The question was raised in Brett Baier’s interview with the Ukrainian foreign minister yesterday on TV.
# This diplomatic activity manifested in security assurances for Ukraine embedded in what has become known as
the Budapest Memorandum. With the entrance of Ukraine into the international order as a non-nuclear state,
Russia, the U.S. and the U.K. pledged to “respect the independence and sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine.” The memo reaffirmed their obligation to “refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine.” The signatories also reaffirmed their commitment to “seek immediate” UN Security Council action “to provide assistance to Ukraine … if Ukraine should become a victim of an act of aggression.” These assurances upheld obligations contained in the
U.N. charter and the
1975 Helsinki Final Act.
Ukraine, in turn, gave up the nuclear weapons within its borders,
sending them to Russia for dismantling.
In light of Russia’s annexation of Crimea and its current threat to Ukrainian sovereignty, it’s fair to ask: What is the significance now of the Budapest Memorandum?
As Russia threatens to invade Ukraine, Ukrainians wonder about the worth of a 1994 agreement signed by Russia, the US and the UK, who promised to protect the newly independent state’s sovereignty.
theconversation.com