We’re not discussing hope, we’re discussing belief, both in the literal and epistemic sense.Hope is the belief you can do what you think you cant do and then you do it. Or you might fail and learn from your mistake. You have to account for the dominant role emotions play in how we think. Emotions determine what you think you know and believe and for most people they have no idea what drives them. The Limbic system controls emotion and is the most powerful brain system. It can talk over all control. The prefrontal cortex which is rational thinking is weak in comparison. We can prove this with active scans and its always been well kwon in in psychology.
I don’t deny that humans have deep psychological drives, or that emotion influences cognition. That’s well-known. But the existence of a psychological need doesn’t make a belief warranted. It only explains why people want to believe something, not whether the belief is true or justified.
And none of the arguments presented so far address the actual question of epistemic warrant.
They explain why belief feels compelling, not why the belief is reliable.
That’s the distinction I’m making.
Nya na nana naa. Grow a set of balls. It is written. "No one whose balls have been crushed can be a member of the assembly of the Lord."