Why all the crickets??????

So you been smoking with Marc I see.

What is not true?

Bush chased the Taliban out and then allowed them to reestablish because he pulled US troops away to fight in Iraq. Do you deny that?

You seem to not have a problem with what Obamush is doing why do you havea problem with Bush afterall Obamush is doing the same thing Bush did.

You know, that nonsense may fly with your fellow rightwing nutjobs...but makes no sense

Bush policy was to go to Iraq and chase imaginary threats while leaving Afghanistan to a patchwork force.

Obama campaigned for a revised strategy and pulled back US Iraq forces so he could plus up forces in Afghanistan. He specifically redirected the US strategy to go after terrorists in Pakistan with drone attacks and special forces. He has used NATO to provide multinational support in Afghanistan and Libya.

All of this is to correct the damage done by the Bush strategy
 
Are you all blind? This board is rife with people complaining about gas prices and heaping the blame on Obama. It's been rife with complaints about his handling of the wars. It's been rife with complaints about the Libya affair. But if this board has been less active recently, it's because the partisan hacks have temporarily run out of ammo, in the wake of the new birth certificate being released, and bin Laden's death. It's hard to spout out partisan sound bytes when your BS is so thoroughly debunked.

You missed the point.

I agree.When Bush was President if the price at the pump went up a penny the liberal media made sure the world knew about it.If unemployment went up .01 percentage point the media screamed about it. When some got jobs at McDonald's Nancy Pelosi's voice could be heard far and wide that these were not real jobs. Now McDonald's hires 62,000 and the unemployment numbers rise and Pelosi is preaching that the jobs market is improving dramatically.I thought burger flippers were the dregs of society.

You have to be an idiot if you don't see that this President is being given special treatment.And they brag about the fact that he will be unstoppable in the next election.Duh the media raises him higher on the pedestal every day.:confused:

"In here" doesn't mean jack shit; "out there" does and that's where it's silent.

That's false. You people are either lying or you don't really know what's in the programming of the media.

In fact, I'm not sure what any of you on the Right are really complaining about.

1. Is it that rightwing talk radio only dominates about 90% of AM talk radio?
2. Is it that Fox News isn't the ONLY cable news channel on television?
3. Is it that all cable news isn't conservatively slanted like Fox?
4. Is it that satellite radio has a liberal talk channel in addition to its conservative talk channel?
5. Is it that the internet allows too much freedom of speech from the Left?

Other than the usual non-specific childish crybaby piss and moan from the OP,

what exactly are you complaining about? How, specifically, would things have to change so you'd stop crying?

As you see, when you simply ask them to elaborate in detail what their complaints are, what do you get?

Stunned silence. More evidence that this 'liberal media' lament is little more than trolling.
 
So you been smoking with Marc I see.

What is not true?

Bush chased the Taliban out and then allowed them to reestablish because he pulled US troops away to fight in Iraq. Do you deny that?

You seem to not have a problem with what Obamush is doing why do you havea problem with Bush afterall Obamush is doing the same thing Bush did.
r


*

O.K., where's Lil' Dumbya's headlines?????

*

e980e_obama-campaign-poster_450x286.jpg


*

donald_trump.jpg


"Uh...uh...uh...uh...uh...uh...uh...uh......"​
 
Last edited:
What is not true?

Bush chased the Taliban out and then allowed them to reestablish because he pulled US troops away to fight in Iraq. Do you deny that?

You seem to not have a problem with what Obamush is doing why do you havea problem with Bush afterall Obamush is doing the same thing Bush did.
r


*

O.K., where's Lil' Dumbya's headlines?????

*

e980e_obama-campaign-poster_450x286.jpg

Stupid is gitmo closed?
do we still have troops in Iraq?
Has the patriot cat been repealed?
Has America stop invading countries?
Is America still bombing other countries?
Has the border been secured?
Bank Bailouts?
 
What is not true?

Bush chased the Taliban out and then allowed them to reestablish because he pulled US troops away to fight in Iraq. Do you deny that?

You seem to not have a problem with what Obamush is doing why do you havea problem with Bush afterall Obamush is doing the same thing Bush did.

You know, that nonsense may fly with your fellow rightwing nutjobs...but makes no sense

Bush policy was to go to Iraq and chase imaginary threats while leaving Afghanistan to a patchwork force.

Obama campaigned for a revised strategy and pulled back US Iraq forces so he could plus up forces in Afghanistan. He specifically redirected the US strategy to go after terrorists in Pakistan with drone attacks and special forces. He has used NATO to provide multinational support in Afghanistan and Libya.

All of this is to correct the damage done by the Bush strategy

Do we still have troops in Iraq? yes or no
 
When Bush was President, seemed like everyday you heard some ration of crap about how bad a President he was - especially for the Middle East wars. Now, you hardly ever hear anything about the wars at all. Has all the loud mouths gotten to hoarse to yell and scream? Could it be that if you are a Democratic President war is acceptable? Why all of the crickets? All I hear is crickets...

You really have to ask?

It is the Blatantly Biased, Liberal Democrat Supporting Press of course.

If McCain had won, and every day since had done Exactly what Obama had done. He would have been under attack the whole time from the entire Left wing Media Machine. Only Fox would be sticking up for the President.

The Big story this week would be Demanding Photo graphic Evidence of Osama's Demise. The Liberal Media would be beating home the point that we should question government and not just take their word for it. This Board will be filled with Posts, By the very same Liberal Hippocrates now saying take their word for it, Demanding proof, and engaging in all kinds of Conspiracy Speculation.

That is one of the things I have enjoyed about this Disastrous President. The Fact that so often in Supporting him, our Lefty pals in here have had to be exposed as the Disingenuous Hippocritical Assholes they are.

Think you're being a little tough on the universe of disingenuous hypocritical assholes of the world. What'd they ever do to be lumped in with lying lefties?
 
You seem to not have a problem with what Obamush is doing why do you havea problem with Bush afterall Obamush is doing the same thing Bush did.

You know, that nonsense may fly with your fellow rightwing nutjobs...but makes no sense

Bush policy was to go to Iraq and chase imaginary threats while leaving Afghanistan to a patchwork force.

Obama campaigned for a revised strategy and pulled back US Iraq forces so he could plus up forces in Afghanistan. He specifically redirected the US strategy to go after terrorists in Pakistan with drone attacks and special forces. He has used NATO to provide multinational support in Afghanistan and Libya.

All of this is to correct the damage done by the Bush strategy

Do we still have troops in Iraq? yes or no

LOL!!! Someone thinks this is a court room and we have to answer the way a lawyer would want us to. :cuckoo:
 
You know, that nonsense may fly with your fellow rightwing nutjobs...but makes no sense

Bush policy was to go to Iraq and chase imaginary threats while leaving Afghanistan to a patchwork force.

Obama campaigned for a revised strategy and pulled back US Iraq forces so he could plus up forces in Afghanistan. He specifically redirected the US strategy to go after terrorists in Pakistan with drone attacks and special forces. He has used NATO to provide multinational support in Afghanistan and Libya.

All of this is to correct the damage done by the Bush strategy

Do we still have troops in Iraq? yes or no

LOL!!! Someone thinks this is a court room and we have to answer the way a lawyer would want us to. :cuckoo:

I know how he'll tap dance around the question pretending to answer it. I want to know do we still have troops in Iraq? A simple yes we do have troops in Iraq or no we don't have troops inIraq will do.
 
I'm not sure how our still having troops in Iraq in any way alters the fact that GW Bush created a big mess there and left it for his successor to deal with.
 
Do we still have troops in Iraq? yes or no

LOL!!! Someone thinks this is a court room and we have to answer the way a lawyer would want us to. :cuckoo:

I know how he'll tap dance around the question pretending to answer it. I want to know do we still have troops in Iraq? A simple yes we do have troops in Iraq or no we don't have troops inIraq will do.

It's a rhetorical question. It doesn't require an answer. It's a question designed to make a point, not elicit an answer.
 
You know, that nonsense may fly with your fellow rightwing nutjobs...but makes no sense

Bush policy was to go to Iraq and chase imaginary threats while leaving Afghanistan to a patchwork force.

Obama campaigned for a revised strategy and pulled back US Iraq forces so he could plus up forces in Afghanistan. He specifically redirected the US strategy to go after terrorists in Pakistan with drone attacks and special forces. He has used NATO to provide multinational support in Afghanistan and Libya.

All of this is to correct the damage done by the Bush strategy

Do we still have troops in Iraq? yes or no

LOL!!! Someone thinks this is a court room and we have to answer the way a lawyer would want us to. :cuckoo:

gopSprouts.jpg
 
Do we still have troops in Iraq? yes or no

LOL!!! Someone thinks this is a court room and we have to answer the way a lawyer would want us to. :cuckoo:

I know how he'll tap dance around the question pretending to answer it. I want to know do we still have troops in Iraq? A simple yes we do have troops in Iraq or no we don't have troops inIraq will do.
Tough day, so far, huh?

midol.jpg


Everything's temporary.....​
 
I'm not sure how our still having troops in Iraq in any way alters the fact that GW Bush created a big mess there and left it for his successor to deal with.
.....Almost as if it was planned that way!!

:eusa_eh:

"The curious may want to know why the Bush tax cuts are set to expire in the first place. After all, if then-President George W. Bush and Congress thought they were a good idea when they passed them in the early 2000s, why make them temporary?

The answer is that President Bush and a complicit Congress didn’t want to show the magnitude of the deficits that would result from their tax cuts. To hide those deficits as they were pushing them through they used a variety of accounting tricks. One of those tricks was attaching expiration dates so that, on paper, there wouldn’t be any long-term costs. This made the long-term deficit picture look fairly rosy on paper even as it doomed Bush’s successor and the current Congress to cleaning up the mess."

 
One of the necessary myths of the right is the press is liberal, I defy anyone to show me stories on the state of the working poor in this nation, on the pathetic healthcare many Americans receive, on child poverty and piss poor education in the inner city, on hunger in America, or lousy pay and poor working conditions, on the outsourcing of work only for more money, or any number of issues. Media is corporate owned and operated and it is the same under Obama as it was under Bush. Corporations do not shoot their own.

More than likely because socialist/progressive liberoidal douchebags have put themselves in charge of these issues, and they're even worse than they were before they stuck in their big fat pinko noses.

You're right about one thing, though (even a blind squirrel...), you can be sure that the liberoidal lamestream media won't shoot their own.
 
You seem to not have a problem with what Obamush is doing why do you havea problem with Bush afterall Obamush is doing the same thing Bush did.

You know, that nonsense may fly with your fellow rightwing nutjobs...but makes no sense

Bush policy was to go to Iraq and chase imaginary threats while leaving Afghanistan to a patchwork force.

Obama campaigned for a revised strategy and pulled back US Iraq forces so he could plus up forces in Afghanistan. He specifically redirected the US strategy to go after terrorists in Pakistan with drone attacks and special forces. He has used NATO to provide multinational support in Afghanistan and Libya.

All of this is to correct the damage done by the Bush strategy

Do we still have troops in Iraq? yes or no

We sure do..

Which proves??
 
What is not true?

Bush chased the Taliban out and then allowed them to reestablish because he pulled US troops away to fight in Iraq. Do you deny that?

You seem to not have a problem with what Obamush is doing why do you havea problem with Bush afterall Obamush is doing the same thing Bush did.

You know, that nonsense may fly with your fellow rightwing nutjobs...but makes no sense

Bush policy was to go to Iraq and chase imaginary threats while leaving Afghanistan to a patchwork force.

Obama campaigned for a revised strategy and pulled back US Iraq forces so he could plus up forces in Afghanistan. He specifically redirected the US strategy to go after terrorists in Pakistan with drone attacks and special forces. He has used NATO to provide multinational support in Afghanistan and Libya.

All of this is to correct the damage done by the Bush strategy

Gotcha.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
You know, that nonsense may fly with your fellow rightwing nutjobs...but makes no sense

Bush policy was to go to Iraq and chase imaginary threats while leaving Afghanistan to a patchwork force.

Obama campaigned for a revised strategy and pulled back US Iraq forces so he could plus up forces in Afghanistan. He specifically redirected the US strategy to go after terrorists in Pakistan with drone attacks and special forces. He has used NATO to provide multinational support in Afghanistan and Libya.

All of this is to correct the damage done by the Bush strategy

Do we still have troops in Iraq? yes or no

LOL!!! Someone thinks this is a court room and we have to answer the way a lawyer would want us to. :cuckoo:

He's just trying to get you to answer a very simple question , rather than you going off on some fucking tangent that totally evades the question and ultimately involves you blaming Bush for everything from the price of eggs to universal disharmony.
 
One of the necessary myths of the right is the press is liberal, I defy anyone to show me stories on the state of the working poor in this nation, on the pathetic healthcare many Americans receive, on child poverty and piss poor education in the inner city, on hunger in America, or lousy pay and poor working conditions, on the outsourcing of work only for more money, or any number of issues. Media is corporate owned and operated and it is the same under Obama as it was under Bush. Corporations do not shoot their own.

More than likely because socialist/progressive liberoidal douchebags have put themselves in charge of these issues, and they're even worse than they were before they stuck in their big fat pinko noses.

barack_obama_birth_certificate_killing_osama_bin_laden.jpg


825.gif
 
Do we still have troops in Iraq? yes or no

LOL!!! Someone thinks this is a court room and we have to answer the way a lawyer would want us to. :cuckoo:

He's just trying to get you to answer a very simple question , rather than you going off on some fucking tangent that totally evades the question and ultimately involves you blaming Bush for everything from the price of eggs to universal disharmony.

The one question thy will refuse to answer, a question that only needs to be answered with yes or no.
 

Forum List

Back
Top