I don’t know? I’ve not paid attention to who the hucksters are. I didn’t think my post was ambiguous. We’re not going to get anywhere with new taxes if spending isn’t cut first. That’s all i had to say.Have you voted for Supply Side Hucksters?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don’t know? I’ve not paid attention to who the hucksters are. I didn’t think my post was ambiguous. We’re not going to get anywhere with new taxes if spending isn’t cut first. That’s all i had to say.Have you voted for Supply Side Hucksters?
I find that it is almost always the scolds who add fuel to that fire.I don’t know? I’ve not paid attention to who the hucksters are. I didn’t think my post was ambiguous. We’re not going to get anywhere with new taxes if spending isn’t cut first. That’s all i had to say.
Grownups can grasp the difference between "revenues that would-have-been without the tax cuts" and "revenues". It's not difficult. A grade-schooler can grasp it, but every conservative on this thread fails at it. This illustrates why no conservative should be allowed near the presidency -- all conservatives fail at basic economics.How do they make our deficits when revenues go up, Halfwit?
Excuse me? It’s not only republicans who was the one who wanted to give billions to the arts and send millions to countries like Afghanistan to promote gender studies? Who was the party that wanted to give billion dollars to the arts? Meanwhile, they as the employees were going to get the stimulus check but no you guys wanted to push the envelope because if trump didn’t sign it then you guys would cry about it! Oh yeah which party said no on giving people a 1 million dollar stimulus check!
Are you referring to the checks to Americans that were delayed while they figured out how to put Grifty's signature on them?Meanwhile, they as the employees were going to get the stimulus check but no you guys wanted to push the envelope because if trump didn’t sign it then you guys would cry about it!
Please stop, Toddster...
This is tiresome.
President Bush requested $481.4 billion in discretional spending for the Department of Defense’s 2008 budget. That figure does not include any of the spending for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, which have been paid for primarily through “emergency supplemental requests” that are not included in the federal budget’s accounting.
Iraq, Afghanistan, and the U.S. Economy
Toddster,not included in the federal budget’s accounting.
Not included in the budget doesn't mean "not spent, not borrowed, not added to the debt".
Sorry, I know liberals are bad at math.
Toddster,
If it isn't included in the budget, it isn't part of the BUDGET deficit..
That is not the same as suggesting that it isn't owed.
How many times, ToddIf it isn't included in the budget, it isn't part of the BUDGET deficit..
Prove it.
How many times, Todd
not included in the federal budget’s accounting
No...it's "Emergency Supplemental Appropriation".Supplement to the budget. Why do you feel that doesn't add to spending, doesn't add to deficit?
Much as you will disputed these points, they are, never the less, FACT.Grownups can grasp the difference between "revenues that would-have-been without the tax cuts" and "revenues". It's not difficult. A grade-schooler can grasp it, but every conservative on this thread fails at it. This illustrates why no conservative should be allowed near the presidency -- all conservatives fail at basic economics.
---Bush tax cuts - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office has consistently reported that the Bush tax cuts did not pay for themselves and represented a sizable decline in revenue for the Treasury:
This is where all conservatives now shriek that facts are a liberal conspiracy. Please, proceed. After all, when the facts contradict you, what else can you do?
- The CBO estimated in June 2012 that the Bush tax cuts of 2001 (EGTRRA) and 2003 (JGTRRA) added approximately $1.5 trillion total to the debt over the 2002–2011 decade, excluding interest.
- The CBO estimated in January 2009 that the Bush tax cuts would add approximately $3.0 trillion to the debt over the 2010–2019 decade if fully extended at all income levels, including interest.
- The CBO estimated in January 2009 that extending the Bush tax cuts at all income levels over the 2011–2019 period would increase the annual deficit by an average of 1.7% GDP, reaching 2.0% GDP in 2018 and 2019.
No...it's "Emergency Supplemental Appropriation".
I haven't said that it doesn't add to spending..
I said that, until FY2010, ESAs for Iraqnam were not included in the reported deficit, specifically that of the federal budget.
Cause he was gaslightingso how is there more revenue now than there was before?
Why can’t they cut spending?I guess if you think the deficit doesn’t matter then have fun with that lol
Define their “fair share”. Give us the % of the total tax bill the top 1% should pay. Top 10%.No.
We think the wealthy ought to pay their share.
Corporate welfare and tax loopholes and evasion by the rich (like Donald Trump only paying $700 in taxes) is bleeding this country dry!
Supplement to the budget. Why do you feel that doesn't add to spending, doesn't add to deficit?
If it isn't included in the budget, it isn't part of the BUDGET deficit..
That is not the same as suggesting that it isn't owed.
Revenues went up, Stupid.Dude, can you understand plain English? That money has to be paid back with interest. Are you stupid?
Who is "they"?Why can’t they cut spending?