Why all the crickets??????

LOL!!! Someone thinks this is a court room and we have to answer the way a lawyer would want us to. :cuckoo:

I know how he'll tap dance around the question pretending to answer it. I want to know do we still have troops in Iraq? A simple yes we do have troops in Iraq or no we don't have troops inIraq will do.

It's a rhetorical question. It doesn't require an answer. It's a question designed to make a point, not elicit an answer.

Do we still have troops in Iraq? Yes or No?
 
LOL!!! Someone thinks this is a court room and we have to answer the way a lawyer would want us to. :cuckoo:

He's just trying to get you to answer a very simple question , rather than you going off on some fucking tangent that totally evades the question and ultimately involves you blaming Bush for everything from the price of eggs to universal disharmony.

The one question thy will refuse to answer, a question that only needs to be answered with yes or no.

Been answered..

And your reply? or should I say...non-reply?
 
LOL!!! Someone thinks this is a court room and we have to answer the way a lawyer would want us to. :cuckoo:

He's just trying to get you to answer a very simple question , rather than you going off on some fucking tangent that totally evades the question.....
You mean like birth-certificates????

handjob.gif

Derailing the thread? Fear of a question
Do we still have troops in Iraq?
 
He's just trying to get you to answer a very simple question , rather than you going off on some fucking tangent that totally evades the question and ultimately involves you blaming Bush for everything from the price of eggs to universal disharmony.

The one question thy will refuse to answer, a question that only needs to be answered with yes or no.

Been answered..

And your reply? or should I say...non-reply?

Do we still have troops in Iraq? Yes or no?
 
Crayon Boy said:
One of the necessary myths of the right is the press is liberal, I defy anyone to show me stories on the state of the working poor in this nation, on the pathetic healthcare many Americans receive, on child poverty and piss poor education in the inner city, on hunger in America, or lousy pay and poor working conditions, on the outsourcing of work only for more money, or any number of issues. Media is corporate owned and operated and it is the same under Obama as it was under Bush. Corporations do not shoot their own.

More than likely because socialist/progressive liberoidal douchebags have put themselves in charge of these issues, and they're even worse than they were before they stuck in their big fat pinko noses.

barack_obama_birth_certificate_killing_osama_bin_laden.jpg


825.gif
Who knew Osama was hiding in a sand trap at the Congressional Country Club?

BTW, nobody here said anything about a birth certificate, Danny Dickless derailer.
 
When Bush was President, seemed like everyday you heard some ration of crap about how bad a President he was - especially for the Middle East wars. Now, you hardly ever hear anything about the wars at all. Has all the loud mouths gotten to hoarse to yell and scream? Could it be that if you are a Democratic President war is acceptable? Why all of the crickets? All I hear is crickets...

What he(President Bush) did not get a ration of crap about was finding, killing or capturing the persons of person responsible for 9-11. What and when he received crap about was turning that effort into the invasion and occupation of Iraq, a stategic blunder that haunts us today and will for the forseeable future as well.
 
Iraq was unnecessary. The SECOND Afghan war was unnecessary. Bush scattered the Taliban for hiding Bin Laden and rightly so. That was necessary. But then Bush let Bin Laden go, left a small force was in Afghanistan and moved the bulk of American forces into Iraq. That was unnecessary.

When Obama became president, he made getting Bin Laden the primary goal, and again, rightly so. To do that, Obama moved the bulk of American forces out of Iraq and back into Afghanistan. If Bush had gotten Bin Laden the FIRST time, we wouldn't be bankrupt, thousands of Americans wouldn't be dead. Bin Laden would have already been gone.

So while it was necessary to go after Bin Laden THE FIRST TIME, if he had been taken care of, we wouldn't have had to go after him a SECOND time. And that's why the second Afghan war was unnecessary. Because Bush FAILED the first time because he wanted to "nation build" and "be a hero". If he had spent 20 minutes studying the region, he might not have been so foolish. Now half the population of Iraq is enslaved and living in Burkas and they've modeled their government on Iran.

One thing about Bush. He was "consistent". In fact, both him AND the Republican Party have been "consistent". Everything they've touched has turned to shit.

So you been smoking with Marc I see.

What is not true?

Bush chased the Taliban out and then allowed them to reestablish because he pulled US troops away to fight in Iraq. Do you deny that?

There are many ways to look at the same thing aren't there.

Yes the Taliban began to strike back after we started in Iraq.

In 2003, after the United States shifted its military efforts to fighting the war in Iraq, attacks on American-led forces intensified as the Taliban and al-Qaeda began to regroup.

Read more: The Taliban — Infoplease.com The Taliban — Infoplease.com
 
LOL!!! Someone thinks this is a court room and we have to answer the way a lawyer would want us to. :cuckoo:

He's just trying to get you to answer a very simple question , rather than you going off on some fucking tangent that totally evades the question and ultimately involves you blaming Bush for everything from the price of eggs to universal disharmony.

The one question thy will refuse to answer, a question that only needs to be answered with yes or no.

Yes.

Bush fucked up and threw 4000 American lives down the toilet by invading Iraq and left a mess for the next administration to clean up, which, slowly,

is what President Obama is doing.

Any more questions?
 
He's just trying to get you to answer a very simple question , rather than you going off on some fucking tangent that totally evades the question and ultimately involves you blaming Bush for everything from the price of eggs to universal disharmony.

The one question thy will refuse to answer, a question that only needs to be answered with yes or no.

Yes.

Bush fucked up and threw 4000 American lives down the toilet by invading Iraq and left a mess for the next administration to clean up, which, slowly,

is what President Obama is doing.

Any more questions?

Typical rightwing rant...

"Why does it take you so long to clean up my mess?"
 
I believe that we did have to go into Iraq. I also believe that the war was fought and won in the first 3 months.

I blame Bush for entrusting Rumsfeld to win the peace. We never should have been occupiers.
 
He's just trying to get you to answer a very simple question , rather than you going off on some fucking tangent that totally evades the question and ultimately involves you blaming Bush for everything from the price of eggs to universal disharmony.

The one question thy will refuse to answer, a question that only needs to be answered with yes or no.

Yes.

Bush fucked up and threw 4000 American lives down the toilet by invading Iraq and left a mess for the next administration to clean up, which, slowly,

is what President Obama is doing.

Any more questions?

You say Bush fucked up, but yet you support Obamush. That's a foolish political partisan bullshit you support. Bush Obamush are two people sewn together back to back.
 
The one question thy will refuse to answer, a question that only needs to be answered with yes or no.

Yes.

Bush fucked up and threw 4000 American lives down the toilet by invading Iraq and left a mess for the next administration to clean up, which, slowly,

is what President Obama is doing.

Any more questions?

Typical rightwing rant...

"Why does it take you so long to clean up my mess?"

Bush wasn't anything close to being right wing so blow it out your ass.
 
When Bush was President, seemed like everyday you heard some ration of crap about how bad a President he was - especially for the Middle East wars. Now, you hardly ever hear anything about the wars at all. Has all the loud mouths gotten to hoarse to yell and scream? Could it be that if you are a Democratic President war is acceptable? Why all of the crickets? All I hear is crickets...

Horseshit. Stop watching Fox and tune to CNN, which covers everything, every day, all day.
 
Yes.

Bush fucked up and threw 4000 American lives down the toilet by invading Iraq and left a mess for the next administration to clean up, which, slowly,

is what President Obama is doing.

Any more questions?

Typical rightwing rant...

"Why does it take you so long to clean up my mess?"

Bush wasn't anything close to being right wing so blow it out your ass.

He sure as he'll was until the rightwing threw him under the bus
 
Crayon Boy said:
More than likely because socialist/progressive liberoidal douchebags have put themselves in charge of these issues, and they're even worse than they were before they stuck in their big fat pinko noses.

barack_obama_birth_certificate_killing_osama_bin_laden.jpg


825.gif
Who knew Osama was hiding in a sand trap at the Congressional Country Club?

BTW, nobody here said anything about a birth certificate, Danny Dickless derailer.

WATCH: Did Christiane Amanpour Know bin Laden Was Hiding in a Pakistan Villa in 2008? - TIME NewsFeed
 
Crayon Boy said:
Who knew Osama was hiding in a sand trap at the Congressional Country Club?

BTW, nobody here said anything about a birth certificate, Danny Dickless derailer.

WATCH: Did Christiane Amanpour Know bin Laden Was Hiding in a Pakistan Villa in 2008? - TIME NewsFeed
See?...Bin Laden wasn't hiding out in a sand trap at the Congressional Country Club.

So much for the claim that Boiking was the one who killed him.
 

Forum List

Back
Top