Why are you against universal health care?

[Hector12]

No. AI will tell me, after you copy/paste.

I document my assertions.

 

[Hector12]

Fact: After Reagan's tax cuts, per capita GDP rose and unemployment declined.

View attachment 1203364


View attachment 1203366

 

[M14 Shooter]

Reagan's tax cuts for the rich...

Why do you refuse to admit you believe Reagan's tax cuts created years of strong economic growth, brought the US full employment, and almost eliminated inflation?

 

[M14 Shooter]

I document my assertions.

Then you need to cite the AI bot you use.

 

[M14 Shooter]

View attachment 1203668

This does nothing to address, much less negate the fact you believe Reagan's tax cuts created years of strong economic growth, brought the US full employment, and almost eliminated inflation.

 

[Hector12]

Why do you refuse to admit you believe Reagan's tax cuts created years of strong economic growth, brought the US full employment, and almost eliminated inflation?

I have already answered that.

 

[Concerned American]

Reagan's tax cuts for the rich and his increases in military spending tripled the national debt, and taught Republicans to do that whenever they have the power to do so.

The deficit surpassed $1T for the first time in history during Reagan's terms. There have been six POTUS's since and the deficit is 38 times that number in a mere 38 years. Hmmmm, what does that say about CONGRESSIONAL spending since then? 210 years, $1T. 38 years, $38T. I don't think Reagan is the problem.

 

[Hector12]

This does nothing to address, much less negate the fact you believe Reagan's tax cuts created years of strong economic growth, brought the US full employment, and almost eliminated inflation.

I have already explained why I do not like Reagan. He tripled the national debt. only 20% of the country benefitted from any national debt. The richest 1% benefitted the most.

 

[Hector12]

The deficit surpassed $1T for the first time in history during Reagan's terms. There have been six POTUS's since and the deficit is 38 times that number in a mere 38 years. Hmmmm, what does that say about CONGRESSIONAL spending since then? 210 years, $1T. 38 years, $38T. I don't think Reagan is the problem.

That is because whenever Republicans have the power, they cut taxes for the rich and raise military spending. Reagan taught Republicans they could get away with that.

 

[M14 Shooter]

I have already answered that.

You're lying.
You -refuse- to admit you believe Reagan's tax cuts created years of strong economic growth, brought the US full employment, and almost eliminated inflation and you have not once done so.
Disagree?
Cite the post and copy/paste the text to that effect.

 

[M14 Shooter]

I have already explained why I do not like Reagan

Because you dislike years of strong economic growth, full US employment, and almost zero inflation?
How is this at all a rational position?

 

[M14 Shooter]

Reagan taught Republicans they could get away with that.

Reagan taught you tax cuts created years of strong economic growth, brought the US full employment, and almost eliminated inflation.

 

[Hector12]

You're lying.
You -refuse- to admit you believe Reagan's tax cuts created years of strong economic growth, brought the US full employment, and almost eliminated inflation and you have not once done so.
Disagree?
Cite the post and copy/paste the text to that effect.

How many times to I have to repeat myself? The strong economic growth went to the rich and the nearly rich. Reagan tripled the national debt and cut back on environmental protection.

 

[Concerned American]

Reagan tripled the national debt and cut back on environmental protection.

The US debt was <$80B under Carter's final budget. Reagan took it to over $1T--that is more than a 10x increase. Just sayin' However, he is not responsible for the 380X increase since Carter. You seem to disregard this. Congressional spending is the cause of this ridiculous debt---Congress holds the purse strings.

 

[M14 Shooter]

How many times to I have to repeat myself? The strong economic growth went to the rich and the nearly rich.

You can't repeat yourself because you haven't once said this.
And you certainly haven't done anything to prove it.

But, you go right ahead and hate strong growth, low unemployment and low inflation - see who agrees with you.
Fact remains: You believe Regan's tax cuts brought all of these things.

 

[M14 Shooter]

The US debt was <$80B under Carter's final budget. Reagan took it to over $1T--that is more than a 10x increase.

US debt, end FY1981: $789.4B
US debt, end FY1988: $2051.6B That's 1594.2 in 1981 dollars. Less than double.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Military families have UHC.

Not really.

 

[Hector12]

The US debt was <$80B under Carter's final budget. Reagan took it to over $1T--that is more than a 10x increase. Just sayin' However, he is not responsible for the 380X increase since Carter. You seem to disregard this. Congressional spending is the cause of this ridiculous debt---Congress holds the purse strings.

Republican Presidents and Congressional Republicans are responsible for the increase in the rise in the national debt.

 

[Hector12]

You can't repeat yourself because you haven't once said this.
And you certainly haven't done anything to prove it.

But, you go right ahead and hate strong growth, low unemployment and low inflation - see who agrees with you.
Fact remains: You believe Regan's tax cuts brought all of these things.

 

[Hector12]

M14 Shooter,

Universal health care gets better results for less money than the American system. The economic growth of the Reagan Administration went to the richest 20% of the U.S. population and mainly to the richest 1% of the U.S. population. Tax cuts for the rich are responsible for the increase in the national debt that Republicans are using in efforts to cut popular domestic spending programs.

You can jump up and down, wave your arms and shout. You can't deny the truth of what I have posted.