Exactly. Only when it's truly necessary that everyone follow the same policy.
WTF do you think why laws and policies are created for?
Take your stop sign example. If there are no rules around right away at intersection, it becomes a chaotic, dangerous clusterfuck.
See above.
In that case, it's necessary for us to all agree a common set of rules and follow them. If we're going to share the public roads (the commons), it's necessary.
On the other hand, Democrats are zealously lobbying for the government to take over health insurance. They want to force everyone into the same insurance company, run by government. That's simply not necessary (and gives government far too much power).
So, instead, you want the very same power to remain, as is, for-profit insurance companies?
Where the bottom line is profit, not healthcare.
There isn't ONE country in the world with universal healthcare, that are even thinking of changing to the US model.
Why do you think that is?
We can let people go their own way, decide for themselves, how they want to finance their healthcare. It shouldn't be up to majority rule.
That's working so well...................................NOT.
It's that way with most social problems. We don't need, and shouldn't want, government forcing conformity in all cases. Freedom is a good thing.
Healthcare isn't a social issue.
Yep. They're just as bad. Does that make you feel better?
You really can't break out of your two-party fixation, can you?
WTF?
What are the predominant political parties in the US?
Don't feign stupidity (hoping it's a feint, at least).
Or, well. Ok. I'll spell it out for you. Again.
Let's say Democrats get their druthers and pass single payer health insurance - such that we're all forced to pay for insurance, run by the state. Then, Republicans take Congress, and the White House, and go to town cutting coverage of things they don't approve of (abortion, birth-control, mental health, anything related to sexuality, etc, etc ....). And you're stuck with "insurance" that doesn't pay for health care services that you consider vital.
Not single-payer.................Universal.
If people wanted extra services, they would purchase extra insurance for some services.
If insurance were still a free market, and your insurance company tried to make these changes, you could tell them get fucked, maybe even sue them if they tried to change the policy mid-stream.
Yeah, good luck with that.
Companies change insurance all the time, you can't sue them for that, they have a right to change the insurance coverage of their employees.
You want to sue insurance companies because they dropped you?
You want to force insurance companies to cover your issue?
Should have read the fine print.
Then what happens when you do tell them to get fucked, change insurers and they don't cover pre-existing conditions?
Are you going to sue the hospital too?
Insurance companies aren't covering out-of-network doctors doing surgeries, exams, and medical procedures.
You get a co-pay for what you thought was an in-network procedure, then get an extra bill for an out-of-network doctor for $4000 or $5000, too paltry for a lawyer to take up.
But if government is running the show, you have no such option. You're stuck with whatever the Republicans hand you. You can wait another for years and cast a vote for someone who will (maybe) turn things back your way. But that's mighty weak tea and doesn't address your immediate health care needs.
Correct............................that's exactly what we have now.
Overpriced, poor quality, a massive-profit healthcare system that is number 1 in cost, number 12 in the world for a successful medical outcome.
Jeez... you partisans are really a one-trick pony. What would your excuse be if the Republicans weren't there?
Right, TRYING to portray yourself as nonpartisan, while regurgitating republican/FOX talking points?