining his base or intentionally antagonizing people that did not vote for him. Nor will he be sticking up for old enemies, dictators and communists on the world stage overseas. Donnie invited the coverage he got, with his own dramatics and his administration personnel, likewise knew that he would look on it a valid support of his style of leadership (if you can call that) if they spoke out as pot stirrers also. B.O. wanted to be no drama Obama, though didn't always pull it off. Joe wants to be the "adults are back in office" president, and will attempt to show how it is supposed to be done, in a country that really needs to re-remember that we are all in this together and serious problems need serious low-key, low drama management style as the order of the day.

bull ! the media started attacking Trump and carried the russia collusion lie for 4yrs ! the msm didnt give the man credit for anything not even the peace deals between Israel and numerous arab countries or operation warop speed that has enabled a vaccine to be produced in record time [and will begin distribution in a few days !] and the economy that he presided over do to his cutting of taxes and regs and better trade deals and record unemployment until the the virus was unleashed by a country that the left or the msm refuse to place any blame whatsoever ! the msm has never been fair to the man ! and the fact that you believe or [claim to believe ] otherwise proves you are not a middle of the line independent !

Well Trump was urging his supporters to at least verbally harrass MSM media reporters at his campaign "events" in 16 HE based his entire candidacy on some sense of grievance against both the gop and dem establishments.

I've posted before that not ALL of his policies were fuck ups. But his personality made any compromise with opponents, or allies, impossible. When he was useful to Moscow Mitch or even Jina, they went along. When not, Trump was left alone with EO.

The gop congress won the 20 election and Trump lost. That wasn't the MSM's doing. People didn't like Trump's act.

well maybe biden will act nice while he sells us out to china and the globalists ! will that make them feel better.

 

[yidnar]

If, and that's a big 'if', Biden pulls a fraction of the destructive stuff Trump pulled or said or tweeted, the media boogeyman you mouth breathing Trumpians fear so much will call him out.

Big difference? Biden is a mature, responsible leader.

yep he led his son to Ukraine and china !

 

[yidnar]

Will Establishment Media Cover Biden as President?
They covered for him to get Trump out of office. Now will they actually start covering him with real reporting?​

Will Establishment Media Cover Biden as President? | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics
7 Dec 2020 ~~ By J.T. Young
Having created his presidency, how will establishment media cover President Biden? With the roles so different and so separated, it is easy to forget that establishment media have been instrumental throughout Biden’s three-decade-long presidential quest. In his first two campaigns, establishment media sank Biden by covering him; in his latest, they saved Biden by not covering him. Now with Biden elected, which role will they assume?
The first role establishment media played in Biden campaigns was aggressively direct.
In 1988, during his first campaign, they single-handedly destroyed Biden by revealing a pattern of plagiarism. Initially, revelations showed Biden had lifted portions from a speech by UK Labor politician Neil Kinnock. Then came more: “borrowings” from Hubert Humphrey and Robert Kennedy. Finally, they reported that Biden had failed a Syracuse University law course because he used five pages of a law-review publication without attribution.
~[snip]~
In contrast to their direct role in his first two presidential campaigns, establishment media’s role in Biden’s third presidential campaign has been indirect at best. Instead of essentially covering him to death, this time they effectively did not cover him at all.
In the 2020 campaign, establishment media did not force Biden into any mistakes or awkward encounters. When he blundered, they did not pursue. When they could have destroyed him, following disappointing Iowa and New Hampshire finishes, they held back.
Once Biden had secured the Democrat nomination, establishment media allowed him to retire from scrutiny for six months — despite him being the Democrat nominee and frontrunner. When he finally emerged after accepting formal nomination, they acquiesced to scripted encounters or being relegated to being observers. When encounters did occur, they were notably “soft.”
Now Biden is president-elect. In less than two months he will be president, making him the planet’s most newsworthy person. Will establishment media reestablish a direct role with Biden?
~[snip]~
Competition and demand will dictate coverage, even by establishment media. Coverage will open a window that Biden’s staff and establishment media effectively closed for the last 12 months. And exposure makes the public a participant: Establishment media’s coverage cannot long contradict what the public see.
Finally, it is unclear how much establishment media really care for Biden. They did not particularly in his first two campaigns. This time, his primary attraction for them has been his usefulness in purging Trump. Trump is now gone. Establishment media certainly will not like a continuation of his year-long, arm’s-length campaign treatment of them.
Having covered for Biden, establishment media will have to start covering him, whether they want to or not. It will be interesting to see how much better he fares as president than in his first two presidential campaigns.


Comment:
Surely the Quisling Media, Big Tech and Big Pharma have financed the election of China Joe Biden.
As J.T. Young points out, eventually the exposure to the media can't hide what the public actually sees.
Will the Lame Stream Media allow Biden and his administration arm's-length treatment of them to continue using the excuse of the Chinese Covid Virus excuse, or will they begin exposing Democrats in truthful reporting?

Yes, but not to the extent of coverage of DJT. It is unlikely Joe will be tweeting on the attack at 3 A.M. with the intent of entertaining his base or intentionally antagonizing people that did not vote for him. Nor will he be sticking up for old enemies, dictators and communists on the world stage overseas. Donnie invited the coverage he got, with his own dramatics and his administration personnel, likewise knew that he would look on it a valid support of his style of leadership (if you can call that) if they spoke out as pot stirrers also. B.O. wanted to be no drama Obama, though didn't always pull it off. Joe wants to be the "adults are back in office" president, and will attempt to show how it is supposed to be done, in a country that really needs to re-remember that we are all in this together and serious problems need serious low-key, low drama management style as the order of the day.

bull ! the media started attacking Trump and carried the russia collusion lie for 4yrs ! the msm didnt give the man credit for anything not even the peace deals between Israel and numerous arab countries or operation warp speed that has enabled a vaccine to be produced in record time [and will begin distribution in a few days !] and the economy that he presided over do to his cutting of taxes and regs and better trade deals and record unemployment until the the virus was unleashed by a country that the left or the msm refuse to place any blame whatsoever ! the msm has never been fair to the man ! and the fact that you believe or [claim to believe ] otherwise proves you are not a middle of the line independent !

Trump drew attention to it daily. Collusion was a red herring of the right. Trump said as much, taunting would not matter if he did, as he knew there is no federal collusion statute. To this day, I am not sure what trump and crew really did for the peace deal that did not occur at the white house, but in the middle east where it actually had to be. At the same time, we heard him take credit for it daily and who knows maybe his people had something to do with it. I do not know. I would have turned the whole middle east (Iran included) over to Israel and the UAE to deal with a long time ago and quietly backed however they wanted to play it with equipment and intel if they needed it. In that theater, they are usually better at intel gathering than we are. Have no problem with operation warp speed, but others were working on it as it will be a major profit center and big pharma in all countries with the where with all, were and are vying for a piece. The economy was steadily improving under Obama and when trump got it, was in good and improving shape. He handled the virus all wrong, especially withhold from the public what he knew and admitted on tape in private, along with influencing his sheep that it was not dangerous and they should scoff at precautions to back him up. Saying it was a problem only if your were old and had known or unknown med problems did not impress anybody either, certainly not me as I had just turn the age he didn't give a damn about.
This is the reasonable view, in my opinion, that he brought most of the negative press on himself, including denigrating soldiers injured in a war zone as well as unwarranted attacks on gold star families, veterans that were captured, shot down or dead, plus siding with Putin and Erdegon to allow invasion and attack on real allies and all the rest. For four years it was his way or the highway as everybody was either 24/7 pro trump and whatever crazy crap he was putting out (no matter how batshit crazy) or another enemy for him to attempt to vanquish for his own ego. You bought into it and willingly gave your support. Fine. Most of the rest of us and indeed the world did not. It is the loudest and squeakiest roadwheel that gets the most grease and it always has been. He just didn't get it. Joe will be much more low key as we deserve a break today. He got his from McDonalds. We're getting a break from him whether he wants to give us a break or not. Cheer up.

and exactly what policy has biden championed in his 50 yrs of government leads you to believe he will be a good leader ? was it nafta ? was it being instrumental in welcoming china into the who ? was it his hesitancy to pull the trigger on Bin laden ? was it his crime bill that put millions in prison for petty drug charges ? tell us what has he done in those 50 yrs that gives you confidence .

 

[Maxdeath]

Biden and Harris will be 44.2 a love fest. The only thing that will make any of it bearable will be watching the left trying to pretend that they actually wanted the higher taxes and trying to defend the idiots.

I'm just afraid Harris will eat him up....... she has that hungry look. My husband keeps saying he'll be gone before June.

I think they may get rid of him but there is a possibility that they will keep him and just let him pretend while they pull the strings and write little fluff piece speeches for him to read.
The thing is no matter what someone is going to be paying for free tuition, free healthcare, the new green deal and everything else. It shire is not going to be the wealthy. They are ready to leave if they can. Money will be transferred out of the country. Profits from companies will go overseas. That means either bank breaking debt or the working class picking up the price in higher taxes.
If we are to give up oil that means millions of jobs and dependence on other countries. Hell even electric cars means a greater dependence on gas fired power plants.

 

[yidnar]

 

[White 6]

Will Establishment Media Cover Biden as President?
They covered for him to get Trump out of office. Now will they actually start covering him with real reporting?​

Will Establishment Media Cover Biden as President? | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics
7 Dec 2020 ~~ By J.T. Young
Having created his presidency, how will establishment media cover President Biden? With the roles so different and so separated, it is easy to forget that establishment media have been instrumental throughout Biden’s three-decade-long presidential quest. In his first two campaigns, establishment media sank Biden by covering him; in his latest, they saved Biden by not covering him. Now with Biden elected, which role will they assume?
The first role establishment media played in Biden campaigns was aggressively direct.
In 1988, during his first campaign, they single-handedly destroyed Biden by revealing a pattern of plagiarism. Initially, revelations showed Biden had lifted portions from a speech by UK Labor politician Neil Kinnock. Then came more: “borrowings” from Hubert Humphrey and Robert Kennedy. Finally, they reported that Biden had failed a Syracuse University law course because he used five pages of a law-review publication without attribution.
~[snip]~
In contrast to their direct role in his first two presidential campaigns, establishment media’s role in Biden’s third presidential campaign has been indirect at best. Instead of essentially covering him to death, this time they effectively did not cover him at all.
In the 2020 campaign, establishment media did not force Biden into any mistakes or awkward encounters. When he blundered, they did not pursue. When they could have destroyed him, following disappointing Iowa and New Hampshire finishes, they held back.
Once Biden had secured the Democrat nomination, establishment media allowed him to retire from scrutiny for six months — despite him being the Democrat nominee and frontrunner. When he finally emerged after accepting formal nomination, they acquiesced to scripted encounters or being relegated to being observers. When encounters did occur, they were notably “soft.”
Now Biden is president-elect. In less than two months he will be president, making him the planet’s most newsworthy person. Will establishment media reestablish a direct role with Biden?
~[snip]~
Competition and demand will dictate coverage, even by establishment media. Coverage will open a window that Biden’s staff and establishment media effectively closed for the last 12 months. And exposure makes the public a participant: Establishment media’s coverage cannot long contradict what the public see.
Finally, it is unclear how much establishment media really care for Biden. They did not particularly in his first two campaigns. This time, his primary attraction for them has been his usefulness in purging Trump. Trump is now gone. Establishment media certainly will not like a continuation of his year-long, arm’s-length campaign treatment of them.
Having covered for Biden, establishment media will have to start covering him, whether they want to or not. It will be interesting to see how much better he fares as president than in his first two presidential campaigns.


Comment:
Surely the Quisling Media, Big Tech and Big Pharma have financed the election of China Joe Biden.
As J.T. Young points out, eventually the exposure to the media can't hide what the public actually sees.
Will the Lame Stream Media allow Biden and his administration arm's-length treatment of them to continue using the excuse of the Chinese Covid Virus excuse, or will they begin exposing Democrats in truthful reporting?

Yes, but not to the extent of coverage of DJT. It is unlikely Joe will be tweeting on the attack at 3 A.M. with the intent of entertaining his base or intentionally antagonizing people that did not vote for him. Nor will he be sticking up for old enemies, dictators and communists on the world stage overseas. Donnie invited the coverage he got, with his own dramatics and his administration personnel, likewise knew that he would look on it a valid support of his style of leadership (if you can call that) if they spoke out as pot stirrers also. B.O. wanted to be no drama Obama, though didn't always pull it off. Joe wants to be the "adults are back in office" president, and will attempt to show how it is supposed to be done, in a country that really needs to re-remember that we are all in this together and serious problems need serious low-key, low drama management style as the order of the day.

bull ! the media started attacking Trump and carried the russia collusion lie for 4yrs ! the msm didnt give the man credit for anything not even the peace deals between Israel and numerous arab countries or operation warp speed that has enabled a vaccine to be produced in record time [and will begin distribution in a few days !] and the economy that he presided over do to his cutting of taxes and regs and better trade deals and record unemployment until the the virus was unleashed by a country that the left or the msm refuse to place any blame whatsoever ! the msm has never been fair to the man ! and the fact that you believe or [claim to believe ] otherwise proves you are not a middle of the line independent !

Trump drew attention to it daily. Collusion was a red herring of the right. Trump said as much, taunting would not matter if he did, as he knew there is no federal collusion statute. To this day, I am not sure what trump and crew really did for the peace deal that did not occur at the white house, but in the middle east where it actually had to be. At the same time, we heard him take credit for it daily and who knows maybe his people had something to do with it. I do not know. I would have turned the whole middle east (Iran included) over to Israel and the UAE to deal with a long time ago and quietly backed however they wanted to play it with equipment and intel if they needed it. In that theater, they are usually better at intel gathering than we are. Have no problem with operation warp speed, but others were working on it as it will be a major profit center and big pharma in all countries with the where with all, were and are vying for a piece. The economy was steadily improving under Obama and when trump got it, was in good and improving shape. He handled the virus all wrong, especially withhold from the public what he knew and admitted on tape in private, along with influencing his sheep that it was not dangerous and they should scoff at precautions to back him up. Saying it was a problem only if your were old and had known or unknown med problems did not impress anybody either, certainly not me as I had just turn the age he didn't give a damn about.
This is the reasonable view, in my opinion, that he brought most of the negative press on himself, including denigrating soldiers injured in a war zone as well as unwarranted attacks on gold star families, veterans that were captured, shot down or dead, plus siding with Putin and Erdegon to allow invasion and attack on real allies and all the rest. For four years it was his way or the highway as everybody was either 24/7 pro trump and whatever crazy crap he was putting out (no matter how batshit crazy) or another enemy for him to attempt to vanquish for his own ego. You bought into it and willingly gave your support. Fine. Most of the rest of us and indeed the world did not. It is the loudest and squeakiest roadwheel that gets the most grease and it always has been. He just didn't get it. Joe will be much more low key as we deserve a break today. He got his from McDonalds. We're getting a break from him whether he wants to give us a break or not. Cheer up.

and exactly what policy has biden championed in his 50 yrs of government leads you to believe he will be a good leader ? was it nafta ? was it being instrumental in welcoming china into the who ? was it his hesitancy to pull the trigger on Bin laden ? was it his crime bill that put millions in prison for petty drug charges ? tell us what has he done in those 50 yrs that gives you confidence .

I'm not a good one to ask, but I liked his bipartisan crime bill back in the day, as I certainly didn't care if criminals went to jail and stayed there. It is just not popular now that donnie knocked down the sentencing guidelines and got a bunch released, Republicans not exactly being the law and order party anymore, even touting the reduction of sentencing guidelines in presidential debate. Bipartisanship it is a policy of Biden's I have always liked as a centrist, not tied to either party or extremes.

 

[Nosmo King]

If, and that's a big 'if', Biden pulls a fraction of the destructive stuff Trump pulled or said or tweeted, the media boogeyman you mouth breathing Trumpians fear so much will call him out.

Big difference? Biden is a mature, responsible leader.

yep he led his son to Ukraine and china !

Boy! Did that accusation land like a turd!

Couple that with election fraud, 30,000 emails and a "perfect phone call" and you get a trifecta of Trump lies and mistakes.

 

[WTH_Progs?]

Will Establishment Media Cover Biden as President?
They covered for him to get Trump out of office. Now will they actually start covering him with real reporting?​

Will Establishment Media Cover Biden as President? | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics
7 Dec 2020 ~~ By J.T. Young
Having created his presidency, how will establishment media cover President Biden? With the roles so different and so separated, it is easy to forget that establishment media have been instrumental throughout Biden’s three-decade-long presidential quest. In his first two campaigns, establishment media sank Biden by covering him; in his latest, they saved Biden by not covering him. Now with Biden elected, which role will they assume?
The first role establishment media played in Biden campaigns was aggressively direct.
In 1988, during his first campaign, they single-handedly destroyed Biden by revealing a pattern of plagiarism. Initially, revelations showed Biden had lifted portions from a speech by UK Labor politician Neil Kinnock. Then came more: “borrowings” from Hubert Humphrey and Robert Kennedy. Finally, they reported that Biden had failed a Syracuse University law course because he used five pages of a law-review publication without attribution.
~[snip]~
In contrast to their direct role in his first two presidential campaigns, establishment media’s role in Biden’s third presidential campaign has been indirect at best. Instead of essentially covering him to death, this time they effectively did not cover him at all.
In the 2020 campaign, establishment media did not force Biden into any mistakes or awkward encounters. When he blundered, they did not pursue. When they could have destroyed him, following disappointing Iowa and New Hampshire finishes, they held back.
Once Biden had secured the Democrat nomination, establishment media allowed him to retire from scrutiny for six months — despite him being the Democrat nominee and frontrunner. When he finally emerged after accepting formal nomination, they acquiesced to scripted encounters or being relegated to being observers. When encounters did occur, they were notably “soft.”
Now Biden is president-elect. In less than two months he will be president, making him the planet’s most newsworthy person. Will establishment media reestablish a direct role with Biden?
~[snip]~
Competition and demand will dictate coverage, even by establishment media. Coverage will open a window that Biden’s staff and establishment media effectively closed for the last 12 months. And exposure makes the public a participant: Establishment media’s coverage cannot long contradict what the public see.
Finally, it is unclear how much establishment media really care for Biden. They did not particularly in his first two campaigns. This time, his primary attraction for them has been his usefulness in purging Trump. Trump is now gone. Establishment media certainly will not like a continuation of his year-long, arm’s-length campaign treatment of them.
Having covered for Biden, establishment media will have to start covering him, whether they want to or not. It will be interesting to see how much better he fares as president than in his first two presidential campaigns.


Comment:
Surely the Quisling Media, Big Tech and Big Pharma have financed the election of China Joe Biden.
As J.T. Young points out, eventually the exposure to the media can't hide what the public actually sees.
Will the Lame Stream Media allow Biden and his administration arm's-length treatment of them to continue using the excuse of the Chinese Covid Virus excuse, or will they begin exposing Democrats in truthful reporting?

I'm sorry, but I stopped reading at "real reporting", you will never see that again under any terms, certainly not mainstream. Hopefully I'm wrong.