Why does evil exist?

[BreezeWood]

good and evil are human constructs and do not exist outside of the human experience

.
that is not true, all beings display similarity in constructs of behavior with a deference for definitive results.

which beings? non humans?

.

which beings? non humans?

.
all physiological beings, fauna and flora - exhibit the same equivalencies of rational justification for their life pursuits. good vs evil - right vs wrong.

a pursuit of spiritual liberation for some far exceeding humanity in fulfillment.

A dog is incapable of processing whether its behavior is "good" or "evil". A dog cannot rationalize its behavior.

Is a tree that casts shade on other trees preventing their growth "evil" ?

Good and evil do not exist outside of the human intellect. We have invented these concepts in our efforts to understand human behavior.

.

Is a tree that casts shade on other trees preventing their growth "evil" ?

.
flora is aware of the conditions they create by their mere existence and use their authority over that for their own particular purpose. and yes some do appear to have evil or selfish intent.
.

.
were you to know, the mighty oak will not encroach other trees and often is the subject of withering and (voluntarily) perishes as a result.

 

[Blues Man]

good and evil are human constructs and do not exist outside of the human experience

.
that is not true, all beings display similarity in constructs of behavior with a deference for definitive results.

which beings? non humans?

.

which beings? non humans?

.
all physiological beings, fauna and flora - exhibit the same equivalencies of rational justification for their life pursuits. good vs evil - right vs wrong.

a pursuit of spiritual liberation for some far exceeding humanity in fulfillment.

A dog is incapable of processing whether its behavior is "good" or "evil". A dog cannot rationalize its behavior.

Is a tree that casts shade on other trees preventing their growth "evil" ?

Good and evil do not exist outside of the human intellect. We have invented these concepts in our efforts to understand human behavior.

.

Is a tree that casts shade on other trees preventing their growth "evil" ?

.
flora is aware of the conditions they create by their mere existence and use their authority over that for their own particular purpose. and yes some do appear to have evil or selfish intent.
.
View attachment 438391
.
were you to know, the mighty oak will not encroach other trees and often is the subject of withering and (voluntarily) perishes as a result.

Ok now you have to show me scientific evidence that trees are aware and act with intent.

 

[BreezeWood]

good and evil are human constructs and do not exist outside of the human experience

.
that is not true, all beings display similarity in constructs of behavior with a deference for definitive results.

which beings? non humans?

.

which beings? non humans?

.
all physiological beings, fauna and flora - exhibit the same equivalencies of rational justification for their life pursuits. good vs evil - right vs wrong.

a pursuit of spiritual liberation for some far exceeding humanity in fulfillment.

A dog is incapable of processing whether its behavior is "good" or "evil". A dog cannot rationalize its behavior.

Is a tree that casts shade on other trees preventing their growth "evil" ?

Good and evil do not exist outside of the human intellect. We have invented these concepts in our efforts to understand human behavior.

.

Is a tree that casts shade on other trees preventing their growth "evil" ?

.
flora is aware of the conditions they create by their mere existence and use their authority over that for their own particular purpose. and yes some do appear to have evil or selfish intent.
.
View attachment 438391
.
were you to know, the mighty oak will not encroach other trees and often is the subject of withering and (voluntarily) perishes as a result.

Ok now you have to show me scientific evidence that trees are aware and act with intent.

.

Ok now you have to show me scientific evidence that trees are aware and act with intent.

.
not sure what issue you are attempting to make -
.

.
nothing alive is without awareness and intent, have you an example.

 

[Blues Man]

good and evil are human constructs and do not exist outside of the human experience

.
that is not true, all beings display similarity in constructs of behavior with a deference for definitive results.

which beings? non humans?

.

which beings? non humans?

.
all physiological beings, fauna and flora - exhibit the same equivalencies of rational justification for their life pursuits. good vs evil - right vs wrong.

a pursuit of spiritual liberation for some far exceeding humanity in fulfillment.

A dog is incapable of processing whether its behavior is "good" or "evil". A dog cannot rationalize its behavior.

Is a tree that casts shade on other trees preventing their growth "evil" ?

Good and evil do not exist outside of the human intellect. We have invented these concepts in our efforts to understand human behavior.

.

Is a tree that casts shade on other trees preventing their growth "evil" ?

.
flora is aware of the conditions they create by their mere existence and use their authority over that for their own particular purpose. and yes some do appear to have evil or selfish intent.
.
View attachment 438391
.
were you to know, the mighty oak will not encroach other trees and often is the subject of withering and (voluntarily) perishes as a result.

Ok now you have to show me scientific evidence that trees are aware and act with intent.

.

Ok now you have to show me scientific evidence that trees are aware and act with intent.

.
not sure what issue you are attempting to make -
.
View attachment 438931
.
nothing alive is without awareness and intent, have you an example.

it is your assertion that a tree can choose the way it acts and therefore can not only act with intent but that it can also rationalize those acts which is why a tree is capable of evil.

Where is the scientific proof that trees can actually think and act with intent?

 

[BreezeWood]

good and evil are human constructs and do not exist outside of the human experience

.
that is not true, all beings display similarity in constructs of behavior with a deference for definitive results.

which beings? non humans?

.

which beings? non humans?

.
all physiological beings, fauna and flora - exhibit the same equivalencies of rational justification for their life pursuits. good vs evil - right vs wrong.

a pursuit of spiritual liberation for some far exceeding humanity in fulfillment.

A dog is incapable of processing whether its behavior is "good" or "evil". A dog cannot rationalize its behavior.

Is a tree that casts shade on other trees preventing their growth "evil" ?

Good and evil do not exist outside of the human intellect. We have invented these concepts in our efforts to understand human behavior.

.

Is a tree that casts shade on other trees preventing their growth "evil" ?

.
flora is aware of the conditions they create by their mere existence and use their authority over that for their own particular purpose. and yes some do appear to have evil or selfish intent.
.
View attachment 438391
.
were you to know, the mighty oak will not encroach other trees and often is the subject of withering and (voluntarily) perishes as a result.

Ok now you have to show me scientific evidence that trees are aware and act with intent.

.

Ok now you have to show me scientific evidence that trees are aware and act with intent.

.
not sure what issue you are attempting to make -
.
View attachment 438931
.
nothing alive is without awareness and intent, have you an example.

it is your assertion that a tree can choose the way it acts and therefore can not only act with intent but that it can also rationalize those acts which is why a tree is capable of evil.

Where is the scientific proof that trees can actually think and act with intent?

.

it is your assertion that a tree can choose the way it acts and therefore can not only act with intent but that it can also rationalize those acts which is why a tree is capable of evil.

.
the assertion is all physiological beings rationalize and are capable of evil, and to liberate their spirits it is required to triumph over evil to do so ... or, like you -
.

Where is the scientific proof that trees can actually think and act with intent?

.
perish in foolishness.

- the proof was provided. where is your rebuttal. to the evidence.

 

[Blues Man]

good and evil are human constructs and do not exist outside of the human experience

.
that is not true, all beings display similarity in constructs of behavior with a deference for definitive results.

which beings? non humans?

.

which beings? non humans?

.
all physiological beings, fauna and flora - exhibit the same equivalencies of rational justification for their life pursuits. good vs evil - right vs wrong.

a pursuit of spiritual liberation for some far exceeding humanity in fulfillment.

A dog is incapable of processing whether its behavior is "good" or "evil". A dog cannot rationalize its behavior.

Is a tree that casts shade on other trees preventing their growth "evil" ?

Good and evil do not exist outside of the human intellect. We have invented these concepts in our efforts to understand human behavior.

.

Is a tree that casts shade on other trees preventing their growth "evil" ?

.
flora is aware of the conditions they create by their mere existence and use their authority over that for their own particular purpose. and yes some do appear to have evil or selfish intent.
.
View attachment 438391
.
were you to know, the mighty oak will not encroach other trees and often is the subject of withering and (voluntarily) perishes as a result.

Ok now you have to show me scientific evidence that trees are aware and act with intent.

.

Ok now you have to show me scientific evidence that trees are aware and act with intent.

.
not sure what issue you are attempting to make -
.
View attachment 438931
.
nothing alive is without awareness and intent, have you an example.

it is your assertion that a tree can choose the way it acts and therefore can not only act with intent but that it can also rationalize those acts which is why a tree is capable of evil.

Where is the scientific proof that trees can actually think and act with intent?

.

it is your assertion that a tree can choose the way it acts and therefore can not only act with intent but that it can also rationalize those acts which is why a tree is capable of evil.

.
the assertion is all physiological beings rationalize and are capable of evil, and to liberate their spirits it is required to triumph over evil to do so ... or, like you -
.

Where is the scientific proof that trees can actually think and act with intent?

.
perish in foolishness.

- the proof was provided. where is your rebuttal. to the evidence.

You said all beings and included flora and fauna are aware and can are capable of intent and rationalization but you have provided no proof