Why Would Biden Trust Iran Regarding Nukes When They Are Literally Gunning Their Own People Down In The Streets?

[Rigby5]

What a f*ing LIAR!

After Barry negotiated his own PERSONAL deal with Iran he ran straight to the UN to get it ratified before allowing Congress to read it and vote on it.

It was both Un-Constitutional (violation of Separation Of Powers) and law!

You lost all credibility with your earlier Russian Troll bullshit. You're just continuing to ensure any shreds of it you may have had left have been wiped out.

View attachment 704726

Wrong.
Congress can always only ratify a treaty AFTER the UN has passed it.
It could never have been just a unilateral deal by Obama because other countries were also involved.
And Congress did ratify it.

 

[easyt65]

Then why does the US have the highest % imprisoned in the world?

Why are Soros-backed Democrat AGs putting revolving doors on police stations, letting thieves, rapists, pedophiles, and murderers out on the street as fast as they possibly can?

Why did / are Democrats support / supporting Defund the Police, turning Blue Cities into lawless zones?

Why are Blue-run cities like Chicago murder Capitols, having what amounts to mass shootings every week / weekend?

Why do Democrats support BLM yet turn a blind eye / not give a shit about black on black crime / shootings / homicides in these Democrat-run cities?

Why are Dem-run cities such shit holes where crime is out of control, shop lifting is mot even worth the cops' time because the criminals aren't charged anymore, where homeless camps overrun cities, used drug needles lie around on sidewalks / kids' parks / etc..., where people are allowed to shit on rhe sidewalk....and descent Americans are fleeing these cities now?

Why have Democrats been allowed to elevate themselves above the laws they make for others abd which they demand is enforced on OTHERS?

 

[Rigby5]

You are so freaking clueless.

You didn't know that Iraq and Iran had a history of hostility going back half a century at least.

Ambassador Glaspie DID NOT give Iraq permission to invade Kuwait. Lacking instructions to the contrary she simply told Iraq that the U.S. had no position on their dispute with Kuwait (which we didn't).

You are so amusing. Almost as amusing as when you got the year of the Cuban Missile Crisis wrong by two years.

Iraq is mostly Shiite and Iran is almost entirely Shiite, so there is no basis for conflict between Iraq and Iran.
They were both US allies until 1979 when Iran turned against us.
They do NOT have a history of significant hostility.

Ambassador Glaspie said the US would not care about how Saddam wanted to handle the oil thefts by Kuwait.
He would not have acted against US wishes, so it is we who turned on him, not the other way around.

 

[Dayton3]

Iraq is mostly Shiite and Iran is almost entirely Shiite, so there is no basis for conflict between Iraq and Iran.
They were both US allies until 1979 when Iran turned against us.
They do NOT have a history of significant hostility.

Ambassador Glaspie said the US would not care about how Saddam wanted to handle the oil thefts by Kuwait.
He would not have acted against US wishes, so it is we who turned on him, not the other way around.

You forget something else.
A few years prior, the U.S. provided seed corn to Iraq, despite issuing warnings that the seed corn was coated with a deadly herbicide, thousands of Iraqis were poisoned by it after they ate it. IIRC hundreds died.

will provide a link in a moment.

1971 Iraq poison grain disaster - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[easyt65]

Wrong.
Congress can always only ratify a treaty AFTER the UN has passed it.
It could never have been just a unilateral deal by Obama because other countries were also involved.
And Congress did ratify it.

The President is not Constitutionally authorized to negotiate treaties - that is Congress' job, Comrade. Your ignorance of the US Constitution gives you away, Russian Troll.

The President is not allowed to present a 'treaty' that has not been voted on and passed by the US Congress tp the UN for ratification. Without Congress signing off on it / approving the Treaty it is an ILLEGITIMATE document due to the fact that the US govt has not voted on and ratified it.

Barry can not ignore the US Constitution and act as king, taking on the duties of Congress and President, despite the fact that is what he did.

You are an ignorant, lying Russian Troll spewing bullshit while claiming falsely that it is 'fact'.

Again, you have no credibility. Taking almost anything you post seriously is a waste of time.

You hate this country, think it is a terrorist state, is the worst country in the world, defend proven criminal / traitor Democrats, claim they have done and can do no wrong...

What a useless, lying, propaganda-pushing tit.

 

[Rigby5]

In order'

1) Because more people commit crimes in the U.S. Largely because we are a wealthy country so there is much more opportunity for criminals here.

2) We don't. Of the U.S. defense budget only a small fraction is spent on weapons. The largest portion is on personnel.

3) Invasion of the U.S. is far from the only reason to fight a war.


4) They don't. This has been proven over and over again.

5) Knocking gives criminals warning.

6) It costs too much.

7) Most things are not authorized by the U.S. Constitution and never will be.

Wrong.
1) wealthy countries usually have LESS crime, not more. Crime is caused by injustice. Like no unions, health care, etc.

2) whether we outspend the world on weapons or soldiers is not relevant. The point we are using force a lot more than a peaceful country would need to.

3) actually defense of invasion IS about the only reason to fight a war. There are a few others, like theft, murder, assassination, etc., but nothing like that happened. Wars the US fights, like the Spanish American War, WWI, Vietnam, Iraq, etc, are criminal attempts to take what is not ours, based on lies.

4) police do routinely murder unarmed Blacks all the time. I often see police illegally pointing firearms at unarmed people who have committed, no crime, and that is reckless endangerment at best.

5) does not matter if knocking gives criminals warning. The law is clear that you have to knock in order to legally serve a warrant. The only exception is hostage situations. Searches in order to FIND evidence, is illegal. You are not supposed to be given a warrant if you need to find evidence.

6) public health care, when paid by taxes, costs less than half what we are paying now. There is no excuse for not having public health care.

7) things not authorized by the constitution, like the DEA, BATF, Homeland Security, FDA, CDC, etc., are totally and completely illegal.

 

[Rigby5]

How is the "War on Drugs" illegal?

Agree on Hunter Biden though.

The monarchs of the Middle ages relied on the "power of the sword", also known as "might makes right", or "divine right".
The point of the revolutions against the monarchies is that we believe in a republic, where the ONLY source of legal authority is the defense if inherent individual rights.

So the problem is the War on Drugs does not defend the inherent rights of any individual.
Instead, it is trying to dictate what others should or should not do.
And there is no legal basis for that in a democratic republic.
The War on Drugs is totally and completely dictatorial.

 

[Rigby5]

Why are Soros-backed Democrat AGs putting revolving doors on police stations, letting thieves, rapists, pedophiles, and murderers out on the street as fast as they possibly can?

Why did / are Democrats support / supporting Defund the Police, turning Blue Cities into lawless zones?

Why are Blue-run cities like Chicago murder Capitols, having what amounts to mass shootings every week / weekend?

Why do Democrats support BLM yet turn a blind eye / not give a shit about black on black crime / shootings / homicides in these Democrat-run cities?

Why are Dem-run cities such shit holes where crime is out of control, shop lifting is mot even worth the cops' time because the criminals aren't charged anymore, where homeless camps overrun cities, used drug needles lie around on sidewalks / kids' parks / etc..., where people are allowed to shit on rhe sidewalk....and descent Americans are fleeing these cities now?

Why have Democrats been allowed to elevate themselves above the laws they make for others abd which they demand is enforced on OTHERS?

Because all Black on Black crime is pretty much the fault of the illegal war on drugs.
The war on drugs greatly increases drug prices and therefore profits.
That means great amounts of cash that can not be defended by police or banks.
That is going to ensure lots of turf wars and theft shoot outs.

 

[Rigby5]

You forget something else.
A few years prior, the U.S. provided seed corn to Iraq, despite issuing warnings that the seed corn was coated with a deadly herbicide, thousands of Iraqis were poisoned by it after they ate it. IIRC hundreds died.

will provide a link in a moment.

1971 Iraq poison grain disaster - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The US companies who use methylmercury as an herbicide, should be arrested.
You can't ever get rid of methylmercury, and it is about as deadly to humans as you can get.
And you certainly do NOT need any sort of fungicide in Iraq.

 

[Rigby5]

LOL what "anti-terrorist 'coalition' " ? Daffy duck
was a terrorist on his very own. It is true that
OTHER TERRORIST organizations (eg. Al Qaeda)
were able to step into the breach----and THAT IS
ANOTHER ISSUE

Wrong.
The rebels in Benghazi were mostly Islamic extremists trying to create violence, while Qaddafi was more of a secularist trying to reduce violence.
He only once tried to get revenge for the murder of his granddaughter by Reagan in the Gulf of Sidra incident.

 

[Rigby5]

Your empathy and concern for oppressive murderous dictators, terrorist countries, and enemies of the US are duly noted, snowflake.


View attachment 704682
TRIGGERED: 'The US is evil, one of the worst in the world...I hares it, precious!'

View attachment 704683

Wrong.
It is something called the "Rule of Law" and "Blind Justice".
It is how civilized people are supposed to live.
It works best.
What we are doing instead, is back to "Might makes Right", of the Dark Ages, which never works out very well for anyone.

 

[Dayton3]

Crime is caused by injustice. Like no unions, health care, etc.

Prove it. With links to an unquestionable source please.

 

[Dayton3]

Wrong.
The rebels in Benghazi were mostly Islamic extremists trying to create violence, while Qaddafi was more of a secularist trying to reduce violence.
He only once tried to get revenge for the murder of his granddaughter by Reagan in the Gulf of Sidra incident.

Collateral damage isn't "murder".

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Why would ANYONE trust the USA on anything when the next President can just rip up your trade deals and slap tariffs on everything??

Trump showed how unreliable the USA really is.

Your deflection is noted

 

[Dayton3]

Wrong.
It is something called the "Rule of Law" and "Blind Justice".
It is how civilized people are supposed to live.
It works best.
What we are doing instead, is back to "Might makes Right", of the Dark Ages, which never works out very well for anyone.

I wish you would develop a little more enthusiasm for the U.S. attacking other countries.

Don't you have any loyalty at all to the United States?

 

[easyt65]

Wrong.
It is something called the "Rule of Law" and "Blind Justice".
It is how civilized people are supposed to live.
It works best.
What we are doing instead, is back to "Might makes Right", of the Dark Ages, which never works out very well for anyone.

Sure, Comrade, whatever you say...

So Hillary Clinton initiating the feed Tussian Coup / Scandal, tbe Obama administration running it despite knowing it was all bullshit, the rogue FBI viating the Constitution, violating laws, defrauding the FISA Court. Violating the Patriot Act AT least a dozen times, illegally spying on Americans and a sitting US President, Democrats conducting illegal failed coup Impeachment attempts based on zero crime / evidence / witnesses, and being exposed for attempting to criminally manufacturing and using false evidence in an attempt to overthrow the US hovt by illegally removing a sitting President - all because they held the majority (Presidency, House, and Senate) and wielded tbe power by numbers to fo all of this without opposition, checks, or balances....has not been criminally partisan abuse of power ... sedition, treason, etc.... criminally partisan 'Might Makes Right'?

Despite the Cinstitution requiring Impeachment be based on 'High Crimes and Misdemeanors', without a crime, evidence, or witnesses Speaker Pelosi was forced to defend the Drmocrats Impeachments by arguing crimes, evidence, nor witnessesxare needed to Impeach a President...

WTF? For such a violation of the Constitution, for such Abuse of Power, for such obvious partisan-based treason, Pelosi should have been stripped of her Speaker position and perp-walked out of the House in chains for Sedition, Conspiracy, Treason...for starters.

Of course you spew all this bullshit then argue how none of it applies to Democrats because they have done nothing wrong and ate incapable of doing so.

Bwuhahahahahaha

 

[Soupnazi630]

It not only was immoral to cause the collapse of the USSR, since they had not harmed anyone, but it was incredibly stupid.
Gorbachev was their leader, and was far more moral and trustworthy than Reagan.
The world would be a much better place if the USSR had not gone bankrupt by Reagan.

Wrong.

The USSR was the most bloody dictatorship n human histyory. Their communist governnment slaughtered more than Hitler did in the holocaust.

It was a moral and ethical good thing to destroy them

Gobachev was a communist monster.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Reagan has no ethical reason to cause the economic collapse of the USSR.
They were not invading, murdering, harming, etc.
And in fact, with Gorbachov in power, the USSR could easily have become our best ally.

The most ethical and moral politcal act ever done was to engineer the destruction of the USSR

It was a communist country which is the most evil form of government and it was a righteous act to destroy them

Yes they were invading other nations and enslaving millions

 

[dudmuck]

Wrong.

The USSR was the most bloody dictatorship n human histyory. Their communist governnment slaughtered more than Hitler did in the holocaust.

It was a moral and ethical good thing to destroy them

Gobachev was a communist monster.

The Top-10 Most Evil Leaders of the 20th Century

By Jan-Benedict Steenkamp The 20th century is the most violent century in history. While this century witnessed many great leaders, such as Franklin D.

www.linkedin.com

nope, Stalin ranks 3rd.

 

[Soupnazi630]

ACTUALLY, Saddam was our best ally and did whatever we wanted.
We wanted him to attack Iran, so he did it.
Almost lost, and gained nothing, but he did it anyway because we wanted him to.
When Kuwait was stealing his oil and making Iraq go bankrupt, he even asked ambassador Glaspie for permission before moving troops into Kuwait.
It was the US that betrayed Saddam, not the other way around.

Absoolute lies.

Npo one asked Gillespie for anything and no one stole their oil