Zone1 Why was Jesus crucified?

[ding]

the gov't is the people ... than when stolen by religious / political zealots - disguised as saviors and wanta be's.

Would you like for government to control prices, wages and profits?

How about income? Would you like for the government to provide you with your income?

I'm curious what you believe you are responsible for providing?

 

[JustAGuy1]

This is in response to the thread about why Jews reject Jesus as Messiah

Answer this question and you get your answer to the other thread.

After all, the rejection of Jesus by the Jewish leaders of the time of Jesus is why he was rejected by Jews today.

Because you and I are sinners.

 

[BackAgain]

There was no electric chair at the time.

 

[irosie91]

Rome was the legal authority in Israel and Jesus never broke Roman law.

Proof is in the fact that both Roman Governor Pontius Pilate (John 18:38) and Roman-appointed King Herod Antipas (Luke 23:6-12) could find “no guilt in Him.”- John 18.38 (NASB).

the book that Constantine--EMPEROR of ROME sponsored is not proof.
any more than the OT is PROOF of the parting of the red sea by the wave
of a stick in the hand of Moses-- In fact
important evidence is the FACT --(which I kinda believe) that Herod killed
John the mikveh man) Only an idiot would suggest that "DA JEWISH KING"
would kill a popular mikveh man on his daughter's WHIM. Jews
have been saying that publically for more than 2000 years. John the mikveh
man was killed for the SAME reason Jesus was---he was a Pharisee---despised
the ROMAN APPOINTED KING HEROD as much as Jesus THE PHARISEE hated
CAIAPHAS and Roman control of the TEMPLE. Try reading the book ---LOL
"LUKE" the greek who never met Jesus and did not even know aramaic.
UHM--the overturning of the tables OF THE ROMAN APPOINTED MO NEY
CHANGERS was an act of sedition against ROME.
The rejection by JOHN MIKVEH MAN of the Roman appointed
KING was an act of sedition against ROME. Being a "thief" was not an act of
sedition against Rome--Even if a jew murdered another jew---NOT AN ACT OF
SEDITION against rome and not a reason to CRUCIFY. LOL @ Matthew---the
despised and rejected TAX COLLECTOR FOR ROME (in more modern times KAPO)

 

[irosie91]

theft was not a reason for crucifixion unless it was theft of ROMAN PROPERTY

t

surada disagrees-----she seems to imagine that stealing an apple in the market
was a reason to CRUCIFY in Roman controlled Judea. -----very sad level of ignorance

 

[BreezeWood]

Would you like for government to control prices, wages and profits?

How about income? Would you like for the government to provide you with your income?

I'm curious what you believe you are responsible for providing?

the gov't is the people ... than when stolen by religious / political zealots - disguised as saviors and wanta be's.

truth is bing fears the gov't - if it is not what they, bing, the authoritarian theocrat demand for all the people - must be.

 

[irosie91]

truth is bing fears the gov't - if it is not what they, bing, the authoritarian theocrat demand for all the people - must be.

an interesting UTOPIAN "novel" ---"LOOKING BACKWARD" by Edward Bellamy----I read it---
well-----it was on the ASSIGNED READING LIST for my creme puff sociology course. I had
no problem reading so I read it-----it got me an 'A' -----that's how I got thru undergraduate
school-----simply because reading a book ----did not KILL me. I often wondered by so
many of my school mates REFUSED TO READ A SILLY LITTLE BOOK

 

[ding]

truth is bing fears the gov't - if it is not what they, bing, the authoritarian theocrat demand for all the people - must be.

But you didn't answer the questions. Are you a government cuck?

Do I fear the government? No. Should I?

 

[surada]

surada disagrees-----she seems to imagine that stealing an apple in the market
was a reason to CRUCIFY in Roman controlled Judea. -----very sad level of ignorance

What are you talking about?

 

[irosie91]

What are you talking about?

Nothing that an anglican who believes that the Jews of Roman controlled
Judea LACKED A JUDICIARY could possibly grasp

 

[surada]

Nothing that an anglican who believes that the Jews of Roman controlled
Judea LACKED A JUDICIARY could possibly grasp

All the Romans wanted was the temple tax. The money changers were Jews not Romans. Jesus broke no Roman laws.

Neither Herod Antipas or Pontius Pilate found Jesus guilty of anything.

 

[irosie91]

All the Romans wanted was the temple tax. The money changers were Jews not Romans. Jesus broke no Roman laws.

Neither Herod Antipas or Pontius Pilate found Jesus guilty of anything.

 

[irosie91]

Pay attention, cyberbuddies-----This is not the first time that the islamo nazi
propagandist farted "THEY WERE JEWS, ROSIE, NOT ROMANS" Pay attention
to the REPETITION of her shit mouth LIES. It is the GOEBBELS PRINCIPLE" --
"just fart out the same lie over and over......" The lie here is the implication
of the ISLAMO NAZI ---her claim that I said the money changers were ROMANS<<<
shit mouth episcopalian LIE. The islamo nazi follows that with----what she magically
"knows" to wit "All the Romans wanted was the temple tax" <<<more islamo nazi
shit. The TAX COLLECTORS had nothing to do with the temple tax---a very nominal
!/2 shekel per year-------The ROMANS EXTORTED TAXES on everything in and out and
around Judea thru their APPOINTED TAX COLLECTORS----the dregs and TRAITORS
of society. The nominal 1/2 shekel was more like something dropped in the sunday
collection plate-----nothing to do with ROMAN PIGS at all. Pay attention---you will get
insight into LOTS ----including the present day HAMAS/ISLAMO NAZI claims

 

[BreezeWood]

Nothing that an anglican who believes that the Jews of Roman controlled
Judea LACKED A JUDICIARY could possibly grasp

not true for their concerns, does 91 give the opinion the changers were not there w/ the blessings of the jewish court.

as the true objection made by jesus ... they, the jewish court regardless the changers had abandoned the true heavenly religion for political motivations. ... long since past.

whatever jesus was, they certainly were not a temple jew.

 

[irosie91]

not true for their concerns, does 91 give the opinion the changers were not there w/ the blessings of the jewish court.

as the true objection made by jesus ... they, the jewish court regardless the changers had abandoned the true heavenly religion for political motivations. ... long since past.

whatever jesus was, they certainly were not a temple jew.

breezie-----consult you own book for the myth you wish to propagate---the "changers" were
"in business' with the agreement of the Romans and their APPOINTEE TEMPLE OFFICIALS----
and the Roman appointed "King". No question---the king, the temple officials and their
shills abandoned "the religion" for political motivations. Not stick to the story on your own
personal GOLDEN PLATES

 

[BreezeWood]

Pay attention, cyberbuddies-----This is not the first time that the islamo nazi
propagandist ...

you're sadly obsessive - out of control ... a bar of soap will do wonders for your condition.

 

[surada]

Pay attention, cyberbuddies-----This is not the first time that the islamo nazi
propagandist farted "THEY WERE JEWS, ROSIE, NOT ROMANS" Pay attention
to the REPETITION of her shit mouth LIES. It is the GOEBBELS PRINCIPLE" --
"just fart out the same lie over and over......" The lie here is the implication
of the ISLAMO NAZI ---her claim that I said the money changers were ROMANS<<<
shit mouth episcopalian LIE. The islamo nazi follows that with----what she magically
"knows" to wit "All the Romans wanted was the temple tax" <<<more islamo nazi
shit. The TAX COLLECTORS had nothing to do with the temple tax---a very nominal
!/2 shekel per year-------The ROMANS EXTORTED TAXES on everything in and out and
around Judea thru their APPOINTED TAX COLLECTORS----the dregs and TRAITORS
of society. The nominal 1/2 shekel was more like something dropped in the sunday
collection plate-----nothing to do with ROMAN PIGS at all. Pay attention---you will get
insight into LOTS ----including the present day HAMAS/ISLAMO NAZI claims

Calm down and read the scriptures.

 

[irosie91]

you're sadly obsessive - out of control ... a bar of soap will do wonders for your condition.

you got the wrong diagnosis and pinned it on the wrong patient

 

[irosie91]

Calm down and read the scriptures.

I read lots of scriptural writings. You seem to claim that you have read some.
The only point that you made is an admission that you are a liar and hypocrite

 

[BreezeWood]

breezie-----consult you own book for the myth you wish to propagate---the "changers" were
"in business' with the agreement of the Romans and their APPOINTEE TEMPLE OFFICIALS----
and the Roman appointed "King". No question---the king, the temple officials and their
shills abandoned "the religion" for political motivations. Not stick to the story on your own
personal GOLDEN PLATES

- that would include you as the issue involves the motivation of the person jesus the jews ultimately murdered - and your denial of history.