Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Lordy, lordy, you dumb fuck, in another thread you just claimed that the Milankovitch Cycles did not cause climate change, and that coral reefs were not limestone. The thread is 'Global warming is becoming global cooling', post #127, you denied that coral reefs were limestone, and that there are major units of limestone formed from ancient coral reefs, as per post #132. In post #128, same thread, you said the Milankovitch Cycles did not cause climate change. Continental glaciers south of the US and Canadian border are not climate change? LOL Yessirreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Bob, what a Phd Geologist.
The main drawback to thorium is that it cannot be made into nuclear weapons.Thorium is an element. A thorium reactor has been promised for decades, how many more decade in coming, and how expensive will it be?
This is fucking hilarious. You, like a lot of other lying assholes, have constantly used the amount of CO2 emitted from the atmosphere to say that nature is emitting more CO2 than man, while totally ignoring that the ocean absorbs a greater amount than it emits. So the limestone in the coral reefs is a product of atmospheric CO2. Care to provide any articles in a scientific journal that states the Milankovitch Cycle is not the primary driver of the glacial cycles?Coral reefs are a biogenic limestone, that is true, however I am only referring to the limestone precipitated from the atmosphere, and no one knows what causes the glacial cycles. The Milankovitch Cycles may, but we don't KNOW for sure. There are problems with the theory. And that is the difference between a scientist, me, and a doofus, you.
I present facts, both for and against, and you present cherry picked evidence only.
www.sciencedirect.com
This is fucking hilarious. You, like a lot of other lying assholes, have constantly used the amount of CO2 emitted from the atmosphere to say that nature is emitting more CO2 than man, while totally ignoring that the ocean absorbs a greater amount than it emits. So the limestone in the coral reefs is a product of atmospheric CO2. Care to provide any articles in a scientific journal that states the Milankovitch Cycle is not the primary driver of the glacial cycles?
Abstract
Dynamical instabilities in the glaciation and deglaciation of the ice sheets can be triggered by pulsations of the rate of change of the orbital and rotational parameters. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that the Milankovitch glaciation cycles are extremely sensitive to the rate of change of the obliquity frequency. The first of our three contributions is a pedagogic principle of dynamical instability which provides a scientific basis for the driving mechanism of the glaciation cycles. The second contribution is a clarification of the origin and climate significance of the obliquity related 100 kyr cycle in terms of nonlinear coupling between various orbital and rotational parameters. Finally, the fluctuations in the size of the ice sheets are computed using the Weertman-Birchfield-Watts model of ice sheets. It is demonstrated that the growth and decay of the width of the ice sheets are in good agreement with the variations in the continental ice volume as seen in the late Pleistocene δ18O record.
A new view on the driving mechanism of Milankovitch glaciation cycles
Dynamical instabilities in the glaciation and deglaciation of the ice sheets can be triggered by pulsations of the rate of change of the orbital and r…
Just one of many confirming the influence of the Milankovitch Cycles.
A bit simplistic and silly, but with some very good points;
Quite the opposite, westwall supports nuclear fusion and realises it's future. You're trying to harness nuclear fusion by inefficient unreliable polluting means.Oh yes, more denial by a denier. However, one with zero influence on the future.
