Why Would Biden Trust Iran Regarding Nukes When They Are Literally Gunning Their Own People Down In The Streets?

Wrong.
The rebels in Benghazi were mostly Islamic extremists trying to create violence, while Qaddafi was more of a secularist trying to reduce violence.
He only once tried to get revenge for the murder of his granddaughter by Reagan in the Gulf of Sidra incident.
daffy-duck was a "secularist" <<<< ROFLMAO
 
Wrong.
It is something called the "Rule of Law" and "Blind Justice".
It is how civilized people are supposed to live.
It works best.
What we are doing instead, is back to "Might makes Right", of the Dark Ages, which never works out very well for anyone.
Yes might makes right is precisely what russia has done by launching an illegal and unjustified war against Ukraine.
 
Wrong.
The US has deliberately done way too many evil things to dismiss it that cavalierly.
For example, since the whole world, plus our own ambassadors, CIA experts, generals, etc., said that Iraq was innocent of WMD claims, then it was deliberate murder for the US to then conduce "Shock and Awe", which intentionally attacked civilian infrastructure, a severe war crime.

Another America hating moral relativist.
 
Sorry, it was liberal mentally deranged snowflakes who tried earlier to rewrite history by claiming it was Trump who was responsible for NK acquiring nukes ... 10 YEARS BEFORE HE BECAME PRESIDENT.

Democrats / snowflake continuously attempt to claim others are who DEMOCRATS have proven themselves to be and attempt to falsely accuse others of doing what DEMOCRATS have done, are doing, and will continue to do.

Your weak-ass attempt to do the same now just proves its always 'SSDD' w/you clowns.

View attachment 704654
Lovely opinion piece but completely devoid of facts or evidence.
 
Your pathetic attempt to paint the US as a horrible country completely lacks fact, not that you give a damn.
Did I write something that was untrue or did it just offend your ideology?

You know the last damn Democrat President worth a shit was JFK. He wasn't a Marxist, Socialist, or self-serving, cowardly pussy.

JFK once declared, "We shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and success of liberty."

There hasn't been 1 Democrat president since JFK worth even the sweat off this man's balls!

Democrats since them have been cowardly, self-serving, own nation-hating / dividing authoritarian / totalitarian and enemy appeasers and traitors.

Pay any price, bear any burden?
- 'F* them! So what is a foreign dictator is oppressing them, torturing them, slaughtering them for rising up to demand freedom, and gasding their own people.'

Barry turned his back on the Irania people who rose up and attempted to overthrow their govt for freedom.

Biden groveled for oil before and fist-bumped the Butcher Of Khashoggi rather than stand up to him / Saudi.

Hell, JFK proved with that speech he was really a Republican.
And now for some whataboutisms. The last refuge of people with no valid arguments.
 
Do you not understand English, failed to comprehend what I posted in response the 1st time?

No wonder you are so pissed off at your country - your Democrat-run public education system failed you, and you get frustrated and grumpy when you have such a hard time reading / comprehending what you read.
I understand English just fine. It is you who have passed a premature judgement on Biden that may prove 100% wrong. How do you like your crow prepared?
 
Wrong.
It was a treaty ratified by Congress, negotiated through the UN, and therefore not subject to executive whim any more.
It had become US law.
Here are some of the details:
{...

On January 16, 2016, the International Atomic Energy Agency verified that Iran has completed the necessary steps under the Iran deal that will ensure Iran's nuclear program is and remains exclusively peaceful.​

Before this agreement, Iran's breakout time -- or the time it would have taken for Iran to gather enough fissile material to build a weapon -- was only two to three months. Today, because of the Iran deal, it would take Iran 12 months or more. And with the unprecedented monitoring and access this deal puts in place, if Iran tries, we will know and sanctions will snap back into place.

Here's how we got to this point. Since October, Iran has:
  • Shipped 25,000 pounds of enriched uranium out of the country
  • Dismantled and removed two-thirds of its centrifuges
  • Removed the calandria from its heavy water reactor and filled it with concrete
  • Provided unprecedented access to its nuclear facilities and supply chain
Because Iran has completed these steps, the U.S. and international community can begin the next phase under the JCPOA, which means the U.S. will begin lifting its nuclear-related sanctions on Iran. However, a number of U.S. sanctions authorities and designations will continue to remain in place.
...}
Link us up to the Senate vote ratifying it as a treaty. That would be public record Rigby5

This will be a hoot. :abgg2q.jpg:
 
Barry’s deal called for inspectors to oversee their nuclear opportations so we didn’t have to just take their word for it. Trump ripped it up while on his “destroy all things Barry” campaign
Barry’s deal allowed military bases to be off limits from inspections, Dumbass.

That alone makes it useless.
 
I understand English just fine. It is you who have passed a premature judgement on Biden that may prove 100% wrong. How do you like your crow prepared?
I have not passed judgement on Biden prematurely at all.

He has ALREADY violated the Constitution, broken US laws, and endangered US National Security.

These are recorded, documented FACT.

You just proved you can't read - or refused to do so - because I provided you with the facts / evidence.


You keep embarrassing yourself while falsely convincing yourself you are making valid, intelligent points.

TrumpLaugh.jpg
 
Wrong.
Congress can always only ratify a treaty AFTER the UN has passed it.
It could never have been just a unilateral deal by Obama because other countries were also involved.
And Congress did ratify it.
More lies.
 
Congress can always only ratify a treaty AFTER the UN has passed it.

1664832841032.png


Before whatever country sent you here in an attempt to infiltrate US social media, pass you off as an American, and have you spread propaganda ... sends anyone else...

They seriously need to either select more intelligent people for the mission OR update their pre-mission training material on the US govt and how it works.

After that comment you will NEVER get anyone to believe you are a US citizen now.

TrumpLaugh.jpg










media, pass rgeeir people off as
 
Another America hating moral relativist.
Iraq was very much into WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION---
poisons and biologicals -----and ATTEMPTING to create nuclear
energy. Amongst the poisons (but not limited to) were massive
stories of Nitrogen Mustard Gas (the recipe obtained from
fellow Baathist pig---Gamal Abdel Nasser---compliments of
Nazi Germany and some developments with
 
Iraq was very much into WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION---
poisons and biologicals -----and ATTEMPTING to create nuclear
energy. Amongst the poisons (but not limited to) were massive
stories of Nitrogen Mustard Gas (the recipe obtained from
fellow Baathist pig---Gamal Abdel Nasser---compliments of
Nazi Germany and some developments with
Iraq?
 
Why would ANYONE trust the USA on anything when the next President can just rip up your trade deals and slap tariffs on everything??

Trump showed how unreliable the USA really is.
Maybe Barry Hussein should have done the work to try to make this a treaty instead of just an Executive Order that is subject to being overturned by the next President. The reason he didn't is because he knew he would have his ass handed to him by the Senate if he ever brought that shit deal to them and asked them to sign off on it.

It wasn't a "trade deal", nor a treaty, Simp.
 

Forum List

Back
Top